Library

Notes: Abstract:  The immune system is called into action by alarm signals generated from injured tissues. We examined the nature of these alarm signals after exposure of skin residential cells to contact allergens (nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate) and a contact irritant [sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)].Nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, and SDS were applied topically to the stratum corneum of human skin equivalents. A similar concentration-dependent increase in chemokine (CCL20, CCL27, and CXCL8) secretion was observed for all three chemicals. Exposure to nickel sulfate and SDS was investigated in more detail: similar to chemokine secretion, no difference was observed in the time- and concentration-dependent increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine [interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] secretion. Maximal increase in IL-1α secretion occurred within 2 h after exposure to both nickel sulfate and SDS and prior to increased chemokine secretion. TNF-α secretion was detectable 8 h after chemical exposure. After allergen or irritant exposure, increased CCL20 and CXCL8, but not CCL27, secretion was inhibited by neutralizing human antibodies to either IL-1α or TNF-α.Our data show that alarm signals consist of primary and secondary signals. IL-1α and TNF-α are released as primary alarm signals, which trigger the release of secondary chemokine (CCL20 and CXCL8) alarm signals. However, some chemokines, for example, CCL27 can be secreted in an IL-1α and TNF-α independent manner. Our data suggest that skin residential cells respond to both allergen and irritant exposure by releasing mediators that initiate infiltration of immune responsive cells into the skin.

Notes: In this study, we investigated the capacity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells to suppress nickel-specific effector T cells, both in nickel-allergic patients and healthy controls. CD4+ cells isolated from allergic patients showed an increased proliferative response to nickel, whereas CD4+ cells from negative controls did not respond to allergen. When CD4+CD25+ cells were depleted, nickel-specific responsiveness was strongly increased both in allergic and in non-allergic individuals, with the most pronounced effect in allergic patients. These regulatory T cells were anergic to nickel but inhibited nickel-specific CD4+CD25– effector T cells in coculture experiments. CD4+CD25+ cells from nickel-allergic patients showed only a limited capacity to suppress effector T-cell responsiveness, because an increased nickel reactivity could still be detected in these cocultures. None of the isolated CD4+CD25+ cells, either isolated from healthy controls or allergic patients, produced IL-10 in response to nickel. Overall, these results support the view that CD4+CD25+ cells can control the activation of nickel-specific effector T cells in non-allergic individuals, whereas this regulatory capacity is impaired in allergic patients. To investigate the presence of allergen-specific regulatory T cells in truly naïve, non-sensitized individuals, T-cell reactivity should also be studied with non-environmental contact allergens, such as para-phenylenediamine.

Notes: Local skin memory (LSM) describes the clinical phenomenon of an accelerated and increased inflammatory allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) response upon renewed allergen exposure. This has been ascribed to the local persistence of few, but allergen-specific, T cells. Here, firstly, we characterized effector T cells, and, subsequently, studied which of these cell populations are present at former challenge sites and might contribute to LSM. Peripheral blood T cells were stimulated with nickel sulphate. Cellular phenotypes and chemokine receptor expression profiles were analysed by FACS-staining: CLA together with CD4/CD8, CD45R0/RA, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR6 and CCR10. Skin biopsies were taken at 0, 3 and 21 days after allergen application and analysed for the same markers. Upon nickel-stimulation, amount of CD4+ CLA+ CD45R0+ T cells was increased. Together with CLA, CXCR3, CCR4 and, mainly, CCR10 expression was augmented. CCR6 expression was negative on CLA+ cells. In biopsies from patch tests, cellular infiltrates were present at 3 and 21 days after allergen application. Interestingly at day 21, residing cells were localized at the perivascularity and were characterized as CD4+ CD8− CCR10+ T cells. In conclusion, nickel-activated effector T cells can be characterised as CD4+ CD8− CLA+ memory T cells. They express CXCR3, CCR4 and, in particular, CCR10. After clinical recovery from an ACD reaction, CD4+ CCR10+ memory T cells apparently reside locally. The persistence of these CCR10+ T cells, expressing the appropriate receptor of the skin specific chemokine CCL27, can explain clinically important phenomena such as LSM and flare up reactions.

