Bibliothek

feed icon rss

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Schlagwort(e): Bone mineral density ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Hormone replacement therapy
    Quelle: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Thema: Medizin
    Notizen: Abstract It is well established that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) will prevent postmenopausal loss of bone. However, it is not known to what extent HRT will continue to affect bone mineral density (BMD) in women established on HRT compared with those commencing treatment. We recruited 48 healthy early postmenopausal women into a prospective, comparative study. Twenty-nine women had never taken HRT (group A) whilst 19 women were already taking HRT (group B) (conjugated equine oestrogens, 0.625 mg daily; mean (±SD) years of use 2.2 (1.5) years). All of the women were started on, or switched to, micronized 17β-oestradiol (2 mg/day) continuously with dydroges-terone (10 mg/day) for the first 14 days of each cycle. BMD measurements were performed at the lumbar spine and proximal femur using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of treatment. Group A showed a significantly greater increase in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months (mean (±SD)=5.3 (4.6)%) compared with group B (mean(±SD)=2.1 (2.1)%) and 24 months of treatment (group A, mean(±SD)=6.4 (5.2)%; group B, mean (±SD)=2.3 (2.6)%; bothp〈0.01). Femoral neck and Ward's triangle BMD increased significantly in both groups but there were no significant differences between the groups. Baseline BMD correlated with change in lumbar spine BMD for women in group A after 12 months (r=−0.67,p〈0.01) and 24 months of treatment (r=−0.59,p〈0.05). These data demonstrate that HRT has the greatest effect on BMD when it is first administered, especially in those women with low BMD, but improvements may still be observed in women continuing HRT in the longer term.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Digitale Medien
    Digitale Medien
    Springer
    Osteoporosis international 6 (1996), S. 480-485 
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Schlagwort(e): Bisphosphonate ; Bone density ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Osteoporosis ; Pamidronate
    Quelle: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Thema: Medizin
    Notizen: Abstract We have performed a 2-year prospective double-masked study to determine whether the bisphosphonate pamidronate can prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women and its optimal dosage regimen. One hundred and twenty-one such women (mean ± SD age 57.6±3.4 years; mean ± SD time since menopause 7.5±3.5 years) were randomized to receive either oral pamidronate (300 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 4 months (group A), oral pamidronate (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 2 months (group B) or identical placebo capsules (group C). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at baseline and at 6-month intervals for 2 years using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD at the lumbar spine (L2–4) increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (mean ± SD 2.8±2.1% and 3.0±2.9% respectively, bothp〈0.001) but decreased in the placebo group (−1.6±3.1%,p〈0.01). Identical results were seen for BMD at the femoral neck, which increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (1.2±2.3% and 1.3±2.9% respectively, bothp〈0.05) but decreased in the placebo group (−1.9±3.9%,p〈0.05). There were significant differences over 2 years between the groups at all anatomical sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck and trochanteric region, allp〈0.001; Ward's triangle,p〈0.01). However, there were no significant differences between groups A and B, suggesting that the two treatment regimens were equally effective in conserving BMD. There were, however, marked differences in tolerability between the two treatment regimens: 13 women (34%) in group A withdrew from the study because of side-effects, but only 5 women (12%) in group B, which was comparable with placebo. These data demonstrate that intermittent oral pamidronate will prevent bone loss from the lumbar spine and proximal femur of postmenopausal women, and that the more frequent but lower dose regimen is well tolerated.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...