Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Histamine ; H1 antagonists ; Chlordiazepoxide ; Punished responding ; Squirrel monkeys
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Squirrel monkeys were trained to press a key under a two-component schedule of food presentation. In the presence of either green or red stimulus lights, the 30th response produced a food pellet (fixed-ratio schedule). During the red stimulus lights (punishment component), the first response of each fixed ratio produced either an IV injection of histamine (100.0 μg/kg/inj) or a brief electric shock (3.0 mA). Responding was selectively suppressed in either punishment component. Presession IM administration of chlorpheniramine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), diphenhydramine (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg), or pyrilamine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) increased rates of responding punished by histamine but not those punished by electric shock. Presession administration of promethazine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) or tripelennamine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) also increased rates of responding punished by histamine in all subjects and response rates punished by electric shock in one of three subjects. Chlordiazepoxide (3.0–56.0 mg/kg) increased rates of responding punished by either histamine or electric shock. These results suggest that the punishing effects of histamine injection are mediated by H1 receptors and that H1-receptor antagonists increase rates of responding suppressed by punishment only under limited conditions including those in which histamine is the punishing stimulus.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...