Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 40 (1980), S. 131-145 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Interstitiospinal neurons ; Vestibular system ; Semicircular canal inputs ; Axon branching
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary 1. Interstitiospinal neurons were activated by antidromic stimulation of the ventromedial funiculus of the spinal cord at C1 and C4 in cerebellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. 46% of these neurons responded only at C1 (N cells) and the remaining 54% responded at C4 also (D cells). There is no topographical difference in the location of N and D cells. Conduction velocities of N cells were significantly slower than those of D cells. 2. Stimulation of the contralateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of 31% of both N and D cells; some responded early enough to suggest disynaptic connections, many responded late. Stimulation of the ipsilateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of several cells, one spontaneously discharging D cell was inhibited. 3. Stimulation of the contralateral individual semicircular canal nerves evoked firing of 33% of N cells and 13% of D cells. Most of these responses were late. N cells responded not only to the vertical canals but also to the horizontal canal, whereas D cells responded to the horizontal canal, but seldom to the vertical ones. Most canal responding neurons received specific input, only two N cells received convergent input from both the anterior and horizontal canals. Stimulation of the ipsilateral canals did not evoke excitation of any cells tested; one D cell was inhibited by stimulation of the horizontal canal nerve. 4. Stimulation of the rostral medial vestibular nucleus evoked characteristic negative field potentials centered in the contralateral interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC). Approximately 60% of both N and D cells received excitation from the contralateral vestibular nuclei. About 17% of these responding neurons received monosynaptic excitation, most frequently from the rostral medial nucleus. Stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei evoked firing of 12% of both N and D cells. 5. Twenty-nine neurons were fired antidromically by weak stimuli applied to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Twenty-seven of the 29 were activated only from C1 and were found in the INC (10 cells) and in the reticular formation dorsal to the INC (19 cells). Measurement of the spread of the effect of stimulus current and comparison of latencies to stimulation of the vestibular nuclei and C1 indicated that these neurons have axon collaterals going to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Only one of them received excitation from the contralateral posterior canal, others did not respond to the labyrinth. Some were activated by stimulation of the vestibular nuclei.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Interstitial nucleus of Cajal ; Burst-tonic neuron ; Vertical eye movement ; Vertical semicircular canal ; Electrical stimulation ; Latency ; Cat
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Recent studies have shown that the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) in the midbrain reticular formation is involved in the conversion of vertical semicircular canal signals into eye position during vertical vestibuloocular reflexes. Secondary vestibulo-ocular relay neurons related to the vertical canals, which constitute the majority of output neurons sending signals from the vestibular nuclei directly to the oculomotor nuclei, have been shown to project axon collaterals to the region within and near the INC. To understand how the INC is involved in the signal conversion, latencies of response of neurons in the INC region to electrical stimulaton of the vestibular nerve were examined in alert cats. The responses of 96 cells whose activity was clearly modulated by sinusoidal pitch rotation (at 0.31 Hz) were analyzed. These included 41 cells whose activity was closely correlated with vertical eye movement (38 burst-tonic and 3 tonic neurons), and 55 other cells (called pitch cells as previously). Twenty nine of the 96 cells (30%) were activated at disynaptic latencies following single shock stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve. Disynaptically activated cells were significantly more frequent for pitch cells than for eye movement-related cells (25/55 = 45% vs 4/41 = 10%; p 〈 0.001, Chi-square test). Conversely, cells that did not receive short-latency activation (〈 6 ms) were more frequent among eye movement-related cells than pitch cells (26/41 = 63% vs 13/55 = 24%; p 〈 0.001, Chi-square test). Pitch cells showed significantly less phase lag (re head acceleration) than eye movement-related cells during sinusoidal pitch rotation (mean ± SD 124° ± 17° vs 138° ± 14°. p 〈 0.01, t-test). These results suggest that 1) cells in the INC region other than burst-tonic and tonic neurons mainly receive direct inputs from secondary vestibulo-ocular relay neurons, and that 2) vertical canal signals reach eye movement-related neurons mainly polysynaptically.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Midbrain reticular formation ; Interstitio-vestibular neurons ; Vestibular system ; Semicircular canal inputs ; Axon branching
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Experiments were performed on cats anesthetized with a chloralose to locate neurons in and around the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) that project to the vestibular nuclei, and to study labyrinthine inputs to these neurons. Neurons that project to the vestibular nuclei were identified by microstimulation confined to the vestibular nuclei on both sides. All neurons thus identified were activated antidromically from the ipsilateral (but not contralateral) vestibular nuclei. Vestibular projecting neurons were found in the INC and the reticular formation rostral, dorsal and caudal to the INC. About 23% of these neurons were vestibular branching spinal projecting neurons. The median conduction velocity of vestibular projecting neurons was estimated to be in the neighborhood of 12–16 m/s. Stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve evoked firing in 29% of neurons projecting to the vestibular nuclei, but not to the spinal cord. Interstitial neurons responded more frequently than reticular neurons (45% vs 11%, χ2 test, p 〈 0.001). By stimulation of individual semicircular canal nerves, it was shown that vestibular projecting neurons receive excitation from the contralateral vertical canals, but do not receive substantial inputs from the horizontal canal. Stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve excited 10% of neurons; suppression of activity was observed for six cells and four of the six were excited by stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve. Stimulation of ipsilateral individual semicircular canal nerves did not excite any cells tested; the activity of a few cells was suppressed by stimulation of the vertical canal nerves. One neuron received excitation from the contralateral anterior canal and suppression from the ipsilateral posterior canal. Vestibular branching spinal projecting neurons rarely received labyrinthine inputs as already reported (Fukushima et al. 1980a). These results suggest that vestibular projecting neurons may be involved in vertical vestibular reflexes.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 121 (1998), S. 92-98 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Key words Saccade ; Latency ; Fixation ; Smooth pursuit ; Gap ; Human
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  To examine the effects of smooth-pursuit eye movements on the initiation of saccades, their latency was measured when subjects initially fixated or pursued a target. In half of the block of trials, the fixation or pursuit target was extinguished 200 ms before the saccade target was illuminated (gap trials). Reduction of the mean saccade latency in the gap trials (the “gap effect”) was evident even when the subjects were pursuing a moving target, consistent with previous observations. The effect of pursuit direction on saccade latency was also examined. Saccades in the same direction as the preceding pursuit (forward saccades) had shorter latencies than those in the opposite direction (backward saccades). This asymmetry was observed in both the gap and nongap trials. Although the forward-backward asymmetry was much smaller than the “gap effect”, it was statistically significant in six of eight cases. These results suggest that the preparation of saccades is affected by smooth-pursuit eye movements.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...