Notes: Background The basopenia of chronic urticaria relates to histamine releasing autoantibodies in the serum of patients with autoimmune urticaria. This reduction in circulating basophils may be due to active recruitment into weals. If so, it might be expected that numbers in blood would be reduced when urticaria is active and increased after treatment. The primary aim of this study was to look at diurnal variation of basophil numbers in patients with chronic ordinary urticaria (not physical or vasculitic) in relation to disease activity and the effect of treatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids, and to compare the results with healthy controls. A secondary aim was to compare a standard manual counting method with automated basophil counts and to look at numbers of other circulating leucocytes that might be relevant to urticaria pathogenesis.Methods Manual basophil counts using a toluidine blue stain and automated 5-part differentials (Coulter® Gen. S™) were performed at 4-hourly intervals from 08.00 to 20.00 in 10 healthy controls (six women, age 24 to 63 years) and seven chronic urticaria patients (five women, 24 to 50 years). All chronic urticaria patients had severe daily or almost daily urticaria. Only one of six chronic urticaria sera showed in vitro basophil histamine releasing activity. Counts were performed without treatment, after a week of taking loratadine 10 mg daily and after 3 days of adding prednisolone at 0.6 mg/kg/day (maximum 40 mg). Daily urticarial activity scores (UAS) were derived from weal numbers and itch, maximum 7.Results There was no significant overall diurnal variation of basophil numbers in healthy controls or chronic urticaria patients. Mean (SE) manually counted basophil were higher in healthy controls than chronic urticaria (43.4/µL (2.1) vs. 4.4 (0.8), P 〈 0.001). Basophil counts were reduced in healthy controls on steroids (19.2 (1.9), P 〈 0.001) but increased in chronic urticaria (8.9 (1.9), P 〈 0.001). Loratadine did not influence them. UAS fell on treatment (3.3 (0.4) baseline, 1.4 (0.5) on loratadine and 0.5 (0.2) on prednisolone with loratadine, P 〈 0.001). There was a negative linear correlation between basophil numbers and UAS in untreated chronic urticaria patients (P = 0.001, Spearman rank correlation). Manual and automated basophil counts showed poor agreement. Lymphocyte numbers were lower in chronic urticaria than healthy controls. Neutrophils increased whereas lymphocytes and eosinophils decreased in all subjects on prednisolone. They were unaffected by loratadine.Conclusion The results are consistent with the hypothesis that circulating basophils may be recruited from blood into urticarial weals during disease activity. Automated counts are not suitable for assessing basophil numbers in chronic urticaria. The relevance of reduced lymphocyte numbers in chronic urticaria needs to be explored.

Notes: Background Down-regulation or modulation of T cell activity by immunosuppressive drugs is an effective treatment in diseases where exaggerated T cell responses play a role. A primary effect of the anti-inflammatory drugs (AIDs) is inhibition of the synthesis of growth factors, such as IL-2, thereby down-regulating T cell proliferation. However, it is still largely unknown to what extent these AIDs are able to down-regulate specifically type-1 or type-2 T cell cytokine production, and whether they can down-modulate chemokine receptor expression, thereby preventing migration of T cells to the site of inflammation.Objective We investigated the suppressive effect of dermatologically used AID (cyclosporin A (CsA), lactoferrin (LF), 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3), hydrocortisone (HC), di-methyl-fumarate (DMF), diclofenac (DF)) on both type-1 and type-2 T cells. Since allergic contact dermatitis is a skin disorder in which an exaggerated T cell response of both types of T cell subsets can be observed, we used this disorder as a model to study the capacity of AID to suppress type-1 or type-2 T cell responses.Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of nickel allergic patients were cultured in the presence of allergen and increasing concentrations of AID. Proliferation was determined by measuring 3H thymidine incorporation; chemokine receptor (CCR10, CCR4, CXCR3) expression was studied by flow cytometric analysis and IFN-γ or IL-5 cytokine production was measured by ELISA.Results Three major patterns can be distinguished regarding the effect of AID on T cell responses. The first group, including CsA and LF, inhibited non-selectively T cell proliferation, chemokine receptor expression and cytokine production, with CsA as the most potent drug tested. A second group of AID, which included VD3, HC and DMF, suppressed mainly type-1 T cell responses, as revealed by strong interference with IFN-γ production and CXCR3 expression, and limited effects on either or both IL-5 and CCR4 expression. The third pattern was displayed by DF, which down-regulated IL-5 production and CCR4 expression, whereas IFN-γ and CXCR3 were unaltered.Conclusions Using a contact allergy model, we have demonstrated that various AIDs show distinct pharmacological profiles in that either type-1 or type-2 or both T cell responses are suppressed. These results should contribute to a more rational selection of AID in treating inflammatory skin diseases mediated by either or both of these T cell subsets.

Notes: Background  Whereas T lymphocytes are widely accepted as effector cells determining the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis, contradictory results have been found regarding the roles of different T-cell subsets. The use of various experimental models, involving long-term cultured T-cell lines or clones, may explain these contradictory results.Objective  To investigate the involvement of distinct T-cell subsets in patients with nickel contact allergy.Methods  Different T-cell subsets were directly isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of nickel-allergic patients, and their proliferative capacity, type-1 or type-2 cytokine secretion [measured by interferon (IFN)-γ or interleukin (IL)-5 release] and phenotypical marker expression were analysed after stimulation with nickel.Results  Only CD4+ CLA+ CD45RO+ and not CD8+ T cells proliferate and produce both type-1 (IFN-γ) and type-2 (IL-5) cytokines in response to nickel. Moreover, cells expressing the marker CLA in combination with CD4, CD45RO or CD69 are increased after nickel-specific stimulation. Interestingly, in addition, CD45RA+ CLA+ cells showed an increased frequency after allergen-specific stimulation. Analysis of nickel-reactive T cells for expression of distinct chemokine receptors showed that both proliferative capacity and cytokine production are restricted to subsets expressing CXCR3, CCR4 but not CCR6. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of chemokine receptors expressed on nickel-stimulated T cells confirmed these results; a subset of T cells expressing CLA and CXCR3, CCR4 and, most importantly, CCR10 increased in response to allergen, while these CLA+ nickel-reactive T cells were all negative for CCR6.Conclusions  These findings demonstrate that freshly isolated nickel-reactive T cells can be characterized as CD4+ CLA+ memory T cells which express the chemokine receptors CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR10, but not CCR6.

Notes: Two unrelated adult patients are described who both developed an exanthem with the characteristic morphology and distribution of the Gianotti–Crosti syndrome. The literature of adult cases of Gianotti–Crosti syndrome is reviewed with the suggestion that the syndrome may not be as uncommon as previously supposed.