Skip to main content
Log in

Streamflow-induced variations in nitrate flux in tributaries to the Atlantic Coastal Zone

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Streamflow-related variability in nutrient flux represents an important source of uncertainty in managing nutrient inputs to coastal ecosystems. Quantification of flux variability is of particular interest to coastal resource managers in adopting effective nutrient-reduction goals and monitoring progress towards these goals. We used historical records of streamflow and water-quality measurements for 104 river monitoring stations in an analysis of variability in annual and seasonal flux of nitrate to the Atlantic coastal zone. We present two measures of temporal flux variability: the coefficient of variation (CV) and the exceedence probability (EP) of 1.5 times the median flux. The magnitude of flux variations spans a very wide range and depends importantly upon the season of year and the climatic and land-use characteristics of the tributary watersheds. Year-to-year variations (CV) in annual mean flux range over two orders of magnitude, from 3–200% of the long-term mean flux, although variations more typically range from 20–40% of the long-term mean. The annual probability of exceeding the long-term median flux by more than 50% (EP) is less than 0.10 in most rivers, but is between 0.10 and 0.35 in 40% of the rivers. Year-to-year variability in seasonal mean flux commonly exceeds that in annual flux by a factor of 1.5 to 4. In western Gulf of Mexico coastal rivers, the year-to-year variablity in the seasonal mean flux is larger than in other regions, and is of a similar magnitude in all seasons. By contrast, in Atlantic coastal rivers, the winter and spring seasons, which account for about 70% of the annual flux, display the smallest relative variability in seasonal mean flux. We quantify the elasticity of nutrient flux to hypothetical changes in Streamflow (i.e., the percent increase in flux per percentage increase in mean discharge) to allow the approximation of flux variability from streamflow records and the estimation of the effects of future climatically-induced changes in Streamflow on nutrient flux. Flux elasticities are less than unity (median = 0.93%) at most stations, but vary widely from 0.05% to 1.59%. Elasticities above unity occur most frequently in the largest rivers and in rivers draining the arid portions of the western Gulf of Mexico Basin. Historical flux variability and elasticity generally increase with the extent of arid conditions and the quantity of nonurban land use in the watershed. We extend the analysis of flux variability to examine several case studies of highly unusual meteorological events capable of significantly elevating nitrate flux and degrading estuarine ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradu D & Mundlak Y (1970) Estimation in lognormal linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65: 198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann UH & Eberlein K (1986) River input of nutrients into the German Bight. In: Skreslet S (Ed) The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems (pp 231–240), Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (1977) The effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system. CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn TA, Caulder DL, Gilroy EJ, Zynjuk LD & Summers RM (1992) The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay. Water Resour. Res. 28: 2353–2363

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn TA, DeLong LL, Gilroy EJ, Hirsch RM & Wells DK (1989) Estimating constituent loads. Water Resour. Res. 25: 937–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunnane C (1978) Unbiased plotting positions: A review. J. Hydrol. 37: 205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Dortch Q (1994) Changes in phytoplankton numbers and species composition. In: Dowgiallo M (Ed) Coastal Oceanographic Effects of Summer 1993 Mississippi River Flooding (pp 46–49). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Special Report, Washington DC

  • Dowgiallo M (Ed) (1994) Coastal Oceanographic Effects of Summer 1993 Mississippi River Flooding. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Special Report, Washington, DC

  • Ferguson RI (1986) River loads underestimated by rating curves. Water Resour. Res. 22: 74–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz HG (1986) Effects of fresh water inflow on the distribution, composition and production of plankton in the Dutch coastal waters of the North Sea. In: Skreslet S (Ed) The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems (pp 241–249), Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy EJ, Hirsch RM & Cohn TA (1990) Mean square error of regression-based constituent transport estimates. Water Resour. Res. 26: 2069–2077

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby DA (1994) Flux of herbicides and nitrate from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico. In: Dowgiallo M (Ed) Coastal Oceanographic Effects of Summer 1993 Mississippi River Flooding (pp 32–35). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Special Report, Washington DC

