Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0584
    Keywords: Thrombin-antithrombin III complex ; Prothrombin fragment 1+2 ; Blood withdrawal technique ; Catheter ; Venipuncture
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary To evaluate the influence of different blood sampling techniques on test results of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) serial determinations were performed. In six groups of nonrandomized patients (ten patients each) the concentrations of the coagulation markers of blood samples from central catheters (internal jugular, caval, Shaldon, pulmonary artery) and peripheral cannulas (17G and 18G) were compared with those of blood samples obtained simultaneously from direct venipunctures of the contralateral arm. Medians and 25th–75th percentiles of TAT and Fl+2 concentrations of plasmas obtained from central catheters were not different from those taken from venipunctures. When Δ mean values (catheter — venipuncture) were calculated negative results were obtained, indicating lower concentrations measured from blood sampled through central catheters with the exception of blood that taken from Shaldon catheters. Only for TAT concentrations significantly were lower values measured in blood samples taken from internal jugular catheters when compared with blood samples obtained from direct venipunctures. Significantly higher TAT concentrations were determined in blood samples obtained from Shaldon catheters. For both coagulation markers correlations were found between concentrations in blood samples from central catheters and venipunctures. In blood samples taken from peripheral venous cannulas only F1+2 concentrations correlated with the concentrations found in samples from direct venipuncture. In contrast to F1+2, TAT concentrations measured from blood samples via peripheral cannulas were determined significantly higher than those taken from direct venipunctures. Blood drawn from peripheral catheters is not suited for the determination of TAT and F1+2 due to frequently encountered activation of coagulation, while blood sampling with central catheters can be regarded as an alternative to venipuncture.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-0584
    Keywords: Intracoronary stenting ; Aggressive anticoagulation ; Subacute occlusion ; Bleeding complication ; Prothrombin fragment 1+2
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Patients with intracoronary stent implantation are treated with aggressive anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy consisting of high-dose heparin, phenprocoumon, acetylsalicylic acid, dipyridamole, and the infusion of dextran to prevent a subacute thrombotic occlusion of the stented segment. In an effort to optimize this treatment by reducing both imminent bleeding complications and subacute thrombotic occlusion, the concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) were determined after intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in 19 consecutive patients. The F1+2 concentrations after stent implantation and before the initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) were 0.35 nm/l and 0.25–0.53 nm/l (median and 25th–75th percentile), versus 0.74 nm/l and 0.52–0.78 nm/l, in healthy subjects and 0.61 nm/l and 0.30–1.02 nm/l in 15 patients with ongoing proximal DVT. Nine days after initiation of OAT, F1+2 concentrations in both patient groups had not yet reached levels observed in patients with OAT in the stable state (0.16 nm/l, 0.12–0.26 nm/l;n=76;P〈0.0001 compared with healthy subjects; INR 2.0–4.5). Despite an INR greater than 2.0, accompanying heparinization was terminated on day 9. In two stented patients a minor bleeding complication arose after the removal of the arterial catheter. Subacute thrombotic occlusions were not observed. Since F1+2 concentrations did not exceed the upper limit of normal range (1.11 nm/l) in any of the 19 patients, the therapeutic regimen was not changed. Monitoring F1+2 may thus be helpful in introducing a more individual treatment if aggressive anticoagulation has to be performed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...