Library

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    When should bone density measurements be repeated? (1994)
    Springer
    Calcified tissue international 55 (1994), S. 243-248 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-0827
    Keywords: Osteoporosis ; Bone density ; Longitudinal studies ; Statistical models ; Decision models
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine , Physics
    Notes: Abstract We calculated how long to wait before repeating bone mineral density (BMD) measurements to reassess fracture risk. Correlation results from serial measurements of 495 postmenopausal Japanese-American women were used to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for future BMD. After 7 years of follow-up, BMD correlations with the initial measurement ranged between 0.81 and 0.94, depending on age group and measurement site. In this analysis, the period between measurements was defined as the time required for the lower 95% CI to fall below the BMD value corresponding to doubling of fracture risk. Progressive bone loss causes fracture risk to double after 10 years, on average. However, the 95% CIs indicate that a second BMD measurement will detect risk doubling after only 2 or 3 years for some women. For untreated, early postmenopausal women, the period between measurements was approximately 2–5 years for the radius and 4–6 years for the calcaneus, depending on the initial BMD level. The period was approximately 1 year longer for women age 60 and older. Treatments that halve the bone loss rate would increase the period by 1–3 years. In the absence of a second measurement of BMD, the CI will continue to expand with time, corresponding to a wider range in risk between individuals, and a greater proportion of women will be at increased fracture risk. Obtaining a second BMD measurement pinpoints the patient's status within the precision of the measurement. We conclude that repeated BMD measurements will provide a more accurate estimate of fracture risk than a single, baseline measurement.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00310399
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Relation of height and weight to the regional variations in bone mass among Japanese-American men and women (1995)
    Springer
    Osteoporosis international 5 (1995), S. 234-238 
    Details
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Anthropometry ; Bone mass ; Height ; Osteoporosis ; Weight
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract We examined the magnitude of regional variations in bone mass among elderly, Japanese-American men and women. All subjects had bone measurements at the calcaneus, and at the distal and proximal radius sites. A subset of the women had, in addition, spine bone mass measurements. To provide a common measurement scale, the bone measurements were converted to age- and sex-specificZ-scores. TheZ-scores between pairs of bone sites were then subtracted to yield the differences in bone mass between bone sites (expressed inZ-score units). For most individuals the differences were less than 1.0Z-score; however, 12%–20% of the differences were at least 1Z-score apart. The most similar sites were the distal and proximal radius: different regions within the same bone. Among the other bone pairs, the calcaneus and spine were the most similar to one another. The magnitudes of the differences in bone mass were associated with height and weight. Heavier subjects, for instance, had greater calcaneus than radius bone mass measurements, and greater spine than radius measurements. The spine and calcaneus are more weight-bearing than the radius sites. Associations were observed up to 0.25Z-score per 10 kg difference in weight. Height was associated with bone mass differences in an opposite direction to weight. Taller subjects had greater bone mass at the radius sites than expected from their calcaneus or spine bone measurements (0.1 to 0.2Z-score difference per 5 cm difference in height). Bone width partly explained the associations with height; that is, adjusting the radius widths reduced the associations with height. Overall, our results indicate that small to moderate differences between bone sites were common among our study population, and that the magnitudes of the differences were associated with height and weight.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01774012
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Evaluation of adverse health outcomes associated with vertebral fractures (1991)
    Springer
    Osteoporosis international 1 (1991), S. 134-140 
    Details
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Osteoporosis ; Pain and disability ; Psychosocial problems ; Risk analysis ; Statistical methods ; Vertebral fractures
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Little is known about the frequency or degree to which vertebral fractures cause pain and physical disability. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the advantages of risk analysis over other statistical techniques (e.g., correlation analysis) for quantifying relationships between vertebral fractures and outcomes such as pain and disability. Subjects who volunteered to participate in studies of osteoporosis were asked about pain and disability. The number and degree of vertebral deformities were assessed from radiographs. Strong associations were observed between the most severe vertebral deformities and the risk of high pain or disability scores, while weaker associations were observed for moderate deformities. There did not appear to be any association between vertebral deformity and risk of moderate levels of pain or disability. Because of the potential for bias in cross-sectional studies such as this, the magnitude of these findings must be considered tentative. We conclude that risk analysis is an appropriate method for quantifying the relationship of vertebral fractures with pain and disability, but that prospective studies are now needed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01625442
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...