Skip to main content
Log in

A high incidence of parasitism ofHeliothis SPP. [Lep.: Noctuidae] larvae in cotton in Southeastern Arkansas

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During 1981 and 1982, bollworm,Heliothis zea (Boddie), and tobacco budworm,H. virescens (F.), larvae (n=3,666) were collected from 41 cotton fields near Portland, Arkansas (USA) to assess the occurrence of parasitism. Three strategies were employed to controlHeliothis spp. in these fields: (1) release ofTrichogramma pretiosum Riley; (2) insecticidal control; or (3) inaction (check). Insecticide use in nonchemical control fields was reduced, but not eliminated.Heliothis spp. larvae collected in cotton had higher parasitism rates in 1981 (30.9%) and 1982 (50.1%) than had been reported for cotton since the advent of organochlorine insecticide usage. Four species of larval parasites and 1 species of larval-pupal parasite were recorded. The larval parasiteMicroplitis croceipes (Cresson) comprised 90.6% and 94.5% of all parasitic insects reared from field collectedHeliothis spp. in 1981 and 1982, respectively. No difference (P>0.05) in level of parasitism existed betweenH. zea andH. virescens. Differences between treatments occurred only in 1982 whenH. zea larvae were parasitized at a greater (P<0.05) rate in check fields (68.3%) than in insecticidal control fields (44.3%). Higher levels of larval parasitism in cotton fields may be a consequence of reduced insecticide usage and changes in materials applied, particularly the pyrethroids.

Résumé

Afin d'évaluer la fréquence du parasitisme des larves de la Noctuelle du maïs (Heliothis zea Boddie) et de la Noctuelle du tabac (H. virescens F.), 3.666 larves ont été récoltées dans 41 champs de coton situés près de Portland (Arkansas). Trois méthodes ont été employées pour limiter les populations d'Heliothis spp. dans ces plantations: (1) le lâcher deTrichogramma pretiosum Riley; (2) la lutte chimique; (3) la non-intervention (témoin). L'emploi des insecticides dans les plantations non protégées chimiquement fut réduit, mais pas totalement éliminé. Les larves d'Heliothis spp. récoltées sur coton avaient des taux de parasitisme supérieurs en 1981 avec 30,9% et en 1982 avec 50,1% à ceux qui avaient été rapportés avant l'utilisation sur coton des insecticides organochlorés. Quatre espèces de parasites larvaires et une cinquième attaquant aussi les chrysalides ont été obtenues. Le parasite larvaireMicroplitis croceipes (Cresson) représentait 90,6% en 1981 et 94,5% en 1982 des parasites éclos des larves d'Heliothis récoltées. Il n'existait pas de différence significative (P>0.05) au niveau du degré de parasitisme entre les espècesH. zea etH. virescens. Des différences entre les traitements eurent lieu uniquement en 1982 quand le taux de parasitisme des larves d'H. zea fut plus élevé (P<0.05) dans les plantations témoins (68,3%) que dans cells soumises à une protection chimique (44,3%). Les niveaux plus élevés de parasitisme larvaire dans les champs de coton peuvent être la conséquence d'une réduction d'emploi des insecticides et de leur remplacement par de nouvelles matières actives, telles que les pyréthrinoïdes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bottrell, D. G., Young, J. H., Sprice, R. G. &Adams, R. H.—1968. Parasites reared fromHeliothis spp. in Oklahoma in 1965 and 1966.—Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 61, 1053–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazzel, J. R., Newsom L. D., Roussel, J. S., Lincoln, C., Williams, F. J. &Barnes, G.—1953. Bollworm and tobacco budworm as cotton pests in Louisiana and Arkansas.—La. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 482, pp. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, J. G. &Farmer, J. H.—1978. Dynamics ofHeliothis spp. larval parasitism in southeast Arkansas.—Environ. Entomol., 7, 692–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delta Agricultural Digest.—1984. (R. P. Lewis ed.)—Delta Agricultural Digest, Inc., Clarksdale, Mississippi.

  • Graham, H. M., Hernandez, N. S. &LLanes, J. R.—1972. The role of host plants in the dynamics of populations ofHeliothis spp.—Environ. Entomol., 1, 424–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K. R. &King, E. G.—1984a. Preference ofMicroplitis croceipes [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] for instars and species ofHeliothis [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae]Environ. Entomol., 13, 1145–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K. R. &King, E. G.—1984b. Feeding and movement on cotton ofHeliothis species [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] parasitized byMicroplitis croceipes [Hymenoptera: Braconidae].—Environ. Entomol., 13, 1654–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. G., Hartley, G. G., Martin, D. F., Smith, J. W., Summers, T. E. &Jackson, R. D.—1979. Production of the tachinidLixophaga diatraeae on its natural host the sugarcane borer, and on its unnatural host, the greater wax moth.—Science and Education Administration Advances in Agricultural Technology, Southern Series, No 3, pp. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. G., Powell, J. E. & Smith, J. W.—1982. Prospects for utilization of parasites and predators for management ofHeliothis spp., pp. 103–122.—InProceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management, 15–20 November 1981, ICRISAT Center Patancheru, A.P., India.

