Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting minimal growth conservation of potato microplants in vitro

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combined effects of sucrose, mannitol and photoperiod on microplant conservation were studied in four potato genotypes belonging to two different groups viz., Tuberosum and Andigena. Minimal growth medium was based on Murashige and Skoog (MS) supplemented with 6 different concentrations of sucrose (30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 gl-1) with 4 different concentrations of mannitol (0, 20, 40 and 60 gl-1). The cultures were conserved under two photoperiod conditions i.e. continuous illumination and 16-h photoperiod at 6 ± 1 °C. There were significant interactions between photoperiod and sucrose, and between photoperiod and mannitol. Maximum microplant survival and desirable microplant growth were observed under 16-h photoperiod. Sucrose alone did not improve culture viability over 30 months of storage. Inclusion of mannitol in the conservation medium increased microplant survival. Sucrose x mannitol interaction showed that sucrose was effective in enhancing microplant survival in combination with 20 or 40 gl-1 mannitol, but not with 60 gl-1 mannitol. Combined effect of sucrose, mannitol and photoperiod showed that optimum microplant growth and maximum culture viability were obtained when the cultures were grown in MS medium containing 40 gl-1 sucrose and 20 gl-1 mannitol under 16-h photoperiod. Potato microplants can be conserved in this medium and cultural conditions up to 30 months without subculturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, N. & E. DeLanghe, 1985. A tissue culture technique for rapid clonal propagation and storage under minimal growth conditions of Musa (banana and plantain). Plant Cell Rep. 4: 351–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Y.W. & R.B. Hall, 1986. Low temperature storage of in vitro cultured hybrid poplar, Populus alba × P. grandidenta plantlets. Abstr. VI International Congress of Plant Tissue Culture, p. 13. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, J., 1991. In Vitro methods for Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, R., L. Schilde-Rentschler & N. Espinoza, 1983. In vitro storage of potato germplasm. In: W.J. Hooker (Ed), Research for the Potato in the Year 2000, pp. 80–81. International Potato Centre, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.F., 1994. In what situations is in vitro culture appropriate to plant conservation? Biodiversity Conserv. 3: 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, K.A. & A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grout, B.W.W., 1997. Minimal growth storage. In: B.W.W. Grout (Ed), Genetic Preservation of Plant Cells in Vitro, pp. 21–27. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarraga, R., Z. Huaman & J.H. Dodds, 1989. In vitro conservation of potato germplasm at the International Potato Centre. Amer. Potato J. 66: 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mix, G., 1981. Kartoflelsorten aus dem Reagenzglas-Bedingungen zur Langzeitlagerung. Der Kartoffelbau 31: 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mix, G., 1982. In vitro preservation of potato material. Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett. 51: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mix, G., 1983. Langzeitlagerung von Kartoffelgenmaterial in vitro. Landbauforschung Völkenrode 33(3): 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for the growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radatz, W. & K.-H.C. Standke, 1978. Untersuchungen zum Minimalwachstum von Kartoffeln in vitro. Landbauforschung Völkenrode 28(2): 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca, W.M., R. Chavez, M.L. Martin, D.I. Arias, G. Mafla & R. Reyes, 1989. In vitro methods of germ-plasm conservation. Genome 31: 813–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, D., R. Chandra & P.S. Naik, 1997. Effect of inoculation density on potato micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 48(1): 63–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, S.U., M.F. Chaudhary & R. Anwar, 1996. Studies on the in vitro conservation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm in Pakistan. Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett. 107: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, T.A., 1978. Regulation of organogenesis in vitro. In: K.W. Hugues, R. Henke & M. Constantin (Eds), Propagation of Higher Plants through Tissue Culture, Conference Report 7804111. US Department of Energy, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P-J. & C-Y. Hu, 1985. Potato tissue culture and its application in agriculture. In: P.H. Li (Ed), Potato Physiology, pp. 503–577. Academic Press, London New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, R.J., G.G. Henshaw, B.W.W. Grout & W.M. Roca, 1977. Tissue culture methods and germplasm storage in potato. Acta Horti. 78: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, R.J., 1981a. Tissue culture storage of potato germplasm. 1. Minimal growth storage. Potato Res. 24: 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, R.J., 1981b. Tissue culture storage of potato germplasm. 2. Use of growth retardants. Potato Res. 24: 343–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, D., Naik, P.S. Factors affecting minimal growth conservation of potato microplants in vitro. Euphytica 102, 275–280 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018309300121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018309300121

Navigation