Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 39 (1996), S. 1227-1231 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colonic surgery ; Colostomy ; Morbidity
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Purpose: The trend toward avoidance of a colostomy at both elective and emergency large-bowel surgery is partly driven by the perceived morbidity and low closure rates of temporary stomas. The aim of this study was to examine whether significant colostomy-related morbidity remains persistently high. METHODS: To examine this, we reviewed 120 patients with a potentially reversible colostomy performed during either elective or emergency large-bowel surgery during a seven-year period. RESULTS Forty-seven patients underwent elective and 73 patients underwent emergency colonic or colorectal resection. Fifty-eight patients had colorectal carcinoma (48.3 percent), diverticular disease accounted for 39 patients (32.5 percent), and a miscellaneous group of 23 patients (19.2 percent) made-up the remainder. Seven patients died, all in the emergency group (9.6 percent). Colostomy-related morbidity, which included stenosis, retraction, prolapse, and hernia formation, occurred in 19.2 percent of patients, with no difference between the elective (14.9 percent) and emergency (21.9 percent) groups or underlying pathologic condition. Colostomy closure was performed initially in 71 patients (59.2 percent). Highest closure rates occurred in the diverticular group (84.6 percent), followed by the colorectal carcinoma group (48.3 percent), and then the miscellaneous group (43.5 percent). One patient died undergoing colostomy closure, and complications occurred in 25 patients (35.2 percent), requiring fashioning of a second colostomy in eight patients, two of whom were closed. Final colostomy closure rate was 54.2 percent. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the contention that both formation and closure of defunctioning colostomies are associated with significant complications; furthermore, approximately one-half of patients will not have their colostomy closed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2218
    Keywords: Laparoscopic bile duct injury ; Routine intraoperative cholangiography ; Biliary tract
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Controversy over whether intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) should be done routinely has intensified since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). As yet, no study has demonstrated a clear benefit to its use, although their have been suggestions in the literature that routine use may confer an advantage to detection of injuries. One-hundred seventy-seven biliary tract complications occurring secondary to LC were identified from the combined data of seven institutions. The goal of this retrospective study was to examine the impact of IOC on the occurrence, recognition, and correction of such complications. The complications identified include 39 cystic duct leaks, 69 major ductal leaks or strictures, and 69 major ductal transection or excision injuries. Whether IOC was performed was known in 157 (88%) patients with 53 patients definitely having and 104 not having an IOC. Data concerning IOC were unavailable in 20 cases. More injuries were detected intraoperatively in the group having IOC (P〈0.001). Conversion of the LC to a laparotomy, often for repair of the injury, occurred more commonly in the group having a correctly interpreted IOC (P〈0.001). Conversion resulted in detection of injuries sooner, resulting in fewer operative procedures to correct the injury (P〈0.001). A transecting injury was prevented in at least seven patients when no visualization of the proximal biliary tree was documented by IOC. These partial ductal incisions were treated by t-tube placement. Incorrect interpretation of the IOC occurred in at least eight patients, with no identification of the proximal biliary tree in six. These data suggest routine IOC may offer significant potential advantages in the detection and subsequent correction of these injuries, as well as preventing extension of partial ductal incisions to complete ductal transections. Surgeons must be able to correctly interpret the IOC. Although routine IOC is suggested, careful dissection principles continue to be most important in the prevention of major extrahepatic bile duct injuries during LC.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...