Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and seasonal activity of Chihuahua desert ant communities

La structure et l'activité saisonnière des sociétés de fourmis de la région désertique de Chihuahua

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a desert area with abundant annual plants the largest feeding guild was gramnivores (nine species). In an area with few annual plants, the largest feeding guild was omnivores (eight species). Within a guild there is little overlap in body length of workers. Species in which there was overlap in body length of workers exhibited marked differences in diel and seasonal activity. Variation in precipitation and productivity between years resulted in differences in seasonal activity, hence considerable variation in the structure of the ant community through time.

Résumé

Dans une région désertique où les plantes annuelles sont abondantes, les sociétés de Fourmis granivores sont les plus nombreuses (neuf espèces). Dans une région où les plantes annuelles sont rares, les sociétés les plus fréquentes sont omnivores (huit espèces). Au sein d'une même société, il y a peu de différences dans la taille des ouvrières. Les espèces où la taille des ouvrières varie beaucoup, présentent des différences importantes dans leur activité journalière et saisonnière. Des variations de pluviosité et de productivité d'une année à l'autre engendrent des variations d'activité saisonnière, et, par conséquent, des différences importantes dans la structure de la société de Fourmis tout au long de l'année.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baroni-Urbani (C.), 1969. — Ant communities of the high altitude Appennine grasslands.Ecology, 50, 488–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benois (A.), 1973. — Incidence des facteurs écologiques sur le cycle annuel et l'activité saisonnière de la Fourmi d'Argentine,Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), dans la région d'Antibes.Ins. Soc., 20, 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein (R. Z.), 1974. — Seasonal food abundance and foraging activity in some desert ants.Am. Nat., 108, 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian (M. V.), 1964. — Ant distribution in a southern English heath.J. Anim. Ecol., 33, 451–461.—Brian (M. V.), 1956. The natural density ofMyrmica subra and associated ants in West Scotland.Ins. Soc., 3, 474–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam (G.) andCurtis (J.), 1956. — The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling.Ecology, 37, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton (W. S.), 1950. — The Ants of North America.Bull. Comp. Zool., Harv. Univ., 104, 1–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver (D. C.), 1974. — Species packing in Caribbean and north temperate ant communities.Ecology, 55, 974–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson (D. W.), 1977. — Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants.Ecology (in press).

  • Debruyn (G. J.) andKruk-Debruin (M.), 1972. — The diurnal rhythm in a population ofFormica polyctena Forst.Ekol. Pol., 20, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton (F. E.), 1972. — Climatic guide, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1851–1971.N. M. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rept., 230, 20 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levieux (P. J.), 1975. — Food of tropical ants. I. Activity cycle and diet ofCamponotus solon (Forel) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Ins. Soc., 22, 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins (R.), Pressick (M. S.) andHeatwole (H.), 1973. — Coexistence patterns in insular ants.Am. Sci., 61, 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markin (G. P.), O'Neal (J.) Dillier (J. H.) andCollins (H. L.), 1974. — Regional variation in the seasonal activity of the imported fire ant,Solenopsis saevissima richteri.Environ. Entomol., 3, 446–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey (E. S.), 1972. — Rhythm characters distinguish certain genera of ants.Am. Zool., 12, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers (L. E.), 1974. — Foraging activity of the western harvester ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem.Environ. Entomol., 3, 420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders (C. J.), 1972. — Seasonal and daily activity patterns of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) in northwestern Ontario (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Can. Entomol., 104, 1681–1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher (A.) andWhitford (W. G.), 1974. — The foraging ecology of two species of Chihuahuan desert ants:Formica perpilosa andTrachymyrmex smithi neomexicanus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Ins. Soc., 21, 317–330.—Schumacher (A.) andWhitford (W. G.), 1976. — Spatial and temporal variation in Chihuahuan desert ant faunas.Southwest. Nat., 21, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot (M.), 1946. — Daily fluctuations in above ground activity of three species of ants.Ecology, 27, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford (W. G.), 1975. — Jornada Validation Site Report, US/IBP Desert Biome Res. Memo., 15–4.Utah State University, édit., Logan, 104 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford (W. G.) andEttershank (G.), 1975. — Factors affecting foraging activity in Chihuahuan desert harvester ants.Environ. Entomol., 4, 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitford, W.G. Structure and seasonal activity of Chihuahua desert ant communities. Ins. Soc 25, 79–88 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224487

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224487

Keywords

Navigation