Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • C-peptide  (1)
  • Keywords Type I (Insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus  (1)
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0428
    Keywords: Keywords Type I (Insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus ; intervention ; prevention ; autoantibodies ; insulin-prophylaxis.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The Schwabing Insulin Prophylaxis Trial is a randomised, controlled pilot study designed to examine whether insulin therapy can delay or prevent the clinical onset of Type I diabetes in high risk first degree relatives of people with the disease. First degree relatives of patients with Type I diabetes, who were aged 4 years or more, had an islet cell antibody (ICA) value more than 20 Junevile Diabetes Foundation Units (JDF-U), a reduced first phase insulin response (FPI) to an i. v. glucose tolerance test less than the 5th centile, and a normal oral glucose tolerance test were eligible for the trial. Between January 1989 and October 1995, 1736 relatives of patients with Type I diabetes were screened for ICA. We identified 64 cases (3.7 %) with ICA values more than 20 JDF-U. Of ICA positive relatives, 17 (27 %) had a low FPI and were eligible for enrolment. Of these 14 agreed to participate, of whom 7 were randomised to the treatment group and 7 to the control group. In the treatment group, human insulin was administered i. v. by continuous infusion for 7 days, followed by daily s. c. injections for 6 months. Intravenous insulin infusions were repeated every 12 months. In the treatment group 3 of the 7 individuals (follow-up from time of eligibility: 2.3 to 7.1 years) and in the control group 6 of the 7 untreated individuals (1.7 to 7.1 years) developed clinical diabetes. Life table analysis showed that clinical onset of Type I diabetes was delayed in insulin-treated subjects compared with control subjects (means ± SEM diabetes-free survival: 5.0 ± 0.9 years vs 2.3 ± 0.7 years, p 〈 0.03). Insulin levels after i. v. glucose increased in the first year of intervention therapy. Titres of ICA, and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase, and tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA2 remained unchanged. These data suggest that insulin prophylaxis can delay the onset of overt diabetes in high risk relatives. This is encouraging in view of 1) the continuing American Diabetes Prevention Trial, which is currently testing the effect of parenteral insulin in a large nation-wide study and 2) the initiation of pilot trials to determine whether new antigen-specific intervention is more effective in delaying the clinical onset of Type I diabetes. [Diabetologia (1998) 41: 536–541]
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Type 2 diabetes ; Secondary failure of sulfonylureas ; Combined therapy insulin/glibenclamide ; Hyperinsulinemia ; C-peptide
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary In type 2 diabetes with “secondary failure of sulfonylurea therapy” good metabolic control can seldom be achieved by insulin therapy even with high insulin doses. Hyperinsulinemia however is a possible risk factor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Maintaining the effects of sulfonylurea action insulin should be added in as small amounts as possible to avoid hyperinsulinemia and to ameliorate hyperglycemia. 16 type 2 diabetics with “secondary failure” were treated either with insulin alone (group A;n=8) or with 3.5 mg b.i.d glibenclamide plus small amounts of intermediate insulin (group B;n=8) in a randomised order. After the inpatient period outpatient control was performed monthly up to six months, later on four times a year up to two years. Both groups were comparable with regard to age, duration of diabetes, body weight and metabolic control. The daily insulin dose was 14±2 IU $$(\bar x \pm SEM)$$ after one month and 19±2 IU after two years in group B. In contrast 30±3 IU and 43±5 IU respectively were needed in group A (p〈0.001). All patients B were treated with one daily injection, all patients A needed two injections. Resulting in nearly identical metabolic control in group A basal insulin levels exceeded those in group B after two years significantly (28.6±3.7 vs. 18.6±1.6 mcU/ml;p〈0.01). Endogenous C-peptide response was suppressed in group A compared to group B after inpatient period and after one month (0.12±0.01 vs. 0.49±0.15 and 0.09±0.04 vs. 0.13±0.08 pmol/ml;p〈0.05). The combined therapy of insulin and sulfonylureas demonstrates the benefit of a prolonged sulfonylurea administration in the treatment of type 2 diabetes with “secondary failure”. As compared to common insulin therapy a small amount of exogenous insulin by one daily injection additionally to glibenclamide shows similar improvement in metabolic control. Hyperinsulinemia as a risk factor of macroangiopathy is markedly reduced in patients treated with combined therapy compared to those with insulin alone.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...