Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat Use of Fish Communities in A Virginia Stream System

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fish habitat use during summer was examined at micro- and meso-levels, to determine species associations in the upper Roanoke River watershed, Virginia. Based on multivariate-mesohabitat analysis and examination of mean microhabitat use, seven habitat-use guilds were apparent. These included four rheophilic (fast-riffle, riffle/run, fast-generalist, and shallow-rheophilic) and three limnophilic guilds (pool/run, open-pool, and pool-cover) that were reasonably robust across two river segments and two years. Although simple-hydraulic, bottom-topographic, and turbulence variables all segregated fish habitat-use guilds, turbulence variables were redundant with simple-hydraulic variables, substratum use by limnophilic fishes was related to availability, and only one guild consistently selected high cover levels. At the family level, suckers, darters, and especially minnows were notable for occupying several habitat-use guilds, because of species differences in habitat preferences. Such formulation of guilds can simplify habitat-impact analyses in biodiverse, warmwater streams, via focus on habitat needs of guilds rather than on individual species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Aadland, L.P. 1993. Stream habitat types: their fish communities and relationship to flow. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 13: 790–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier, P.L. 1987. Spatiotemporal variation in habitat selection by fishes in small Illinois streams. pp. 52–60. In: W.J. Matthews & D.C. Heins (ed.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen, D.J., P.B. Bayley & B.W. Menzel. 1994. Importance of the guild concept to fisheries research and management. Fisheries 19(6): 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backiel, T. & R.L. Welcomme (eds). 1980. Guidelines for sampling fish in inland waters. EIFAC (Europ. Inland Fish. Advisory Commiss.) Tech. Pap. 33. 176 pp.

  • Bain, M.B. & J.M. Boltz. 1989. Regulated streamflow and warmwater stream fish: a general hypothesis and research agenda. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 89(18). 28 pp.

  • Bain, M.B. & J.G. Knight. 1996. Classifying stream habitat using fish community analyses. pp. B107–B117. In: M. Leclerc, H. Capra, S. Valentin, A. Boudreault & Y. Côté (ed.) Ecohydraulics 2000, Vol. B, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Eau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E.K. 1981. About processes which cause evolution of guilds and species. Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, H.L. Jr. 1989. Fish-habitat association in an Ozark stream. Env. Biol. Fish. 24: 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, W.J., D.J. Orth & R.K. Smith. 1999. Habitat of the riverweed darter, Etheostoma podostemone Jordan, and the decline of riverweed, Podostemone ceratophyllum, in the tributaries of the Roanoke River, Virginia. J. Freshw. Ecol. 14: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolloff, C.A. 1987. Seasonal population characteristics and habitat use by juvenile coho salmon in a small southeast Alaska stream. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 116: 829–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.E. 1987. An ecomorphological analysis of niche packing and niche dispersion in stream-fish clades. pp. 144–149 In: W.J. Matthews & D.C. Heins (ed.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.E. & W.J. Matthews. 1992. Does morphology predict ecology? Hypothesis testing within a freshwater stream fish community. Oikos 65: 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K.D., J. Lyons, J.R. Karr & P.L. Angermeier. 1990. Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 8: 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon & B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 526 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J.A. & J.M. Nestler. 1988. Instream flow studies in perspective. Reg. Rivers Res. Manage. 2: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groshens, T.P. & D.J. Orth. 1993. An assessment of the transferability of habitat suitability criteria for smallmouth bass. Va. Wat. Resour. Res. Center Bull. 180. 104 pp.

  • Grossman, G.D. & M.C. Freeman. 1987. Microhabitat use in a stream fish community. J. Zool. Lond. 212: 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C.P., L.J. Gottschalk & S.S. Brown. 1988. Densities and habitat of tailed frog tadpoles in small streams near Mt. St. Helens following the 1980 eruption. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 7: 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich, L.A., K.W. Nutt & D.L.Weigmann. 1991. Habitat selection by spawning redbreast sunfish in Virginia streams. Rivers 2: 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbold, B. 1984. Structure of an Indiana fish association: choosing an appropriate model. Amer. Nat. 124: 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaksić, F.M. 1981. Abuse and misuse of the term 'guild' in ecological studies. Oikos 37: 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R.E. & N.M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. 1079 pp.

