Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Der Unfallchirurg 102 (1999), S. 298-304 
    ISSN: 1433-044X
    Keywords: Key words Pancreas-injury • Damage-control • Treatment-outcome • Retrospective-studies • Injuries-morbidity ; Schlüsselwörter Pankreasverletzungen • Schadensbegrenzung • Behandlungsergebnisse • Retrospektive Studie • Morbidität
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Die Behandlung von 18 Patienten mit Pankreastrauma in den letzten 15 Jahren wurde retrospektiv analysiert; 13 waren Opfer von stumpfen Verletzungen; 17 waren polytraumatisiert mit einem ISS 〉 15. Sie hatten durchschnittlich 2,4 intraabdominal und 2,7 extraabdominal assoziierte Verletzungen. Der mediane Pankreasverletzungsgrad war gemäß dem OIS II. Es wurden eine partielle Duodenopankreatektomie und 5 distale Resektionen durchgeführt. Bei den anderen Patienten erfolgte eine äußere Drainage. Es wurden bei der Primäroperation im Mittel 3 zusätzliche Organe mitversorgt, 2 davon intraabdominal. Der Ersteingriff erfolgte bei 13 Verletzten in den ersten 6 h nach dem Unfall; 7 Patienten (39 %) verstarben während der Hospitalisation. Keiner verstarb intraoperativ, einer in den ersten 48 h. Bei 12 Patienten traten abdominale Komplikationen auf, wobei 5 daran verstarben. 4 von 5 Patienten mit begleitenden Verletzungen der großen Gefäße verstarben. Die mittlere Hospitalisationsdauer war 49 Tage. Die mittlere Drainagedauer und Nahrungskarenzdauer betrug 26 respektive 21 Tage. Die Priorität bei der Erstoperation gilt der Versorgung von Blutungsquellen, der Behebung weiterer Kontamination, der Feststellung des Verletzungsausmaßes am Pankreas und der großzügigen Drainage. Beim Schwerverletzten soll in einer geplanten möglichst frühzeitigen Zweitoperation die Pankreasverletzung durch einen in der Pankreaschirurgie erfahrenen Operateur definitiv versorgt werden.
    Notes: Summary This is a retrospective analysis of the treatment of 18 patients with pancreatic injuries at our institution. 13 were victims of blunt abdominal trauma. 17 sustained a polytrauma and had an ISS 〉 15. They had 2.4 associated intraabdominal and 2.7 associated extraabdominal injuries. The mean pancreatic organ injury scale was II. A partial duodenopancreatectomy was performed in one case. In 5 cases a distal pancreatic resection was necessary. In the remaining patients drainage procedures were applied. 3 additional injured organs had to be treated during the first operation. 2 of them were situated intraabdominally. The primary operative procedure was performed in 13 cases during the first 6 hours after the trauma. 7 patients (39 %) died during the hospitalisation. None deceased during an operation. 5 patients (28 %) died because of abdominal complications. 4 of 5 patients with injuries to the great vessels died. 12 had abdominal complications. The mean hospitalisation time was 49 days. The mean drainage time was 26 days. The patients sustained parenteral nutrition for 21 days. The priority in the primary operative approach is damage control. This consists of bleeding control, control of enteral spillage, assessment of pancreatic damage, especially recognition of any ductal injury and generous drainage of the injured pancreas. Definitive treatment in the severly injured patient has to be performed after hemodynamic stabilisation without delay by an experienced surgeon.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2218
    Keywords: Key words: Common bile duct stones — Gallbladder — Bile duct calculi — Laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are a frequent problem (10–15%) in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Over the last decade, new diagnostic and surgical techniques have expanded the options for their management. This report of the Consensus Development Conference is intended to summarize the current state of the art, including principal guidelines and an extensive review of the literature. Methods: An international panel of 12 experts met under the auspices of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives for gallstone disease. Prior to the conference, all the experts were asked to submit their arguments in the form of published results. All papers received were weighted according to their scientific quality and relevance. The preconsensus document compiled out of this correspondence was altered following a discussion of the external evidence made available by the panel members and presented at the public conference session. The personal experiences of the participants and other aspects of individualized therapy were also considered. Results: Our panel of experts agreed that the presence of common bile duct stones should be investigated in all patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Based on preoperative noninvasive diagnostics, either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiography should be employed for detecting CBDS. Eight of the 12 panelists recommended treating any diagnosed CBDS. For patients with no other extenuating circumstances, several treatment options exist. Stones can be extracted during ERCP, or either before or (in exceptional cases) after laparoscopic or open surgery. Bile duct clearance should always be combined with cholecystectomy. Evidence for further special aspects of CBDS treatment is equivocal and drawn from nonrandomized trials only. Conclusions: The management of common bile duct stones is currently undergoing some major changes. Many diagnostic and therapeutic strategies need further study.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Surgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques 13 (1999), S. 1065-1069 
    ISSN: 1432-2218
    Keywords: Key words: Laparoscopy — Cancer — Palliation — Pancreatic cancer — Laparoscopic staging — Gastroenterostomy — Hepaticojejunostomy — Pancreas
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Most patients presenting with pancreatic cancer are irresectable at the time the diagnosis is made. Therefore, they are in need of palliative treatment that can guarantee minimal morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. To address this need, we designed a study to test the feasibility of laparoscopic gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy and to compare their results with those achieved with open techniques. Methods: We performed a case control study of a new concept in laparoscopic palliation based on the findings of preoperative imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic side-to-side gastroenterostomy and end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy (Roux-en-Y) were done in irresectable cases. Of 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic palliation, three had a laparoscopic double bypass, seven had a gastroenterostomy, and four underwent staging laparoscopy only. The results were compared with a population of 14 matched patients who had conventional palliative procedures. Results: Postoperative morbidity was 7% vs 43% for laparoscopic and open palliation, respectively (p 〈 0.05). There were no mortalities in the laparoscopic group, as compared to 29% in the group who had open bypass surgery (p 〈 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group (p 〈 0.06). Operating time tended to be shorter in the laparoscopic group (p 〈 0.25). Morphine derivatives were necessary for a significantly shorter period after laparoscopic surgery (p 〈 0.03). Conclusions: Our preliminary experience strongly suggests that laparoscopic palliation can reduce the three major drawbacks of open bypass surgery—i.e., high morbidity, high mortality, and long hospital stay.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...