Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Key words Mechanical ventilation ; Critical care ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Patient-ventilator interaction ; Proportional assist ; Pressure support ; Work of breathing physiology
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: To investigate the breathing pattern and the inspiratory work of breathing (WOBI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assisted with proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV). Design: Prospective controlled study. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: Thirteen COPD patients being weaned from mechanical ventilation. Interventions: All patients were breathing PSV and two different levels of PAV. Measurements and main results: During PAV (EVITA 2 prototype, Dräger, Germany), the resistance of the endotracheal tube (Ret) was completely compensated while the patients' resistive and elastic loads were compensated for by approximately 80 % and 50 % (PAV80 and PAV50), respectively. PSV was adjusted to match the same mean inspiratory pressure (Pinspmean) as during PAV80. Airway pressure, esophageal pressure and gas flow were measured over a period of 5 min during each mode. Neuromuscular drive (P0.1) was determined by inspiratory occlusions. Mean tidal volume (VT) was not significantly different between the modes. However, the coefficient of variation of VT was 10 ± 4.%, 20 ± 13 % and 15 ± 8 % during PSV, PAV80 and PAV50, respectively. Respiratory rate (RR) and minute ventilation (VE) were significantly lower during PAV80 as compared with both other modes, but the differences did not exceed 10 %. PAV80 and PSV had comparable effects on WOBI and P0.1, whereas WOBI and P0.1 increased during PAV50 compared with both other modes. Conclusion: Mean values of breathing pattern did not differ by a large amount between the investigated modes. However, the higher variability of VT during PAV indicates an increased ability of the patients to control VT in response to alterations in respiratory demand. A reduction in assist during PAV50 resulted in an increase in WOB and indices of patient effort.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1435-1420
    Keywords: Key words Mechanical ventilation ; intensive care therapy ; assisted spontaneous breathing ; work of breathing ; Schlüsselwörter Respirator-therapie ; Intensivtherapie ; assistierte Beatmung ; Atemarbeit
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung An 16 druckunterstützt beatmeten Patienten, davon acht mit chronisch obstruktiver Lungenerkrankung (COPD) und acht ohne obstruktive Lungenkrankheiten wurde der Einfluß eines PEEP von 5 cmH2O und einer Druckunterstützung von 5 und 10 cmH2O auf die mechanische Atemarbeit und andere atemmechanische Meßgrößen untersucht. Sowohl durch PEEP wie auch durch Druckunterstützung konnte die Atemarbeit gesenkt werden. Die Kombination beider Maßnahmen wirkte additiv. Ein PEEP von 5 cm H2O und eine Druckunterstützung von 10 cmH2O senkte die Atemarbeit im Durchschnitt um mehr als 50% in beiden Patientengruppen. Ohne Druckunterstützung leistet der Patienten mehr als 20% seiner gesamten Atemarbeit auf Widerstände des Beatmungssystems (z.B. Gasflußanlieferung, Triggermechanismus etc.). Durch 10 cmH2O Druckunterstützung war dieser Atemarbeitsanteil nahezu kompensiert und zu vernachlässigen. Ein bestehender intrinsischer PEEP bei COPD-Patienten erhöhte die Atemarbeit und wurde durch Applikation eines externen PEEP vermindert. Die Höhe der Atemarbeit war in unserer Untersuchung interindividuell sehr unterschiedlich. Daher erscheint uns eine individuelle Anpassung von PEEP und Druckunterstützung anhand der gemessenen Atemarbeit sinnvoll.
    Notes: Summary The influence of pressure support of 5 and 10 cmH2O and low-level positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5cm H2O on work of breathing (WOB) and breathing pattern was studied in 16 mechanically ventilated patients. Eight patients suffered from chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), eight patients had no obstructive lung disease. Low-level PEEP as well as pressure support reduced the work of breathing. Combination of both measures was additively effective. PEEP of 5 cmH2O and pressure support of 10 cmH2O decreased WOB more than 50% on average. Without any pressure support more than 20% of WOB were done on the ventilator system (e.g. flow delivery, trigger mechanism etc.). By application of 10 cmH2O of pressure support this part of the work of breathing was negligible. In COPD patients an intrinsic PEEP increased the work of breathing which was counterbalanced by an external PEEP. However, our study revealed high interindividual differences in WOB. Thus, measurement of work of breathing is encouraged to optimize the ventilatory setting by individual adaptation of the PEEP and pressure support level.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...