Library

Notes: Abstract: Vertebral fractures may be minor or lead to pain, decreased physical function, immobility, social isolation and depression, which together contribute to quality of life. A Working Party of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis has developed a specfic questionnaire for patients with vertebral fractures. This questionnaire, QUALEFFO, includes questions in the domains pain, physical function, social function, general health perception and mental function. QUALEFFO was validated in a multicenter study in seven countries. The study was done in 159 patients aged 55–80 years with clinical osteoporosis, i.e., back pain and other complaints with at least one vertebral fracture and lumbar bone mineral density T-score 〈−1. Patients with a recent vertebral fracture were excluded because of unstable disease. Controls were age- and sex-matched, and did not have chronic back pain or vertebral fractures. Subjects with conditions exerting a major influence on quality of life were excluded. The QUALEFFO was administered twice within 4 weeks and compared with a generic questionnaire, the Short Form 36 of the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36). Standard spinal radiographs were made for assessment of vertebral height. Seven questions were removed from the analysis because of low response rate, linguistic ambiguities or redundancy. The 41 remaining questions were analyzed for repeatability, internal consistency and the capacity to discriminate between patients with vertebral fractures and controls. Comparison with the SF-36 was performed within similar domains by conditional logistic regression and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The repeatability of QUALEFFO was good (kappa statistics 0.54–0.90) and 26 of 41 questions had a kappa score ≥0.70. The internal consistency of the five domains was adequate, with Crohnbach α around 0.80. All except five questions discriminated significantly between patients and controls. The median scores of QUALEFFO were significantly higher in patients with vertebral fractures than in controls in all five domain (p〈0.001), which is consistent with decreased quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Spinal radiographs were assessed using the McCloskey–Kanis algorithm. According to this, 124 patients (78%) had vertebral fractures of ≥3 SD severity, in contrast with 7 controls (4%). Significant correlations existed between scores of similar domains of QUALEFFO and the SF-36, especially for pain, physical function and mental function. All five domains within each questionnaire discriminated significantly between fracture cases and controls. The odds ratios for pain and social function were greater for QUALEFFO, while general health perception was more discriminating using the SF-36. The ROC curve analysis of QUALEFFO indicated that all five domains were significantly predictive of vertebral fractures. When comparing similar domains of the two questionnaires, QUALEFFO domains demonstrated significantly better performance for pain, physical function and social function. The QUALEFFO total score and SF-36 physical composite score showed similar performance. In conclusion, QUALEFFO is repeatable, coherent and discriminates well between patients with vertebral fractures and control subjects. The results of this study confirm the decreased quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures.

Notes: Abstract: While several studies have described the rate and pattern of involutional bone loss in women, far less information is available for men. Furthermore, the roles of lifestyle and body build in determining bone loss rate in both sexes have been largely extrapolated from cross-sectional studies. We addressed this issue in a population-based longitudinal study which sought to ascertain rates of bone loss at the femoral neck and lumbar spine in a cohort of men and women aged 60–75 years at baseline, and to relate this loss to anthropometric and lifestyle variables. We additionally investigated the capacity of biochemical markers of bone turnover to predict bone loss rates in these subjects. Women lost bone at all sites; this ranged from 0.20%/year at the lumbar spine to 1.43%/year at the femoral trochanteric region. By contrast, men lost only 0.20%/year at the trochanteric region, and gained at the lumbar spine (0.33%/year) and at Ward’s triangle (0.27%/year) over the 4-year period. Anthropometric measurements were associated with bone loss in both sexes; lower baseline body mass index (BMI) and a greater rate of loss of adiposity over the follow-up period were both associated with greater bone loss at all proximal femoral sites. These attained statistical significance after Bonferroni correction at the total proximal femur among both men (r= 0.29), p〈0.01) and women (r= 0.31, p〈0.05). Lifestyle factors associated with lower rates of bone loss (after adjustment for BMI) included alcohol consumption at the femoral neck among women (p= 0.007) and physical activity at the lumbar spine among men (p = 0.05). Serum parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and biochemical markers of bone turnover did not predict bone loss after adjustment for adiposity.