Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: cisplatin ; dFdCTP accumulation ; gemcitabine ; pharmacodynamics ; pharmacokinetics ; phase I study ; Pt-DNA adducts
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Purpose: To determine possible schedule dependent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, CDDP) in patients with advanced stage solid tumors in a phase I trial. Patients and methods: A total of 33 patients with advanced stage solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine (30-min infusion, 800 mg/m2) and cisplatin (one-hour infusion, 50 mg/m2). Sixteen patients had a four-hour interval between gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (days 1 and 8), followed by the reverse schedule and seventeen patients had a 24-hour interval between gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (days 2 and 9), followed by the reverse schedule. Gemcitabine and cisplatin pharmacokinetics were measured in plasma and white blood cells (WBC), isolated from blood samples taken at several time points after the start of treatment. Results: A four-hour time interval between both agents did not reveal major differences in plasma pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, dFdU (deaminated gemcitabine) and platinum (Pt), and of gemcitabine–triphosphate (dFdCTP) accumulation and Pt-DNA adduct formation in WBC between the two different sequences of gemcitabine and cisplatin. In the patients treated with the 24-hour interval, cisplatin before gemcitabine did not significantly change peak gemcitabine levels and the AUC of plasma dFdU, but tended to increase dFdCTP AUC in WBC 1.5-fold (P 〈 0.06). Gemcitabine before cisplatin decreased the plasma AUC of Pt 2.1-fold (P = 0.03). No significant differences in Pt-DNA adduct levels in WBC were found, although gemcitabine before cisplatin tended to increase the 24-hour retention of Pt-DNA adducts. Creatinine clearance on day 28 was related to the peak plasma levels of total Pt (linear regression coefficient (r) = 0.47, P = 0.02, n = 26). Furthermore, the increase in the Pt-GG to Pt-AG ratio 24 hours after cisplatin treatment was related to the overall response of patients (r = 0.89, P 〈 0.01, n = 8). Conclusions: Of all schedules the treatment of patients with cisplatin 24 hours before gemcitabine led to the highest dFdCTP accumulation in WBC and total Pt levels in plasma. These characteristics formed the basis for further investigation of this schedule in a phase II clinical study.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: cisplatin ; esophageal cancer ; gemcitabine ; schedule dependency
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the tolerability of four alternating cisplatin–gemcitabine schedules. A secondary aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this combination. Patients and methods: Forty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received alternating sequences with a 4- and 24-hour interval of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was administered as a 30-min infusion on day 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and 8; in case of the 24-hour time interval the second drug was administered one day later. Four cisplatin–gemcitabine schedules were studied: gemcitabine four hour before cisplatin (10 patients), or vice versa (14 patients) and gemcitabine twenty-four hours before cisplatin (9 patients) or vice versa (8 patients). The sequence of drug administration was reversed in the second cycle of therapy in each individual patient, enabling the evaluation of sequence-dependent side effects. Twenty-six patients had received prior chemotherapy, of which twenty-one platinum-based. Results: The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Overall, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 27 out of 41 patients (66%) and was not schedule dependent. No serious bleeding occurred. Leukopenia was significantly different between the 4 alternating schedules (P = 0.01); gemcitabine 24 hours before cisplatin was significantly less toxic compared to both cisplatin 4 hours and 24 hours before gemcitabine (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, paired analysis of the 4-hour and 24-hour data sets showed that leukopenia was significantly more serious when cisplatin preceded gemcitabine (P = 0.005). Although most patients received prior treatment, both prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not related to toxicity. Overall, grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 19 out of 41 patients (46%). Anemia (Hb ≤6.0 mmol/l) was not sequence dependent and was observed in 63% of patients. Myelotoxicity was cumulative between cycles and caused frequent omission of gemcitabine on day 15. Overall, in 51% of administered cycles there was no omission of gemcitabine. A mean of 3.5 therapy cycles was administered. Non-hematological toxicity was moderate, consisting mainly of grade 1 and 2 nausea/vomiting and fatigue, and was not schedule dependent. Recently, we described that the schedule in which cisplatin was administered 24 hours before gemcitabine produced the best pharmacological profile. Based on this and because toxicity was manageable, the schedule cisplatin 24 hours prior to gemcitabine was chosen for phase II evaluation. Nine out of thirty-six evaluable patients had an objective response. These responses were observed in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, ovarian and esophageal carcinoma. Conclusions: Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity. Leukopenia was schedule dependent: gemcitabine before cisplatin was less toxic than the reversed sequence, in this respect. Some encouraging responses were seen in patients with esophageal cancer. Currently, a phase II study with cisplatin 24 hours before gemcitabine is ongoing in patients with advanced upper gastro-intestinal tumors.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Gemcitabine ; Colon cancer ; Continuous infusion ; schedule dependence
