Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 39 (1996), S. 252-255 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colorectal cancer follow-up ; Colonoscopy ; Metachronous neoplasms
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine costeffective colonoscopy guidelines for patients with prior colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of patients who had been treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma and later underwent follow-up colonoscopy from 1984 to 1994. RESULTS: During this study period, 389 patients previously treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent follow-up colonoscopy. All patients had perioperative colon evaluation for other neoplasms. Ages ranged from 26 to 89 (mean, 65.8) years, and 46.8 percent were female. Recurrent or metachronous cancer or a neoplastic polyp constituted a positive examination. Results of 389 first follow-up colonoscopies were compared with 259 second (66.6 percent), 165 third (42.4 percent), and 83 fourth (21.3 percent) follow-up examinations. Median interval between all colonoscopies was 13 months. Positive examination rates for the first two yearly examinations were 18.3 and 18.5 percent, respectively. Slightly lower, third-year and fourth-year positive examination rates were 16.4 and 14.5 percent, respectively. Fouryear examinations yielded the following: first year-1 carcinoid, 1 new adenocarcinoma, and 100 polyps; second year-1 anastomotic recurrence and 68 polyps; third year-55 polyps; and fourth year-1 recurrent cancer and 17 polyps. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that 1) annual follow-up colonoscopy for two years after colorectal cancer surgery is beneficial for detecting recurrent and metachronous neoplasms and 2) the interval between subsequent examinations may be increased depending on the result of the most recent examination.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 39 (1996), S. 806-810 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colonoscopy ; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage ; Polypectomy
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence, diagnostic methods, and treatment of hemorrhage occurring after colonoscopic polypectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 12,058 patients who underwent colonoscopy at an academic referral center between January 1989 and July 1993. Of these, 6,365 patients required polypectomies or biopsies. RESULTS: After these procedures, 13 patients (0.2 percent) developed lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring hospitalization. All bleeding episodes occurred within 12 days of polypectomy or biopsy (mean=8 days). Twelve patients (92 percent) underwent technetium-tagged red blood cell scintigraphy, which localized bleeding in four patients (31 percent). In the eight patients with normal scintigrams, hemorrhage did not recur, and no further evaluation was performed. Five patients (38 percent) underwent arteriography. Arteriogram was positive in two of four patients with positive scintigrams, and bleeding was controlled with selective vasopressin infusion. The fifth patient had arteriography without prior diagnostic studies because of massive hemorrhage; the bleeding site was identified and controlled with selective vasopressin infusion. Three patients had lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, with endoscopic identification of bleeding site in two patients, and endoscopic electrocautery controlled the bleeding in one patient. In the 13 patients with hemorrhage, cessation of bleeding occurred with intestinal rest and hydration in nine patients (69 percent), selective vasopressin infusion in three patients (23 percent), and endoscopic electrocautery in one patient (8 percent). Eight patients (62 percent) required blood transfusion with a mean of 4.8 units (excluding one patient on warfarin sodium who required 14 units of blood). No patient required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of hemorrhage after colonoscopic polypectomy or biopsy is low, and in our series, hemorrhage resolved without the need for surgical intervention. Management includes initial stabilization followed by diagnostic evaluation. Technetium-tagged red blood cell nuclear scintigraphy identifies ongoing bleeding and identifies patients in whom additional invasive procedures (arteriography, lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopy) are warranted.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 35 (1992), S. 178-181 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colonoscopy ; Screening ; Hyperplastic polyps
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract A prospective study investigated the significance of solitary diminutive colonic polyps discovered during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eighty-two patients with a solitary diminutive polyp (≤5 mm) underwent colonoscopy after cold biopsy of the index polyp. Of the patients with adenomatous index polyps, 42.5 percent had proximal neoplastic polyps. Of the patients with hyperplastic index polyps, proximal neoplastic polyps were found in 38.9 percent. These data suggest that diminutive polyps identified during flexible sigmoidoscopy, whether adenomatous or hyperplastic, place the patient in the intermediate risk group for colorectal neoplasia. We recommend that any patient with polyps seen during screening sigmoidoscopy, regardless of histopathology, should undergo colonoscopy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 43 (2000), S. 976-979 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colonoscopy ; Polyps ; Flexible sigmoidoscopy
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract PURPOSE: Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with adenomatous polyps. Significant cost savings would result from identification of subgroups of patients in whom less costly surveillance would suffice. This study was performed to determine the natural history of patients undergoing removal of isolated rectosigmoid adenomas and to establish whether flexible sigmoidoscopy might be adequate for follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of a database of 7,677 colonoscopies, from 1990 to 1996, identified patients who had a minimal follow-up of two years after removal of adenomatous polyps isolated to the rectosigmoid. Polyps detected on surveillance colonoscopy were categorized as distal (≤60 cm from anal verge), proximal (〉60 cm from anal verge), and diffuse (proximal plus distal). The risk of polyp formation was determined by actuarial analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients undergoing surveillance for adenomas met inclusion criteria. At the index colonoscopy, 124 isolated rectosigmoid polyps were identified. The median polyp size was 1 cm and median frequency was one polyp. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort (N = 62) was 53 months. At follow-up surveillance colonoscopy, 105 additional adenomas were discovered and removed in 40 patients. No malignant polyps were detected. The pattern of polyps detected were proximal (n=19), rectosigmoid (n=16), and diffuse (n=5). CONCLUSIONS: The majority (65 percent) of patients with isolated rectosigmoid polyps have additional polyps on long-term surveillance, and 60 percent of patients will have these polyps located proximal to the reach of a sigmoidoscope. Therefore, flexible sigmoidoscopy is not a safe alternative for surveillance of patients with isolated rectosigmoid polyps.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...