Electronic Resource
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
The @Cambridge law journal
10 (1950), S. 392-410
ISSN:
0008-1973
Source:
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives
Topics:
Law
Notes:
The purpose of this article is to consider whether, and if so to what extent, a limitation following one which is void for remoteness is itself void. The subject is one of the most obscure in the rule against perpetuities, and it has always seemed to me that the well-known monographs are at their least satisfactory on this topic-Although I have no desire to revive old controversies, it will not be possible to avoid occasional references to such controversial matters as the rule in Whitby v. Mitchell, the application of the modern rule against perpetuities to legal contingent remainders, and the scope of the cy-près doctrine.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300004372
Permalink
Library |
Location |
Call Number |
Volume/Issue/Year |
Availability |