Library

Notes: 3,3-Dimethylbutanol-2 (3,3-DMB-ol-2) and 2,3-dimethylbutanol-2 (2,3-DMB-ol-2) have been decomposed in comparative-rate single-pulse shock-tube experiments. The mechanisms of the decompositions are The rate expressions are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k_{\rm B} (2,3{\rm - DBM - ol - 2}) = 10^{16.24} {\rm exp}(- 37,400/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k_{\rm EP} (2,3{\rm - DBM - ol - 2}) = 10^{14.17} {\rm exp}(- 32,300/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k_{\rm ET} (2,3{\rm - DBM - ol - 2}) = 10^{13.66} {\rm exp}(- 32,700/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k_{\rm B} (3,3{\rm - DBM - ol - 2}) = 10^{16.33} {\rm exp}(- 37,500/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k_{\rm EP} (3,3{\rm - DBM - ol - 2}) = 10^{14.0} {\rm exp}(- 34,200/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} They lead to D(iC3H7—H) - D((CH3)2(OH) C—H) = 8.3 kJ and D(C2H5—H) - D(CH3(OH) CH—H) = 24.2 kJ.These data, in conjunction with reasonable assumptions, give \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k(t{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} {\rm OH} \to {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \cdot + \cdot {\rm C(CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm)}_{\rm 2} {\rm OH}) = 10^{16.8} {\rm exp}(- 40,900/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k(i{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} {\rm OH} \to {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \cdot + \cdot {\rm CH(CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm)OH}) = 10^{16.5} {\rm exp}(- 41,100/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k(n{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} {\rm OH} \to {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \cdot + \cdot {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm OH}) = 10^{16.2} {\rm exp}(- 41,100/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$k({\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 5} {\rm OH} \to {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \cdot + \cdot {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm OH}) = 10^{16.4} {\rm exp}(- 42,500/T)\sec ^{- 1}$$\end{document}andThe rate expressions for the decomposition of 2,3-DMB-1 and 3,3-DMB-1 are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(2,3{\rm - DMB - 1} \to {\rm CH}_3 \cdot + {\rm H}_2 {\rm C} = {\rm C}({\rm CH}_3 ) - \mathop {\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}({\rm CH}_3 )) = 10^{16.0} \exp ( - 35,700/T)\sec ^{ - 1} } $$\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(3,3{\rm - DMB - 1} \to {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \cdot + {\rm H}_2 {\rm C = CH} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} ({\rm CH}_3 )_2 ) = 10^{16.2} \exp ( - 35,500/T)\sec ^{ - 1} $$\end{document}

Notes: Cyclopentane has been decomposed in comparative-rate single-pulse shock-tube experiments. The pyrolytic mechanism involves isomerization to 1-pentene and also a minor pathway leading to cyclopropane and ethylene. This is followed by the decomposition of 1-pentene and cyclopropane. The rate expressions over the temperature range of 1000°-1200° K are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(c-{\rm C}_{\rm 5} {\rm H}_{{\rm 10}} \to 1-{\rm C}_{\rm 5} {\rm H}_{{\rm 10}}) = 10^{16.1} \exp (- 42,700/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(c-{\rm C}_{\rm 5} {\rm H}_{\rm 10} \to (c-{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6} + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 4}) = 10^{16.25} \exp (- 47,840/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(1 - {\rm pentene} \to {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6} + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 5}) \sim 10^{16} \exp (- 35,900/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(1 - {\rm pentene} \to {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6} + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 4}) \sim 10^{12.5} \exp (- 28,900/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(c-{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6} \to {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6}) = 10^{14.3} \exp (- 31,100/T)\sec ^{- 1} {\rm at}\ {\rm 5}\ {\rm atm} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(c-{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6} \to {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6}) = 10^{14.1} \exp (- 31,100/T)\sec ^{- 1} {\rm at}\ {\rm 1.7}\ {\rm atm} $$\end{document}Details of the cyclopentane decomposition processes are considered, and it appears that if the trimethylene radical is an intermediate, then ΔHf(trimethylene) ≤ 280 kJ/mol at 300°K.

