Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 39 (1996), S. 739-743 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Colorectal cancer ; Family history ; Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer ; Hereditary susceptibility
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Close relatives of patients with colorectal cancer are at an increased risk of developing a colorectal malignancy themselves. PURPOSE: A study was conducted to compare risks in relatives of patients diagnosed at different ages. METHODS: Family histories were taken from two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer: Group A, a population group of 65 patients diagnosed at or under 45 (median, 42) years; Group B, 212 patients of all ages (median, 68 years) treated in a single surgeon's practice. RESULTS: Overall relative risk of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives was 5.2 in Group A and 2.3 in Group B. There was familial clustering of colorectal cancers suggestive of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in 13 (20 percent) families to Group A but to only 3 (1.5 percent) families in the second group. Cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer for relatives of the young cohort rose steeply from 40 years, reaching 5 percent at age 50 years and 10 percent at age 70 years. This contrasts with risk for relatives of older patients, in whom the shape of the curve resembles that of the overall population risk, reaching 5 percent at age 70 years and 10 percent at age 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a quantitative and qualitative increase in risk to relatives of patients diagnosed at a young age compared with those diagnosed later to life, at least part of which is likely to be the result of a hereditary susceptibility. Close relatives of early onset cases warrant more intensive endoscopic screening and at an earlier age than relatives of patients diagnosed at older ages.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Diseases of the colon & rectum 41 (1998), S. 765-769 
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Multiple primary cancers ; Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer ; Replication errors
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract PURPOSE: Multiple primary cancers are a feature of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in which defects in DNA repair mechanisms result in accumulation of replication errors within tumor DNA. We assessed replication error incidence in multiple primary cancer patients who may have similar genetic defects. METHODS: DNA was obtained from 69 patients from the Yorkshire region who had developed colorectal cancer and one other primary tumor from the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer tumor spectrum (28 colorectal, 12 stomach, 15 ovary, and 14 uterus). DNA was also obtained from 86 sporadic, single primary cancer patients attending a colorectal cancer clinic. Replication error status was assessed at five microsatellite loci using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and computer-assisted analysis. RESULTS: The replication error phenotype was observed in 7 of 86 (8 percent) of the sporadic single primary patients. This compared with 23 of 69 (33 percent) of the multiple primary group (P〈0.001). Replication error was also observed more frequently in each subgroup. Even excluding patients from families meeting the Amsterdam criteria (likely to be hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and have the replication error phenotype), this increased frequency remained in both the multiple primary group (P〈0.005) and multiple colorectal and colorectal/uterine subgroups (P〈0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that genetic instability plays an important role in development of multiple primary cancers, particularly from certain cancer subsets. Testing for replication errors may be an appropriate way of identifying individuals at risk of multiple primary cancers.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...