Skip to main content
Log in

Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. I. The Philippines

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urea is the main form of fertilizer nitrogen applied to wetland rice. As part of an effort to evaluate the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers, conventional urea and modified urea products such as sulfur-coated urea (SCU), urea supergranules (USG), and sulfur-coated urea supergranules (SCUSG) were compared with ammonium sulfate on an Aquic Tropudalf at the experimental farm of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines. The sulfur-coated materials were prepared in the laboratory and were not completely representative of commercial SCU. Two experiments were conducted in the wet season (1978, 1979) and one in the dry season (1979). All fertilizers were labeled with 5% or 10% excess15N so that the fertilizer-N balance at two or three sampling times during the growing season could be constructed and the magnitude of N loss assessed. The SCU, USG, and SCUSG were applied at transplanting, and the whole dose of nitrogen was15N-labeled. The urea and ammonium sulfate applications were split: two-thirds was broadcast and incorporated at transplanting, and one-third was broadcast at panicle initiation; only the initial dose was15N-labeled.

Deep-point placement (10 cm) of urea supergranules (USG) between the rice hills consistently provided the highest plant recovery of15N in all experiments and at all harvest times; recoveries ranged from 48% to 75% with an average of approximately 58% at maturity. Among the fertilizers broadcast and incorporated before transplanting, average plant recoveries of15N were only approximately 34% and 26% from urea and ammonium sulfate, respectively. Plant recovery of15N from the broadcast and incorporated SCU (37%) was far inferior to that from USG. Sulfur coating of supergranules did not improve plant recovery over USG alone although sulfur coating delayed the plant uptake of15N from the USG.

The15N not accounted for in the plant and soil was presumed lost. Loss of N from urea and ammonium sulfate was high (63%) in the dry season. Coating with sulfur gave a slight improvement, and deep placement of USG and SCUSG greatly reduced the losses. Losses of N were substantially lower in the wet season than in the dry season for broadcast and incorporated urea, SCU, and ammonium sulfate (9%–30%), whereas losses from deep-placed urea remained more or less the same as in the dry season. Net immobilization of15N from the broadcast fertilizers in the wet season ranged from 49% to 53% in the first experiment and from 16% to 32% in the second experiment, presumably because of aquatic weeds and green algae; immobilization was proportionally less at higher rates of fertilizer application. Deep placement reduced the extent of15N immobilization in the soil plus roots to less than 21% in all experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouldin DR and Alimagno BV (1976) NH3 volatilization losses from IRRI paddies following broadcast applications of fertilizer nitrogen. Int Rept IRRI, Manila, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen. In Black CA, ed. Method of soil analysis II. Madison, Wisc.: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buresh R, Austin ER and Craswell ET (1982) Analytical methods in15N research. Fert Res 3, 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byrnes BH, Vlek PLG and Craswell ET (1979) The promise and problems of urea supergranules for rice production. In Final INPUTS review meeting, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen RY and Zhu ZL (1982) Characteristics of the fate and efficiency of nitrogen in supergranules of urea. Fert Res 3, 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craswell ET and Castillo EG (1979) A convenient device for taking large undisturbed samples of paddy soil. Int Rice Research Newsletter 4, 22

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craswell ET and Vlek PLG (1979a) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen applied to wetland rice. In nitrogen and rice, pp. 175–192. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craswell ET and Vlek PLG (1979b) Greenhouse evaluation of nitrogen fertilizers for rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43, 1184–1188

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craswell ET and De Datta SK (1980) Recent developments in research on nitrogen fertilizers for rice. IRRI Research Paper Series 49, p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Craswell ET, De Datta SK, Hartantyo M and Obcemea WN (1981) Time and mode of nitrogen fertilizer application to tropical wetland rice. Fert Res 2, 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Datta SK (1981) Principles and practices of rice production. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Datta SK and Gomez KA (1981) Interpretive analysis of the international trials on nitrogen fertilizer efficiency in wetland rice. In Fertilizer international, pp. 1–5. The British Sulphur Corp. Ltd., Parnell House, England

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Datta SK, Magnaye CP and Magbanua JT (1969) Response of rice varieties to time of nitrogen application in the tropics. In Proceedings of the symposium on tropical agricultural research, pp. 73–87. Tokyo, Japan