Notes: The mechanism and initial rates of decomposition of cyclohexane and 1-hexene have been determined from single-pulse shock-tube experiments. The main initial processes involve isomerization of cyclohexane to 1-hexene, followed by decomposition of 1-hexene. From comparative rate experiments the following rate expressions have been derived: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm cyclohexane} \to 1 - {\rm hexene}) = 10^{16.7} \exp (- 44,400/T)\,\,\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k_B (1 - {\rm hexene} \to {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{{\rm 5}} \cdot {\rm + nC}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{{\rm 7}} \cdot) = 10^{15.9} \exp (- 35,600/T)\,\,\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k_{\rm M} (1 - {\rm hexene} \to 2{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_6) = 10^{12.6} \exp (- 28,900/T)\,\,\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} The 1-hexene bond-braking reaction leads to an allylic resonance energy of 42.7 kJ and a heat of formation of allyl radicals of 176.6 kJ (300°K). There appear to be general relations relating the rate expressions for the decomposition of alkynes, alkanes, and alkenes. Studies on the induced decomposition of cyclohexane have also been carried out.

Notes: The life times of chemically activated alcohols have been determined using the high-pressure unimolecular rate parameters for thermal decomposition of alcohols from shocktube studies and RRKM calculations. They are compared with literature numbers (from insertion of 0(1D) into hydrocarbons). It is suggested that in some cases singlet oxygen carries excess energy into the hydrocarbon. The consequences of such an assumption are explored and discrepancies with previously published conclusions discussed.

Notes: Tertiary-amyl amine has been decomposed in single-pulse shock-tube experiments. Rate expressions for several of the important primary steps are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11 - {\rm NH}_2} \to t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11}\!\!\cdot + {\rm NH}_2\cdot) = 10^{15.9} \exp (-39,700/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5- {\rm C}({\rm CH}_3)_2{\rm NH}_2 \to {\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 \cdot + \cdot{\rm C}({\rm CH}_3)_2{\rm NH}_2) = 10^{16.5} \exp (- 38,500/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k(t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11} {\rm NH}_2 \to {\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{10} + {\rm NH}_3) 〈10^{14.5} \exp (- 37,200/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document}This leads to D(CH3—H) - D(NH2—H) = -10.5 kJ and D[(CH3)3C—H] - D[(CH3)2NH2C—H] = + 6 kJ.The present and earlier comparative rate single-pulse shock-tube data when combined with high-pressure hydrazine decomposition results-(after correcting for fall off effects through RRKM calculations) gives \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ [k_r^2 (t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11} \cdot,{\rm NH}_2 \cdot)/k_r (t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11} \cdot,t{\rm C}_5 {\rm H}_{11} \cdot)k_r ({\rm NH}_2 \cdot,{\rm NH}_2 \cdot)]^{1/2} \sim 2\,{\rm at}\,1100^o {\rm K} $$\end{document} where kr(…) is the recombination rate involving the appropriate radicals. This suggests that in this context amino radical behavior is analogous to that of alkyl radicals. If this agreement is exact, then \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k_\infty ({\rm N}_2 {\rm H}_4 \to 2{\rm NH}_2 \cdot) = 10^{16.25} \exp (- 32,300/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} Rate expressions for the primary step in the decomposition of a variety of primary amines have been computed. In the case of benzyl amine where data exist the agreement is satisfactory. The following differences in bond energies have been estimated: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ D(i{\rm C}_3 {\rm H}_7 {-\!-} {\rm H}) {-\!-} D[{\rm CH}_3 ({\rm NH}_2){\rm CH} {-\!-} {\rm H}] = 14.3\,{\rm kJ} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ D({\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5 {-\!-} {\rm H}) - D({\rm NH}_2 {\rm CH}_2 {-\!-} {\rm H}) = 15.9\,{\rm kJ} $$\end{document}

