Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat integrity of running waters — assessment criteria and their biological relevance

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based upon well-known relations between abiotic and biotic components of river systems, habitat assessment can serve as an indirect procedure to evaluate the ecological integrity by demonstrating the degree of man-induced alterations of the physical environment. Detailed habitat analysis has been an integral part of aut- or synecological investigations in aquatic environments. In many countries, however, the assessment of the physical environment on a larger spatial scale has become a regular part of watershed management programmes. A primary methodological aspect of large-scale habitat assessment is the selection and definition of evaluation criteria specifically designed to identify key functions and processes of intact river systems. Therefore, special emphasis has to be given to integrative parameters, that reflect the spatial and temporal dynamics of running waters as well as the interactions between rivers and their wetlands. Four groups of evaluation criteria are discussed within the framework of their relevance for aquatic biocoenoses and their validity to identify severe human impacts on running water ecosystems: (1) discharge regime; (2) morphological character; (3) lateral connectivity and (4) longitudinal corridor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, J., W. Davis, T. Flanigan, A. Schwarz & M. McCarthy, 1992.Environmental indicators for surface water quality programmes-Pilot Study, EPA-905-R–92–001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, Illinois and Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamicka, P., G. H. Bretschko, E. Danecker, J. Hinteregger, G. Imhof, M. Jungwirth, M. Leichtfried, O. Moog, C. Moritz, G. Müller, R. Pechlaner, E. Pipp, E. Polzer & N. Schulz, 1991. Zur Gewährleistung, Beeinträchtigung und Beurteilung der ökologischen Funktionsfähigkeit von Gewässern. Österreichs Fischerei 45, H. 5/6: 120–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. R. L., 1977. Changeable rivers: some aspects of their mechanics and sedimentation. In K.J. Gregory (ed.), River Channel Changes. Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 15–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoros, C. & A. L. Roux, 1988. Interaction between water bodies within the floodplains of large rivers: function and development of connectivity. In K. F. Schreiber (ed.), Connectivity in Landscape Ecology, Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten 29: 125–130.

  • Bisson, P. A., 1995. Ecosystem and habitat conversation: More than just a problem of geography. American Fisheries Society Symposium 1995: 329–333.

  • Bovee, K. D. & J. Zuboy (eds), 1986. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in instream flow incremental methology. Instream Flow Information Paper 21, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. Biological Report 86(7).

  • Cairns, J., Jr. 1977. Quantification of biological integrity. In R. K. Ballentine & L. J. Guarraia (eds), The Integrity of Water. Proceedings of a Symposium. March 10–12, 1975. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaz, J. W., 1870. Beschreibung der Gemeinde Flims, topographisch, natur-u-und kulturgeschichtlich. Jahresbericht der naturforsch. Ges. Graubündens, Neue Folge, XV: 3–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieplinger, K., S. Leberl & G. Zauner, 1996. Biotope management on the Austrian Danube. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 113, Large Rivers 10: 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dister, E., 1980. Geobotanische Untersuchungen in der Hessischen Rheinaue als Grundlage für die Naturschutzarbeit, PhD, 170 pp.

  • Dister, E., 1983. Zur Hochwassertoleranz von Auwaldbäumen an lehmigen Standorten. Verh. Ges. Ökol. X: 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstaller, J., G. Haidvogl & M. Jungwirth, 1997. Gewässer-& Fischökologisches Konzept Alpenrhein. Grundlagen zur Revitalisierung mit Schwerpunkt Fischökologie. Universität f. Bodenkultur, Abt. Hydrobiologie, Fischereiwirtschaft und Aquakultur. Internationale Regierungskomission Alpenrhein Projektgruppe Gewässer-und Fischökologie (ed.), 90 pp.

