Library

Language
Preferred search index
Number of Hits per Page
Default Sort Criterion
Default Sort Ordering
Size of Search History
Default Email Address
Default Export Format
Default Export Encoding
Facet list arrangement
Maximum number of values per filter
Auto Completion
Feed Format
Maximum Number of Items per Feed
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • chemotherapy  (1)
  • 1
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: chemotherapy ; drug interaction ; in vitroassay
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Chemotherapy using multi-drug regimens is consideredmore active than single-agent therapy. This may be due to synergisticinteractions or, simply, a higher probability of administering an activeagent. We investigated in vitrothe type of drug interactions in arecognized regimen in relationship to tumour type and drug sensitivity. Patients and methods: The possibility of synergistic and additiveinteractions between individual cytotoxic drugs was investigated for thecomponent drugs of the established FEC regimen, i.e., 5-fluorouracil,epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, in 243 patient tumour samples representingvarious drug sensitivity using the non-clonogenic fluorometric microculturecytotoxicity assay. Results: Using a cell survival of ≤50% as a limit fordrug activity and sample sensitivity, the overall response rates to the mostactive single drug (Dmax) and the combination were 56% and64%, respectively, with a distribution among diagnoses similar to thatin the clinic. For 86% of the samples there was concordance withrespect to judgement of activity using either Dmax or thecombination. For samples being sensitive to at least one single drug,95% were also sensitive to the combination whereas for samples withinsignificant Dmax effect, only 2% were sensitive to thecombination. In samples with modest Dmax effects, i.e., cellsurvival in the range 〉50%–≤80%, 45%responded to the combination. The effect of the combination was generally wellpredicted from the Dmax effect. Conclusions:The superior antitumour effect of drug combinationscompared with single drugs may be due to the higher chance of selecting anactive agent. However, for intermediately sensitive tumours, additionalinteraction effects of a combination may be of clinical significance.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...