Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-0646
    Keywords: CC-1065 analogs ; chemotherapy ; cytotoxicity ; biochemical effects ; DNA interaction
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary CC-1065 was found to cause delayed toxicity at therapeutic doses, therefore, a large number of analogs have since been synthesized. A series of analogs with simplified but closely related structures were chosen for this investigation because some were found to be superior to CC-1065 in the treatment of several experimental tumors. The inhibition of L1210 cell growth by U-68,415 was comparable to that by CC-1065. A similar situation was true in terms of their in vivo potency; however, U-68,415 was superior to CC-1065 in terms of anti-P 388 leukemia activity. At the optimal dosage, U-68,415 produced 4 out of 6 long-term (〉 30 day) survivors; whereas CC-1065 produced a mere 62% increase of life span (ILS) and no long-term survivors. The order of antitumor potency and effectiveness of the CC-1065 analogs was U-68,415 〉 U-66,694 〉 U-68,819 〉 U-66,664, which was parallel to the inhibition of L1210 cell growth. CC-1065 and all the analogs tested here inhibited DNA synthesis approximately 10 times more than RNA synthesis. Protein synthesis was the least inhibited. On a molar basis, U-68,415 was about 6–9 times more inhibitory toward cellular DNA synthesis than CC-1065, yet the interaction and/or binding of CC-1065 to DNA determined by circular dichroism, DNA melting or differential cytotoxicity assay was much stronger than that of U-68,415. The order of binding of these analogs to calf thymus DNA was U-68,415 〉 U-66,694 〉 U-68,819 〉 U-66,664, and was parallel to that of DNA synthesis inhibition which was in turn parallel to cell growth inhibition and antitumor potential. These results collectively suggest that the cellular DNA is a major site of the action of CC-1065 analogs; however, time course studies reveal that the inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis could not wholly account for their cytotoxicity. Hence, the precise mechanism of action of these agents is not yet fully understood. U-68,415, which exhibited superior activity against a number of tumors and did not cause delayed death in mice, warrants further investigation. U-68,415 is a racemate and two chiral isomers were recently isolated. Therefore, further investigation of both U-68,415 and its chiral isomers is necessary.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-0646
    Keywords: human tumor cell lines ; L1210 ; drug sensitivity
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract L1210 leukemia cells, because of their rapid growth rate in suspension culture and high growth fraction, are ideally suited to screen in vitro for cytotoxic compounds. Although L1210 cells may mimic rapidly growing tumors, they have not been effective in selecting agents active against slow growing solid tumors. We expected that cell lines originating from human solid tumors, because of their slower growth rate and lower S phase fraction, would be more drug resistant than L1210. Therefore, we compared ten human tumor cell lines (5 melanomas, 4 colon carcinomas and 1 small cell lung carcinoma) to L1210 growth inhibition by 9 anti-tumor drugs. Not one human tumor cell line was consistently more resistant to all nine drugs than L1210 when the cells were exposed to drugs for about 2 doubling times. The drug sensitivity of 2 cell lines (L1210 and SK MEL 28) was again determined after a short term (2 hr) exposure and using growth inhibition and cell survival as end points. For both end points these two cell lines exhibited a random pattern of sensitivity to the drugs tested. Cell kill showed an order of sensitivity different than growth inhibition. The implication of these findings for drug-screening is discussed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...