  • Hirsch RM (1982) A comparison of four record extension techniques. Water Resour. Res. 15: 1781–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jaworski N, Lajtha K, Downing JA, Elmgren R, Caraco N, Jordan T, Berendse F, Freney J, Kudeyarov V, Murdoch P & Zhao-liang Z (1996) Regional Nitrogen Budgets and Riverine Nitrogen Fluxes for the Drainage Systems of the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and Human Influences. Biogeochemistry, in press

  • Jordan RA (1977) Observations of dissolved oxygen conditions in three Virginia estuaries after Tropical Storm Agnes (Summer, 1972). In: The Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (Ed) The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System (pp 348–367), CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch RW & Smillie GM (1986) Bias in hydrologic prediction using log-transformed regression models. Water Resour. Bul. 22: 717–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford RH & Kapinos FP (1979) The national water data network: A case history. Water Resour. Res. 15: 1687–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins HF, Hare RK & Singh KP (1990) Influence of the atmosphere. In: Wolman MG & Riggs HC (Eds) The Geology of North America Volume O–1: Surface Water Hydrology (pp 11–53). The Geological Society of America Inc., Boulder, Colorado

  • Loucks DP, Stedinger JR & Haith DA (1981) Water Resource Systems Planning and Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC & Peck EA (1982) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paerl HW (1987) Dynamics of blue-green algal (Microcystis aeruginosa) blooms in the lower Neuse River, North Carolina: causative factors and potential controls. Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, UNC-WRRI-87-229, Morehead City, North Carolina

  • Queguiner B & Treguer P (1986) Freshwater outflow effects in a coastal, macrotidal ecosystem as revealed by hydrological, chemical and biological variabilities (Bay of Brest, Western Europe). In: Skreslet S (Ed) The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems (pp 219–230), Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais NN, Turner RE & Wiseman WJ (1994) Hypoxic conditions in bottom waters on the Louisiana-Texas shelf. In: Dowgiallo M (Ed) Coastal Oceanographic Effects of Summer 1993 Mississippi River Flooding (pp 50–54). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Special Report, Washington DC

  • Rosenberg R, Lindahl O & Blank H (1988) Silent spring in the sea. Ambio. 17: 289–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Salad E, Sylvester-Bradley R & Victoria RL (1982) Regional gains and losses of nitrogen in the Amazon basin. Plant and Soil 67: 367–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaake JC (1990) From climate to flow. In: Waggoner PE (Ed) Climate Change and the Planning and Management U.S. Water Resources (pp 177–206). Report to the American Assoc. for the Advancement of Science Panel on Climatic Variability. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubel JR & Cronin WB (1977) Effects of Agnes on the distribution of dissolved oxygen along the main axis of the Bay. In: The Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (Eds) The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System (pp 335–347), CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubel JR, Taylor AIR, Grant VE, Cronin WB & Glendening M (1977) Effects of Agnes on the distribution of nutrients in Upper Chesapeake Bay. In: The Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (Eds) The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System (pp 311–319). CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CL, MacIntyre WG, Lake CA & Windsor JG (1977) Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on nutrient flux and distribution in Lower Chesapeake Bay. In: The Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (Eds) The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System (pp 299–310), CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R (1984) The runoff of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds from selected agricultural regions in the Vistula and Odra drainage basins. Oceanologia 18: 135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomann RV, Collier JR, Butt A, Casman E & Linker LC (1994) Technical analysis of response of Chesapeake Bay water quality model to loading scenarios. A report of the modeling subcommittee. Chesapeake Bay Program Office. Annapolis Maryland CBP/TRS 101/94

  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Pub., Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of Census (1983) Census of population and housing 1980: Master area reference file (MARF) 2 [machine-readable datafile]. Washington DC

  • US Soil Conservation Service (1989) Summary report 1987 — National resources inventory. US Soil Conservation Service Statistical Bulletin no. 790

  • Zubkoff PL & Warinner JE (1977) The effect of Tropical Storm Agnes as reflected in Chlorophyll a and heterotrophic potential of the Lower Chesapeake Bay. In: The Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. (Eds) The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System (pp 368–339), CRC Publication No. 54. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, R.B., Murdoch, P.S. & Smith, R.A. Streamflow-induced variations in nitrate flux in tributaries to the Atlantic Coastal Zone. Biogeochemistry 33, 149–177 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181070

Key words

Navigation