Skip to main content
Log in

People's Biodiversity Registers: Lessons Learnt

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People's Biodiversity Registers (PBR) document folk knowledge of status, uses, history, ongoing changes and forces driving changes in biodiversity resources, gainers and losers in these processes and people's perceptions of how these resources should be managed. A number of PBRs have been prepared in different parts of India beginning 1995 through initiatives of NGOs and educational institutions working with local communities and village councils. These attempts have been motivated by a desire to promote decentralised systems of management of natural resources and to create the basis for equitable sharing of benefits of commercial utilisation of folk knowledge of uses of biodiversity. The documents bring together important locality specific information on biodiversity resources and ecological processes affecting them. They lead to recognition of conservation oriented local practices such as protection of sacred groves. They help mobilise local communities to prudently manage local biodiversity resources in ways that would promote social justice. It is however important to recognise that not all folk knowledge may be valid, nor all folk practices wise, and to create systems of careful assessment of the material. There are many encouraging signs globally, as well as within India, such as the coming in force of the Convention on Biological Diversity, forces promoting decentralised democratic systems of governance and institutions of co-management of natural resources which suggest that programmes like PBR will have an important role to play in promoting conservation, sustainable use and equitable sharing of benefits of biodiversity resources in the coming decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1998) The Draft Indian Biological Diversity Act, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Chambers, R. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, B., and Chaturvedi, S. (1998) Implications of the Regime of Intellectual Property Protection for Biodiversity: A Developing Country Perspective, RISNOPC, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutfield, G. (1999) Intellectual Property Rights and Plant Genetic Resources with Particular Reference to Seeds and Plant Varieties, IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernakulam District Biodiversity Committee (1999) Ernakulam District People's Biodiversity Register, Ernakulam.

  • Gadgil, M. (1996) Peoples biodiversity register: a record of India's wealth, Amruth Spl. Suppl., 1–16.

  • Gadgil, M. (2000) Forging an alliance between formal and folk ecological knowledge, in World Conference on Science. Science for the Twenty first Century-A New Commitment, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Berkes, F. (1991) Traditional resource management systems, Resource Management and Optimisation 18(3–4), 27–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation, Ambio 22, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Hemam, N.S., and Reddy, B.M. (1997) People, refugia and resilience, in C. Folke and F. Berkes (eds), Linking Social and Ecological System, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Meher-Homji, V.M. (1990) Ecological diversity, in J.C. Daniel and J.S. Serrao (eds), Conservation in Developing Countries: Problems and Prospects, Proceedings of the Centenary Seminar of the Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, Bombay, pp. 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Prasad, S.N. (1981) Conservation of Bamboo Resources of Karnataka, Karnataka State Council for Science and Technology, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Rao, P.R.S. (1998) Nurturing Biodiversity: An Indian Agenda, Centre for Environmental Education, Ahmedabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Rao, P.R.S., Utkarsh, G., Chhatre, A., and members of the People's Biodiversity Initiative (2000) New Meanings for Old Knowledge: The People's Biodiversity Registers Programme, Ecological Applications 10(5), 1307–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, Y., Velankar, R., Chandran, M.D.S., and Gadgil, M. (1998) Sacred woods, grasslands and waterbodies as self-organised systems of conservation, in P.S. Ramakrishnan, K.G. Saxena and U.M. Chandrashekara (eds), Conserving the Sacred for Biodiversity Management, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi., pp. 366–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnataka Forest Department (2001) Forest Management Planning Handbook, Karnataka Forest Department, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G.J. (1995) Ethnobotany: A Method's Manual, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Wastelands Development Board (1990) Guidelines for Microplanning, NWDB, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N.C. (1999) The Saga of Participatory Forest Management in India, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B.D. (1997) Tide Turned: The Making of Self Rule in the First Central Law in the Wake of Bhuria Committee Report, Sahayog Pustak Parivar, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPWD-Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development (1992) Joint Forest Management: Field Methods Manual, Vols 1 and 2, New Delhi.

  • Srishti Jigyaasa Pariwar (1998) Let the people speak, The Hindu Survey of Environment '98, 101–137.

  • Srishti Jigyasa Pariwar (2000) Conserving India's biodiversity: let people speak, in S. Singh, A.R.K. Sastry, R. Mehta and V. Uppal (eds), Setting Biodiversity Conservation Priorities for India, Summary of the Findings and Conclusions of the Biodiversity Conservation Prioritisation Project, Vol. II. World Wide Fund for Nature-India, New Delhi, pp. 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gadgil, M. People's Biodiversity Registers: Lessons Learnt. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2, 323–332 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011438729881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011438729881

Navigation