  • Lewis, W. J.—1970. Study of species and instars of larvalHeliothis parasitized byMicroplitis croceipes. —J. Econ. Entomol., 63, 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. J. &Brazzel, J. R.—1968. A three-year study of parasites of the bollworm and tobacco budworm in Mississippi.—J. Econ. Entomol., 61, 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, W. J., Jr., Phillips, J. R., Bernhardt, J. L. &Cochran, M.—1983. An assessment of community-wide bollworm management programs.—Arkansas Farm Res., 32, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pair, S. D., Laster, M. L. &Martin, D. F.—1982. Parasitoids ofHeliothis spp. [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] larvae in Mississippi associated with sesame interplantings in cotton, 1971–1974: Implications of host-habitat interaction.—Environ. Entomol., 11, 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. R., Gutierrez, A. P. &Adkisson, P. L.—1980. General accomplishments toward better insect control in cotton, pp. 123–154.—In: New Technology of Pest Control, (C. B. Huffaker ed.).—John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plapp, F. W., Jr. &Vinson, S. B.—1977. Comparative toxicities of some insecticides to the tobacco budworm and its ichneumonid parasite,Campoletis sonorensis.—Environ. Entomol., 6, 381–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. E. &King, E. G.—1984. Behavior of adultMicroplitis croceipes [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] and parasitism ofHeliothis spp. [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] host larvae in cotton.—Environ. Entomol., 13, 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. E., King, E. G. & Jany, C. S.—Insecticide toxicity to adultMicroplitis croceipes [Hymenoptera: Braconidae].—J. Econ. Entomol., (In Press).

  • Powell, J. E. & Scott, W. P.—Effect of insecticide residues on survival ofMicroplitis croceipes adults [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] in cotton.—Fla. Entomol. (Sci. Note), (In Press).

  • Quaintance, A. L. &Brues, C. T.—1905. The cotton bollworm.—U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Entomol. Bull. No 50, pp. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, R. L. & Lingren, P. D.—1972. Predaceous and parasitic arthropods as regulators ofHeliothis populations, pp. 48–56.—In:Southern Coop. Ser. Bull. No 169, pp. 92.

  • Shepard, M. &Sterling, W.—1972. Incidence of parasitism ofHeliothis spp. [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] in some cotton fields of Texas.—Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 65, 759–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W., King, E. G. &Bell, J. V.—1976. Parasites and pathogens amongHeliothis species in the Central Mississippi delta.—Environ. Entomol., 5, 224–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, J. W., Hamm, J. J. &Brazzel, J. R.—1966.Geranium carolinianum as an early host forHeliothis zea andH. virescens [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] in the southeastern United States, with notes on associated parasites.—Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 59, 506–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, R., Leigh, T. F., Gonzalez, D. &Stinner, R. E.—1969. Cage studies on predators of the bollworm in cotton.—J. Econ. Entomol., 62, 1486–1489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. F., Gudauskas, R. T. &Canerday, T. D.—1966. Parasites, pathogens, and predators of some lepidopterous pests in Alabama.—Auburn University Zoology-Entomology Department Series Entomology No 1, pp. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, W. H. &Bell, K.—1964. Predaceous insects, spiders, and mites of Arkansas cotton fields. —Ark. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 690, pp. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. D., Biever, K. D. &Ignoffo, C. M.—1979. Synthetic pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides against the parasitoidApanteles marginiventris and the predatorsGeocoris punctipes, Hippodamia convergens, andPodisus maculiventris.—J. Econ. Entomol., 72, 473–478.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. H. &Price, R. G.—1975. Incidence, parasitism, and distribution patterns ofHeliothis zea on sorghum, cotton, and alfalfa for southwestern Oklahoma.—Environ. Entomol., 4, 777–779.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, E.G., Powell, J.E. & Coleman, R.J. A high incidence of parasitism ofHeliothis SPP. [Lep.: Noctuidae] larvae in cotton in Southeastern Arkansas. Entomophaga 30, 419–426 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372349

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372349

Key Words

Navigation