ISSN:
1573-2614
Keywords:
Portapres device
;
thermodilution method
;
cardiac output
;
critical care unit
;
hemodynamics
;
Bland and Altman Statistics
;
sepsis
;
respiratory problems
;
catecholamines
;
finger arterial perfusion
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Computer Science
,
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract Objective.This study was carried out to compare cardiac output measurements determined by thermodilution and by Portapres, a non-invasive system. Design, patients and setting.Eighty-seven non-invasive blood pressure measurements were performed in 46 patients in our critical care unit utilising the new, non-invasive Portapres system. Cardiac output values were obtained from these blood pressure values using an aortic impendance model and compared to cardiac output values estimated by the thermodilution technique.Measurements and main results.Statistically significant (p〈 0.01) differences (2.3 l/min; limits of agreement ± 5l/min) were noted between invasive and non-invasive cardiac output measurements. Differences in measured cardiac outputs increased for patients receiving catecholamine therapy, in patients with hemodynamic instability(e.g., sepsis and cardiac insufficiency), in patients with artificial ventilation, in patients with long duration of intensive care, in younger(〈60 yr) patients and in women. We found no influence of the body mass index (BMI) on the accuracy of Portapres results. In only one single subgroup,10 patients with pulmonary diseases, Portapres measurements were not statistically significant different from reference results. Conclusions.To date, Portapres measurements cannot replace thermodilution cardiac output estimations. Fluctuations of finger arterial perfusion due to hemodynamic instability, hypothermia and catecholamines may be responsible for problems of Portapres use in critically ill patients.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011481115195
Permalink
