Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Physiologia plantarum 81 (1991), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1399-3054
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Photoinhibition of photosynthesis and its recovery were studied in intact barley (Hordeum vuigare L. cv. Gunilla) leaves grown in a controlled environment by exposing them to two temperatures, 5 and 20°C, and a range of photon flux densities in excess of that during growth. Additionally, photoinhibtion was examined in the presence of chloramphenicol (CAP, an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis) and of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU). Susceptibility to photoinhibition was much higher at 5 than at 20°C. Furthermore, at 20°C. CAP exacerbated photoinhibition strongly, whereas CAP had little additional effect (10%) at 5°C. These results support the model that net photoinhibition is the difference between the inactivation and repair of photosystem II (PSII); i.e. the degradation and synthesis of the reaction centre protein, Dl. Furthermore, the steady-state extent of photoinhibition was strongly dependent on temperature and the results indicated this was manifested through the effects of temperature on the repair process of PSII. We propose that the continuous repair of PS II at 20°C conferred at least some protection from photoinhibition. At 5°C the repair process was largely inhibited, with increased photoinhibition as a consequence. However, we suggest where repair is inhibited by low temperature, some protection is alternatively conferred by the photoinhibited reaction centres. Providing they are not degraded, such centres could still dissipate excitation energy non-radiatively, thereby conferring protection of remaining photochemically active centres under steady-state conditions.A fraction of PS II centres were capable of resisting photoinhibition when the repair process was inhibited by CAP. This is discussed in relation to PS II heterogeneity. Furthermore, the repair process was not apparently activated within 3 h when barley leaves were transferred to photoinhibitory light conditions at 20°C.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2048
    Keywords: Actinidia ; Chlorophyll fluorescence ; Growth season ; Photoinhibition of photosynthesis ; Photosynthesis (photoinhibition) ; Temperature and photoinhibition
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Abstract Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson) plants grown in an outdoor enclosure were exposed to the natural conditions of temperature and photon flux density (PFD) over the growing season (October to May). Temperatures ranged from 14 to 21° C while the mean monthly maximum PFD varied from 1000 to 1700 μmol · m−2 · s−1, although the peak PFDs exceeded 2100 μmol · m−2 · s−1. At intervals, the daily variation in chlorophyll fluorescence at 692 nm and 77K and the photon yield of O2 evolution in attached leaves was monitored. Similarly, the susceptibility of intact leaves to a standard photoinhibitory treatment of 20° C and a PFD of 2000 μmol · m−2 · s−1 and the ability to recover at 25° C and 20 μmol · m−2 · s−2 was followed through the season. On a few occasions, plants were transferred either to or from a shade enclosure to assess the suceptibility to natural photoinhibition and the capacity for recovery. There were minor though significant changes in early-morning fluorescence emission and photon yield throughout the growing season. The initial fluorescence, Fo, and the maximum fluorescence, Fm, were, however, significantly and persistently different from that in shade-grown kiwifruit leaves, indicative of chronic photoinhibition occurring in the sun leaves. In spring and autumn, kiwifruit leaves were photoinhibited through the day whereas in summer, when the PFDs were highest, no photoinhibition occurred. However, there was apparently no non-radiative energy dissipation occurring then also, indicating that the kiwifruit leaves appeared to fully utilize the available excitation energy. Nevertheless, the propensity for kiwifruit leaves to be susceptible to photoinhibition remained high throughout the season. The cause of a discrepancy between the severe photoinhibition under controlled conditions and the lack of photoinhibition under comparable, natural conditions remains uncertain. Recovery from photoinhibition, by contrast, varied over the season and was maximal in summer and declined markedly in autumn. Transfer of shade-grown plants to full sun had a catastrophic effect on the fluorescence characteristics of the leaf and photon yield. Within 3 d the variable fluorescence, Fv, and the photon yield were reduced by 80 and 40%, respectively, and this effect persisted for at least 20 d. The restoration of fluorescence characteristics on transfer of sun leaves to shade, however, was very slow and not complete within 15 d.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...