Skip to main content
Log in

Ignition and Opposed Flow Flame Spread Using a Reduced Scale Attachment to the Cone Calorimeter

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A reduced scale ignition and flame spread technique (RIFT) was implemented in the cone calorimeter test system to generate thermal and combustibility material response parameters normally associated with an intermediate scale test, LIFT. The magnitude of the parameters derived using RIFT compare favorably with those obtained using the standard LIFT apparatus. The results of the modified cone calorimetric system or RIFT can be used to generate more specific material combustibility characteristics associated with materials burning over time, helping to create and refine engineering models of solid phase combustion. When validated, such models would help us predict and control flame spread with more certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azhakesan, M. A., Shields, T. J. and Silcock, G. W. H., “Combustibility Related Parameters for Reaction to Fire Test Translations,” Journal of Fire Science, Vol. 6,No. 4 (1996–97), pp 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azhakesan, M. A., Shields, T. J., And Silcock, G. W. H., “Towards a Translation and Classification Concept Based on Combustion Calorimetry,” Journal of Fire Science, Vol. 7,No. 1 (1997–98), pp 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shields, T. J., Azhakesan, M. A. and Silcock, G. W. H., “The Creation, Development and Application of a Strategy for the Classification of Building Materials Using a Cone Calorimeter,” Report to Department of the Environment, United Kingdom, Fire SERT Centre, University of Ulster, December 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vandevelde, P., “Comparison between different reaction to fire test methods on wall lining and flooring materials,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 5,No. 2 (1981), pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blachiere, G., Tephany, H., and Trottein, Y., “Fire Reaction Tests in the EEC,” Aux. IRBat Report 744/III/85-EN

  6. Quintiere, J. G., “State of Fire Research and Safety,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1989, pp. 15–28.

  7. Karlsson, B. and Magnusson, S. E., “Combustible Wall Lining: Numerical Simulation of Room Fire Growth and the Outline of a Reliability Based Classification Procedure,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1991, Elsevier Applied Science, pp 667–678.

  8. Quintiere, J., “A Simplified Theory for Generalizing Results from a Radiant Panel Rate of Flame Spread Apparatus,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 5.No. 2 (1981).

  9. Quintiere, J. G. and Harkleroad, M., “New Concepts for Measuring Flame Spread Properties,” Fire Safety Science and Engineering, ASTM STP 882, T.2. 1985, p. 239.

  10. Quintiere, J. G., Harkleroad, M., and Walton, D., “Measurements of Material Flame Spread Properties,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 32 (1983), pp. 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez-Pello, A. C., Hasegawa, H. K., Staggs, K., Lipska-Quinn, A. E., and Alvares N. J., “A Study of the Fire Performance of Electrical Cables,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1991, Elsevier Applied Science, pp. 237–248.

  12. Doyle, M., “Measurements and Analysis of Lateral Flame Spread Using the Bench Scale Cone Calorimeter,” MSc Thesis, Fire SERT, School of the Built Environment, October 1994

  13. Silcock, G. W. H., Shields, T J., M. A. Azhakesan, and Doyle, M., “Measurement and Analysis Flame Spread Data Using a Bench Scale Apparatus,” First European Fire Safety Conference, Zurich, 1994.

  14. Janssens, M., “Piloted Ignition of Wood: A Review,” Fire and Materials, Vol 15 (1991), pp. 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dietenberger, M. A., “Experimental and Analytical Protocol for Ignitability of Common Materials,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 19 (1995) pp. 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Babrauskas and Parker, W. J., “Ignitability Measurements with the Cone Calorimeter,” Fire and Materials, Vol 11 (1987), pp. 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Atreya, A., and Abu-Zaid, M., “Effects of Environmental Variation on Piloted Ignition,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1991, Elsevier Applied Science, pp 177–186.

  18. Suzuki, T., Kawamata, M., and Matsumoto, K., “Behaviour of the Reverse Flow in Front of the Leading Edge Spreading over Fuel Soaked Sand in an Air Stream,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1991, Elsevier Applied Science, pp. 227–236.

  19. Quintiere, J., “A Simulation Model for Fire Growth on Materials Subject to a Room-Corner Test,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 20 (1993), pp.313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeno, K., and Hirano, T., “Delayed Extinction of Flames Spreading Downward over Paper Sheets,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1989, pp. 99–105

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azhakesan, M.A., Shields, T.J. & Silcock, G.W.H. Ignition and Opposed Flow Flame Spread Using a Reduced Scale Attachment to the Cone Calorimeter. Fire Technology 34, 99–115 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015373301828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015373301828

Keywords

Navigation