Summary
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity was analysed cytophotometrically in oocytes and pre-implantation embryos of mice. A bimodal distribution pattern was not found. Therefore, female and male embryos could not be discriminated on the basis of linkage of the enzyme with the X-chromosome during the pre-implantation period. The dehydrogenase activity in ovulated eggs and pre-implantation embryos up to the 8-cell stage was 65% of that present in follicular oocytes. In morulae and blastulae, the activity was further decreased to a level that was only 10–20% of the activity present in oocytes. The dramatic decrease in dehydrogenase activity could not be explained by modulation of the enzyme molecules, because K M values did not vary strongly. It is unlikely that the abundant activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in oocytes is due to high activity of the pentose phosphate pathway because of the low activity of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, the next step in this pathway. It is concluded that high activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in oocytes is needed for keeping oocytes viable, and for generation of NADPH which is important for the fertilization process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brinster, R. L. (1966) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biochem. J. 101, 161–3.
Brinster, R. L. (1967) Protein content of the mouse embryo during the first five days of development. J. Reprod. Fert. 13, 413.
Butcher, R. G. & VanNoorden, C. J. F. (1985) Reaction rate studies of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in sections of rat liver using four tetrazolium salts. Histochem. J. 17, 993–1008.
DeSchepper, G. G., VanNoorden, C. J. F. & James, J. (1984) Cytochemical determination of gIucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in isolated mouse oocytes. Acta Histochem. suppl. 29, 149–52.
DeSchepper, G. G., VanNoorden, C. J. F. & Koperdraad, F. (1985) A cytochemical method for measuring enzyme activity in individual preovulatory mouse oocytes. J. Reprod. Fert. 74, 709–16.
DeSchepper, G. G., VanNoorden, C. J. F. & HoutkooperJ. M. (1987) Age-related changes of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in mouse oocytes. Histochem. J. 19, 467–70.
Dixon, W. J. (ed) (1990) BMDP Statistical Software. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
Epstein, C. J. (1969) Mammalian oocytes: X chromosome activity. Science 163, 1078–9.
Epstein, C. J., Wegienka, E. A. & Smith, C. W. (1969) Biochemical development of preimplantation mouse embryos: in vivo activities of fructose 1,6-diphosphate aldolase, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase, and lactate dehydrogenase. Biochem. Genet. 5, 71–81.
James, J., Tas, J., Bosch, K. S., DeMeere, A. J. P. & Schutt, H. C. (1979) Growth patterns of rat hepatocytes during postnatal development. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 19, 222–6.
Jonges, G. N. & VanNoorden, C. J. F. (1989) In situ kinetic parameters of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in different areas of the rat liver acinus. Histochem. J. 21, 585–94.
Kozak, L. P. & Quinn, P. J. (1975) Evidence for dosage compensation of an X-linked gene in the 6-day embryo of the mouse. Dev. Biol. 45, 65–73.
Kratzer, P. G. & Chapman, V. M. (1981) X-chromosome reactivation in oocytes of Mus caroli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3093–7.
Lasalle, B. & Testart, J. (1989) Effects of glutathione (GSH and GSSG) and glutathione reductase (GR) on zona-free hamster oocyte ability to decondense human sperm. Gamete Res. 24, 21–30.
Leese, H. J. (1987) Non-invasive methods for assessing embryos. Hum. Reprod. 2, 435–8.
Mangia, F. & Epstein, C. J. (1975) Biochemical studies of growing mouse oocytes: preparation of oocytes and analysis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase activities. Dev. Biol. 45, 211–20.
Mangia, F., Abbo-Halbasch, G. & Epstein, J. (1975) X chromosome expression during oogenesis in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 45, 366–8.
Monk, M. & Handyside, A. H. (1988) Sexing of preimplantation mouse embryos by measurement of X-linked gene dosis in a single blastomere. J. Reprod. Fert. 82, 365–8.
Owen, D. B. (1962) Handbook of Statistical Tables. Reading, MA: Addison-Westley.
Peavy, D. E. & Hansen, R. J. (1979) Influence of diet on the in vivo turnover of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in rat liver. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 586, 22–30.
Pratt, H. P. M. (1987) Isolation, culture and manipulation of pre-implantation mouse embryos. In Mammalian Development - a Practial Approach (edited by Monk, M.) pp. 13–42. Oxford: IRL Press.
Spielmann, H., Erickson, R. P. & Epstein, C. J. (1974) Immunochemical studies of lactate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in preimplantation mouse embryos. J. Reprod. Fert. 40, 367–73.
Swezey, R. R. & Epel, D. (1986) Regulation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in sea urchin eggs by reversible association with cell structural elements. J. Cell Biol. 103, 1509–15.
VanNoorden, C. J. F. (1984) Histochemistry and cytochemistry of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 15, 1–85.
VanNoorden, C. J. F., Tas, J., Vogels, I. M. C. & DeSchepper, G. G. (1982) A new method for the enzyme cytochemical staining of individual cells with the use of a polyacrylamide carrier. Histochemistry 74, 171–81.
VanNoorden, C. J. F., Tas, J. & Vogels, I. M. C. (1983) Cytophotometry of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in individual cells. Histochem. J. 15, 583–99.
Whitten, W. K. & Dagg, C. P. (1961) Influence of spermatozoa on the cleavage rate of mouse eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 148, 173–83.
Wilkinson, G. N. (1961) Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem. J. 80, 324–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Schepper, G.G., Perk, C.V., Westerveld, A. et al. In situ glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity during development of pre-implantation mouse embryos. Histochem J 25, 299–303 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159121
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159121