  • Jenkins, R.E. & C.A. Freeman. 1972. Longitudinal distribution and habitat of the fishes of Mason Creek, an upper Roanoke River drainage tributary, Virginia. Va. J. Sci. 23: 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D.S. 1888. Report of explorations made during the summer and autumn of 1888, in the Alleghany region of Virginia, North Carolina and Tennessee, and in western Indiana, with an account of the fishes found in each of the river basins of those regions. Bull. U.S. Fish. Commiss. 8: 97–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandem Toham, A. & G.G. Teugels. 1997. Patterns of microhabitat use among fourteen abundant fishes of the lower Ntem River Basin (Cameroon). Aquat. Liv. Resour. 10: 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larimore, R.W. & D.D. Garrels. 1985. Assessing habitats used by warmwater stream fishes. Fisheries 10(2): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.S. 1977. The darters of Maryland. Md. Cons. 53(4): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P.M. & D.J. Orth. 1988. Use of habitat guilds of fishes to determine instream flow requirements. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 8: 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobb, M.D. III & D.J. Orth. 1991. Habitat use by an community of fish in a large warmwater stream. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, J.A. & D.J. Orth. 1993. Reproductive ecology of redbreast sunfish Lepomis auritus in a Virginia stream. J. Freshw. Ecol. 8: 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J. 1985. Critical current speeds and microhabitats of the benthic fishes Percina roanoka and Etheostoma flabellare. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J., J.R. Bek & E. Surat. 1982. Comparative ecology of the darters Etheostoma podostemone, E. flabellare, and Percina roanoka in the upper RoanokeRiver drainage,Virginia. Copeia 1982: 805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, D.L. 1987. Niche relations within an Ozark stream cyprinid community. Env. Biol. Fish. 18: 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G.K. & A.L. Sheldon. 1988. The influence of habitat structure on fish community composition in southeastern blackwater streams. Amer. Midl. Nat. 120: 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & H.W. Li. 1979. Community ecology and predator-prey relations in warmwater streams. pp. 171–180. In: R.H. Stroud & H. Clepper (ed.) Predator-Prey Systems in Fisheries Management, Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, D.J. 1987. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models. Reg. Rivers Res. Manage. 1: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, D.J. 1995. Food web influences on fish population responses to instream flow. Bull. Fr. Peche Piscic. 337–339: 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, J.N. 1985. Physical habitat evaluation of small stream fishes: point vs. transect, observation vs. capture methodologies. J. Freshw. Ecol. 3: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T.H. & L.J. O'Neil. 1985. Species selection for habitat assessments. Trans. N. Amer. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 50: 352–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. 1978. Schooling fishes. Amer. Sci. 66: 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surat, E.M., W.J. Matthews & J.R. Bek. 1982. Comparative ecology of Notropis albeolus, N. ardens, and N. cerasinus (Cyprinidae) in the upper Roanoke River drainage, Virginia. Amer. Midl. Nat. 107: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.M., M.R. Winston & W.J. Matthews. 1993. Fish species-environment and abundance relationships in a Great Plains river system. Ecography 16: 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L., Jr. 1992. Seasonal habitat use, species associations, and community structure of forage fishes in Goose Creek, northern Virginia. II. Mesohabitat patterns. J. Freshw. Ecol. 7: 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L. Jr. 1994. Habitat tools for assessing instream-flow needs for fishes in the upper Roanoke River, Virginia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. 346 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L., Jr. & D.J. Orth. 1993. Anewtechnique for estimating the abundance and habitat use of stream fishes. J. Freshw. Ecol. 8: 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L. Jr. & D.J. Orth. 1997. Species associations and habitat use of stream fishes: the effects of unaggregated-data analysis. J. Freshw. Ecol. 12: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L. Jr. & D.J. Orth. 1998. Use of physical variables to discriminate visually determined mesohabitat types in North American streams. Rivers 6: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R.L. Jr. & D.J. Orth. 2000. Formulation of habitat suitability models for stream-fish guilds: do the standard methods work? Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. (in press).

  • Vadas, R.L. Jr. & D.L. Weigmann. 1993. The concept of instream flow and its relevance to drought management in the James River basin. Va. Wat. Resour. Res. Center Bull. 178. 78 pp.

  • Whittier, T.R. & D.L. Miller. 1986. Stream fish communities revisted: a case of mistaken identity. Amer. Nat. 128: 433–437.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadas, R.L., Vadas, R.L. & Orth, D.J. Habitat Use of Fish Communities in A Virginia Stream System. Environmental Biology of Fishes 59, 253–269 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007613701843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007613701843

Navigation