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  2′,2′-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) is a cytidine analogue with established antitumor activity against several experimental tumor types and against human ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer. Both preclinical studies and most clinical trials involving patients with solid tumors have focused on short-term administration schedules; however, mechanistic studies indicate that a continuous-infusion schedule may be more effective. We determined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in mice using various schedules. At these MTDs we observed considerably better antitumor activity of gemcitabine in two of three murine colon carcinoma lines using a prolonged administration as compared with a standard bolus protocol (i.p. 120 mg/kg q3d×4). On the latter schedule, Colon 26–10 grown in BALB/c mice was the most sensitive tumor line, showing a growth-delay factor (GDF, number of doubling times gained by the treatment) of 6.7, whereas Colon 38 (grown in C57/B16 mice) was the least sensitive tumor, displaying a GDF of 0.9. Prolonged treatment (q3d×6) of Colon 26–10 at a lower dose (100 mg/kg) enhanced the antitumor activity (GDF 9.6) while producing similar toxicity. A similar weight loss was found following the continuous infusion (c.i.) of gemcitabine using Alzet osmotic pumps s.c. for 3 or 7 days (2 mg/kg), but the GDF increased to 2.4 in Colon 38 (C57/B16) as compared with that provided by the bolus injections. Continuous infusion of gemcitabine at 15 mg/kg per 24 h q7d×2 i.v. via the tail vein was more effective than bolus injection against Colon 26–10, with the GDF being 〉17.7 and 73% of the tumors regressing completely. However, against Colon 38 tumors this schedule was not effective (GDF 0.4), even with a 25% higher dose. The plasma pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine was determined after one bolus dose (120 mg/kg). The peak concentration of gemcitabine was 225 μM and that of the deaminated catabolite 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) was 79 μM. The elimination of gemcitabine was much faster than that of dFdU, with the t 1/2ß values being 15 min and 8 h, respectively. For the c.i. schedules, plasma concentrations were below the detection limit of the assay (〈0.5 μM). Our results suggest that prolonged infusion of gemcitabine can give a better antitumor activity than bolus injections and shows promise of being active in clinical trials.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Tumor size ; Tumor origin ; Cisplatin ; 5-Fluorouracil ; Leucovorin modulation ; Antitumor activity
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  5-Fluorouracil (FUra) is one of the few effective agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Its effects on the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) can be modulated by leucovorin (LV) or cisplatin (CDDP). Tumor size and differentiation of tumor characteristics can influence therapeutic efficacy. We therefore studied the relationship between tumor size (cutoff point 200 mm3) and the antitumor activity of FUra and its modulation by LV in murine Colon 26 and Colon 38 tumors. The doubling time of tumors measuring 〉200 mm3 was about 160% longer. The antitumor effect of FUra in these large tumors was decreased and could not be modulated by LV. In addition, three subtypes of Colon 26 (Colon 26-A, Colon 26-B, and Colon 26-10) were identified and characterized for tumor-induced weight loss, TS activity, response to chemotherapy, and histological features. Mice bearing Colon 38 and Colon 26-10 did not lose weight as a result of tumor growth. Colon 26-A caused a weight loss of up to 19%, whereas mice with Colon 26-B tumors remained within 10% of their initial weight and tolerated at least 2.5 times more tumor load than did mice bearing Colon 26-A, which induces cachexia. Among untreated tumors, TS catalytic activity was highest in Colon 26-B (5536 pmol mg protein-1 h-1) and lowest in Colon 38 (799 pmol mg protein-1 h-1); Colon 26-A and Colon 26-10 had intermediate activities (about 2500 pmol mg protein-1 h-1). 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) binding was comparable in the three Colon 26 subtypes but was lower in Colon 38. The antitumor activity of FUra could be modulated by LV in Colon 38, Colon 26-10, and Colon 26-A but could not in Colon 26-B, with complete responses (CR) being obtained in Colon 26-10 and Colon 38. The latter two were highly sensitive to CDDP, followed by Colon 26-A and Colon 26-B (CRs: 50%, 40%, 25%, and 0, respectively). Furthermore, necrosis was noted in Colon 26-B and Colon 38 but not in Colon 26-A. In conclusion, (1) the antitumor activity of FUra in large tumors is decreased and cannot be modulated by LV and (2) characteristics and sensitivity to chemotherapeutics can vary substantially in closely related tumors of the same origin.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1432-1335
    Keywords: Key words 5-Fluorouracil ; Leucovorin ; Thymidylate synthase ; Colon cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract We evaluated the effects of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) on thymidylate synthase (TS) in normal rapidly dividing tissues, which may contribute to toxic side-effects of treatment with 5FU and LV. TS levels were determined in biopsies of human liver and colon mucosa and murine bone marrow, liver and intestinal mucosa at several time points after administration of therapeutic doses of 5FU or LV/5FU. In murine liver, after treatment with 100 mg/kg 5FU, TS inhibition was significantly higher than after LV/5FU administration (P〈0.001). A similar trend was observed in human liver tissue. Murine intestinal mucosa had TS levels below the limit of detection after 5FU or LV/5FU treatment. In human colon mucosa samples, administration of 500 mg/m2 5FU resulted in a large extent of TS inhibition but the small number of samples did not allow a time- or 5FU-LV/5FU-related evaluation. TS activity in murine bone marrow cells was strongly inhibited to 10% of the control value during 48 h. LV/5FU administration resulted in a slightly higher inhibition. No human bone marrow was available to measure TS levels. Both in mice and humans the most pronounced TS inhibition occurred in the tissue that was involved in dose-limiting toxicity. Therefore it is very likely that TS inhibition in normal tissues contributes to the toxic side-effects of 5FU treatment.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISSN: 1573-739X
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...