  14. De Datta SK, Magnaye CP and Moomaw JC (1968) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen (15N-labelled) for flooded rice. 9th Int Congr Soil Sci, Trans. (Adelaide, Aust.) 4, 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  15. Engelstad OP, Getsinger JG and Stangel PJ (1972) Tailoring of fertilizers for rice. Bulletin Y-52, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freney JR, Denmead OT, Watanabe I and Craswell ET (1981) Ammonia and nitrous oxide losses following applications of ammonium sulphate to flooded rice. Aust J Agric Res 32, 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hauck RD and Bremner JM (1976) Use of tracers for soil and fertilizer nitrogen research. Adv Agron 28, 219–266

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huffman EO, Shirley AR Jr, Blouin GM, and Dana GP (1975) Experiments of the Tennessee Valley Authority with sulfur-coated urea and other controlled release fertilizers. TVA Circular Z-59, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Atomic Energy Agency (1978) Isotope studies on rice fertilization. IAEA Tech Rep Ser 181, 1–131

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Atomic Energy Agency (1970) Rice fertilization. A six-year isotope study on nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer utilization. IAEA Tech Rep Ser 108, 1–184

    Google Scholar 

  21. International Rice Research Institute (1979) Summary report on the first and second international trials on nitrogen fertilizer efficiency in rice (1975–1978). International Network on Fertilizer Efficiency in Rice (INFER), Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jansson SL and Persson J (1982) Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. In Stevenson FJ, ed. Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Madison, Wis.: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koyama T, Shibuya M, Tokuyasu T, Shimomura T and Ide K (1977) Balance sheet and residual effects of fertilizer nitrogen in Saga paddy field. In Proceedings of the international seminar on soil environment and fertility management in intensive agriculture (SEFMIA), pp. 289–296. Tokyo, Japan

  24. Krishnappa AM and Shinde JE (1980) Fate of15N-labelled urea fertilizer under conditions of tropical flooded-rice culture. In Soil nitrogen as fertilizer or pollutant, pp. 127–144. IAEA, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li CK and Chen RY (1980) Ammonium bicarbonate used as a nitrogen fertilizer in China. Fert Res 1, 125–136

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martinez A and Diamond RB (1982) Fertilizer use statistics in crop production. Technical Bulletin IFDC-T-24, International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mikkelsen DS, De Datta SK and Obcemea WN (1978) Ammonia volatilization losses from flooded rice soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42(5), 725–730

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitsui S (1954) Inorganic nutrition, fertilization, and soil amelioration for lowland rice. Tokyo: Yokendo, Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patrick WH Jr and Reddy KR (1976) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40, 678–681

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rekhi Rs, Meelu OP and Gupta RK (1982) Lysimeter studies on recovery of15N-labeled urea in wetland rice. Plant and Soil 66, 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roger PA, Kulasooriya SA, Tirol A and Craswell ET (1980) Deep placement: A method of nitrogen fertilizer application compatible with algal nitrogen fixation in wetland rice soils. Plant and Soil 57, 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  32. Savant NK, De Datta SK and Craswell ET (1982) Distribution patterns of ammonium nitrogen and15N uptake by rice after deep placement of urea supergranules in wetland soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46, 567–573

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stangel PJ (1979) Nitrogen requirement and adequacy of supply for rice production. In Nitrogen and rice, pp. 45–69. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vlek PLG and Craswell ET (1979) Effect of nitrogen source and management on ammonia volatilization losses from flooded rice soil systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43, 352–358

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vlek PLG and Craswell ET (1981) Ammonia volatilization from flooded soils. Fert Res 2, 227–245

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vlek PLG and Stumpe JM (1978) Effect of solution chemistry and environmental conditions on ammonia volatilization losses from aqueous systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42, 416–421

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vlek PLG, Stumpe JM and Byrnes BH (1980) Urease activity and inhibition in flooded soil systems. Fert Res 1, 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  38. Watanabe I, Padre BC Jr and Santiago ST (1981) Quantitative study of nitrification in flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 27, 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wetselaar R and Farquhar GD (1980) Nitrogen losses from tops of plants. Adv Agron 33, 263–302

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wetselaar R, Shaw T, Firth P, Oupathum J and Thitipoca H (1977) Ammonia Volatilization losses from variously placed ammonium sulphate under lowland rice field conditions in Central Thailand. In Proceedings of international seminar on soil environment and fertility management in intensive agriculture (SEFMIA), pp. 282–288. Tokyo, Japan

  41. Wilson JT, Eskew DL and Habte M (1980) Recovery of nitrogen by rice from bluegreen algae added in a flooded soil. Soil Sci Soc Am 44, 1330–1331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craswell, E., De Datta, S., Weeraratne, C. et al. Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. I. The Philippines. Fertilizer Research 6, 49–63 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058164

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058164

Keywords

Navigation