Notes: 4-Methylhexyne-1, 5-methylhexyne-1, hexyne-1, and 6-methylheptyne-2 have been decomposed in comparative-rate single-pulse shock-tube experiments. Rate expressions for the initial decomposition reactions at 1100°K and from 2 to 6 atm pressure are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}s {\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \to {\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{\rm 2} \cdot + s{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \cdot) = 10^{15.9} \exp (- 35,000/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}i {\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \to {\rm allene} + n{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 8}) = 10^{12.9} \exp (- 28,000/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}i {\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \to {\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{\rm 2} \cdot + i{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \cdot) = 10^{16.1} \exp (- 36,700/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}i {\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \to {\rm allene} + i{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 8}) = 10^{2.3} \exp (- 27,500/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}n {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} \to {\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{\rm 2} \cdot + n{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} \cdot) = 10^{15.9} \exp (- 36,300/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm HC} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{{\rm 2}^{{\rm -}}}n {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} \to {\rm allene} + n{\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 6}) = 10^{12.7} \exp (- 28,400/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm CH}_3 {\rm C} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{2^{-}}i {\rm C}_4 {\rm H}_9 \to {\rm CH}_3 {\rm C}) \equiv {\rm CCH}_{\rm 2} \cdot + i{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9} \cdot) = 10^{16.2} \exp (- 36,800/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k({\rm CH}_3 {\rm C} \equiv {\rm CCH}_{2^{-}}i {\rm C}_4 {\rm H}_9 \to 1,2-butadiene + i{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 8}) = 10^{12.3} \exp (- 28,700/T)\sec ^{- 1} $$\end{document} In combination with previous results, rate expressions for propargyl C—C bond cleavage are related to that for the alkanes by the expression \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ k_{\rm B} (alkyne) = \frac{1}{{3 \pm 1.5}}\exp (+ 4.25/T)k_{\rm B} (alkane) $$\end{document} These results yield a propargyl resonance energy of D(nC3H7-H) - D(C3H3-H) = 36 ± 2 kJ, in excellent agreement with a previous shock-tube study. They also lead to D(CH3C≡CCH2-H) - D(C3H3-H) = 0.6 ± 3 kJ, D(sC4H9-H) - D(iC3H7-H) = 0 ± 3 kJ, D(iC4H9-H) - D(nC3H7-H) = 2 ± 3 kJ, and D(nC3H7-H) - D(iC3H7-H) = 13.9 ± 3 kJ (all values are for 300°K). The systematics of the molecular decomposition process are explored.

Notes: The experimental data on alkane decomposition from shock-tube and radical buffer studies and radical combination from very-low-pressure pyrolysis and modulation spectroscopy are shown to be consistent. They lead to experimental A factors which decrease by factors of 10-2000 from 300° to 1100°K. Heats of formation for ethyl, isopropyl, and t-butyl radicals have been found to be 10, 10 and 20 kJ higher than currently accepted numbers from metathesis reactions.

Notes: Hexamethylethane has been decomposed in a flow system in the temperature range of 700-900 K. The mechanism involves carbon-carbon bond cleavage at the most highly substituted position and rapid formation of isobutene from the t-butyl radical. The rate expression is \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ \begin{array}{*{20}c}{k({\rm (tC}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9})_2 \to 2t{\rm C}_{\rm 4} {\rm H}_{\rm 9}.) = 10^{17.4} {\rm exp(} - 36,000/{\rm T)}} & {{\rm sec}^{ - 1}}\\\end{array} $$\end{document} and is completely consistent with deductions from radical buffer, shock-tube, and direct recombination studies. Of special importance is experimental evidence for large decreases of the A factor with increasing temperature and a high heat of formation for the t-butyl radical, ΔHf(tC4H9·)300 = 52.7 ± 6 kJ.