Skip to main content
Log in

Furaltadone cytotoxicity on three cell lines in the presence or absence of DMSO: Comparison with furazolidone

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrofuran drugs have been studied on cellular systems in order to develop in vitro tests for safety assessment of food contaminants. In the present study we have tested furaltadone on three cell lines (HEp-2, Caco-2 and V79), using the same toxicity endpoints as in a previous study with furazolidone, namely cell viability and growth, colony-forming ability, LDH release, and O2 consumption. One of the aims of this investigation was to compare the two compounds in order to determine whether our models are able to discriminate among structurally related molecules. The other aim was to study the influence of the solvent used on the observed toxicity, because furaltadone is soluble both in water and in DMSO. The results show that the three cell lines used are differently affected by the two compounds, and that, at least in the case of furaltadone, the solvent is not relevant for the observed toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali BH. Effect of furazolidone on tissue sulphydryl groups, ascorbic acid and lipid peroxide levels in the rat, and the influence of dimethylsulphoxide thereon. Pharmacol Res. 1992;25:247–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. Furazolidone, nihydrazone, furaltadone, nitrofurazone withdrawal of proposals and notice of proposed rule making. Fed Regist. 1976;41:34884–921.

  • Arndt K, Haschek M, Jeffery EH. Mechanism of dimethylsulfoxide protection against acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Drug Metab Rev. 1989;20:261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM. A rapid sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance B, Hess B. Metabolic control mechanisms. I. Electron transfer in the mammalian cell. J Biol Chem. 1959;234:2404–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis I, Hoogenboom LAP, Huveneers-Oorsprong MBM, Zucco F, Stammati A. Established cell lines for safety assessment of food contaminants: differing furazolidone toxicity to V79, HEp-2 and Caco-2 cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 1994;32:481–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Hage AN, Herman EH, Ferrans VJ. Examination of the protective effect of ICRF-187 and dimethyl sulfoxide against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in syrian golden hamsters. Toxicology. 1983;28:295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom LAP, Polman THG, Lommen A, Huveneers MBM, Van Rhijn J. Biotransformation of furaltadone by pig hepatocytes and Salmonella typhimurium TA 100 bacteria and the formation of protein-bound metabolites. Xenobiotica. 1994;24:713–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunt TW, Somay C, Pavelka M, Ellinger A, Dittrich E, Dittrich Ch. The effects of dimethyl sulfoxide and retinoic acid on the cell growth and the phenotype of ovarian cancer cells. J Cell Sci. 1991;100:657–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery EH, Haschek WM. Protection by dimethylsulfoxide against acetaminophen-induced hepatic, but not respiratory toxicity in mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1988;93:452–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DR, Allison DP, Rorvik MC, Slaga TJ. Inhibited morphological terminal differentiation and enhanced proliferation of cultured mouse epidermal cells at different concentrations of dimethyl sulphoxide. Cell Prolif. 1991;24:191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki T, Hayakawa Y, Suzuki K, Suzuki M, Watanabe R. Radioprotective effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in golden hamster embryo cells exposed to rays at 77 K. I. Radical formation as studied by electron spin resonance. Radiat Res. 1990;124:66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repine J, Eaton J, Anders M, Hoidal J, Fox R. Generation of hydroxyl radical by enzymes, chemicals and human phagocytes in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1979;64:1642–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapora O, Barone F, Belli M, Maggi A, Quintiliani M, Tabocchini MA. Relationships between cell killing, mutation induction and DNA damage in X-irradiated V79 cells: the influence of oxygen and DMSO. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991;60:467–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawai M, Takase K, Teraoka H, Tsukada K. Reversible G1 arrest in the cell cycle of human lymphoid cell line by dimethyl sulfoxide. Exp Cell Res. 1990;187:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegers C-P. Antidotal effects of dimethyl sulphoxide against paracetamol-, bromobenzene-, and thioacetamide-induced hepato-toxicity. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1978;30:375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Suzuki M, Suzuki K, Hayakawa Y, Miyazaki T. Radioprotective effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in golden hamster embryo cells exposed to rays at 77 K. II. Protection from lethal, chromosomal and DNA damage. Radiat Res. 1990;124:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stammati, A., Zampaglioni, F. & Zucco, F. Furaltadone cytotoxicity on three cell lines in the presence or absence of DMSO: Comparison with furazolidone. Cell Biol Toxicol 13, 125–130 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CBTO.0000010397.26120.4d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CBTO.0000010397.26120.4d

Navigation