Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 28 (1991), S. 1-9 
    ISSN: 1573-0867
    Keywords: 32P ; plant P uptake ; soil P taken up by plants ; soil-plant relationships ; soil test
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Abstract A laboratory method and a laboratory index is proposed to estimate the phosphorus taken up by plants that is derived from fertilizers (Pdff). Pdff values were measured using greenhouse experiments and32P labelling technics. The laboratory index estimates the proportion of PO4-ions derived from the fertilizer in the soil solution and is measured by means of an isotopic exchange of32PO4-ion procedure. This indicator was named JCF. Two typical soil-fertilizer conditions were studied. One concerned measurement of Pdff and JCF values for freshly-applied phosphorus as diammonium phosphate (DAP) at levels of 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 mg P kg−1 soil. The other concerned measures of Pdff and JCF values for two types of P residues previously applied in soils as concentrated superphosphate (CSP) or Gafsa rock phosphate (GRP) applied at 0 and 43.7 kg.ha−1 each year over a 15 yr period. For freshly-applied DAP a linear relationship between Pdff and JCF values was obtained over the range of 0 to 90 mg P (kg soil)−1 levels of application: JCF = 1.16 Pdff + 1.78, (r 2 = 0.98). For the P residues, JCF and Pdff values were not significantly different for a given residual treatment. However JCF and Pdff pair data for CSP treatments (56.0, 65.9) were about tenfold superior to those for GRP treatments (5.3, 4.6)). Consequently the nearly 1:1 ratio between JCF and Pdff values that was obtained for the two different soil-fertilizer conditions suggests that the proposed laboratory method can be used to predict availability of P fertilizers to plants. Thus it deserves to be considered in helping to estimate P fertilizer applications.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 24 (1990), S. 115-122 
    ISSN: 1573-0867
    Keywords: 32P ; plant P uptake ; relative agronomic effectiveness ; DAP ; rock phosphate ; phospal
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Abstract The agronomic effectiveness of P fertilizers, as sources of phosphorus for crops, was evaluated using the quantities, Pf, of phosphorus taken up byLolium perenne grown on 14 soils during greenhouse experiments in pot cultures. The Pf quantities were determined using32P-labelled fertilizers. Data were analysed using a new concept: the Isotopic Relative Agronomic Effectiveness (IRAE). The IRAE value was defined as the ratio of the Pf quantity, taken up by a crop, of a tested fertilizer over the Pf quantity, taken up by a crop, of a fertilizer used as standard. In our experiments diammonium phosphate (DAP) was used as standard P fertilizer and two rock phosphates, the North Carolina rock phosphate (NCPR) and a calcium-iron-aluminium phosphate (Phospal), were tested. As a linear relationship between Pf(NCPR) quantities and Pf(DAP) quantities was obtained, with r2 = 0.95, when the application rates increased from 15 mgP (kg soil)−1 to 200 mgP (kg soil)−1, it is conciuded that IRAE values for a given fertilizer, other than the standard fertilizer, could be determined with a single rate of application. As regards soil pH in the range 4.7 to 8.2 the IRAENCPR is related to soil pH by a curvilinear relationship: log IRAENCPR = −(0.44) pH + 4.05 with r2 = 0.89. The average of IRAEphospal values was 0.15 with a standard error = 7% irrespective of soil pH. Then a logarithmic relationship was obtained between IRAE values of the two tested fertilizers and their water P-solubility determined at the soil pH where they were applied.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...