  • Gee, J. H. & T. G. Northcote, 1963. Comparative ecology of two sympatric species of Dace (Rhinichthys) in the Fraser River System, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 20: 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A., 1977. Reservoir manipulations and benthic macroinvertebrates in a prairie river. Hydrobiologia 55: 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hügin, G., 1981. Die Auwälder des südlichen Oberrheintals-Ihre Veränderung und Gefährdung durch den Rheinausbau. Landschaft und Stadt 13: 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hütte, M. & U. Bundi, 1995. Methoden zur Bewertung und Entwicklung von Fließgewässern. EAWAG news 39 D: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhof, J. G, J. Fitzgibbon & W. K. Annable, 1996. A hierarchical evaluation system for characterizing watershed ecosystems for fish habitat. In Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 53(Suppl. 1): 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., 1998. River continuum and fish migration-going beyond the longitudinal river corridor in understanding ecological integrity. In: M. Jungwirth, S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., O. Moog & S. Schmutz, 1990. Auswirkungen der Veränderungen des Abflußregimes auf die Fisch-und Benthosfauna anhand von Fallbeispielen. Landschaftswasserbau 10: 195–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303: 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In D. P. Dodge (ed.), Proceedings of the Int. River Symposium, Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. aquat. Sci. 106: 110–127.

  • Karr, J. R. & D. R. Dudley, 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Envir. Management 5: 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeier, P. R. Yant & I. J. Schlosser, 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rationale. Ill. Nat. Hist. Sur., Spec. Publ. 5: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B. & M. G. Wolman, 1957. River channel patterns: braided, meandering and straight. USGS, Reston, VA: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 282-B: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • LFU (Landesanstalt f. Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg), 1994. Übersichtskartierung des morphologischen Zustands der Fließgewässer in Baden-Württemberg 1992/93, Handbuch Wasser 2, 43 pp.

  • LÖLF (Landesanstalt f. Ökologie, Landschaftsentwicklung und Forstplanung NW / Landesanstalt f. Wasser und Abfall NW (LWA), 1985. Bewertung des ökologischen Zustandes von Fließgewässern, Dusseldorf. 1826 pp, 11, 6588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, J., K. Scheurmann & F. H. Weiß, 1980. River Morphology, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 243 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., 1989. Makrobenthologische Aspekte bei der Wiederherstellung naturnaher Flußabschnitte. In M. Jungwirth, S. Muhar & H. Honsowitz (eds), Revitalisierung von Fließgewässern, Wiener Mitteilungen 88: 55–105.

  • Moog, O., 1993. Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts. In Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., M. Jungwirth, S. Muhar & B. Schönbauer, 1993. Berücksichtigung ökologischer Gesichtspunkte bei der Wasserkraftnutzung durch Ausleitungskraftwerke. In Österr. Wasserwirtschaft 45, 7/8: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., M. Kainz & M. Schwarz, 1998a. Ausweisung flußtypspezifisch erhaltener Fließgewässerabschnitte in Österreich-Einzugsgebiete größer 500 km2 ohne Bundesflüsse.-Bundesministerium für Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Bundesministerium f. Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Wasserwirtschaftskataster Wien, 177 pp.

  • Muhar, S., S. Schmutz & M. Jungwirth, 1995. River restoration concepts-goals and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 303: 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., M. Kainz, M. Kaufmann & M. Schwarz, 1996. Ausweisung flußtypspezifisch erhaltener Fließgewässerabschnitte in Österreich-Österreichische Bundesgewässer.-Bundesministerium f. Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Wasserwirtschaftskataster Wien, 167 pp.

  • Muhar, S., G. Egger, M. Jungwirth, K. Michor, Ch. Moritz, J. Petutschnig & M. Unterlercher, 1998b. Leitbilder und Zielsetzungen für die Flusslebensräume der Oberen Drau und deren Biozönosen. Österr. Wasserwirtschaft 50, 1/2: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J. & H. Décamps, 1990. The Ecology and Management of Aquatic Ecotones. Man and the Biosphere Series 4, 316 pp.

  • Northcote, T. G., 1998. Migratory behaviour of fish and its significance to movement through to riverine fish passage facilities. In: M. Jungwirth, S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA, 1992. River Corridor Surveys. Methods and Procedures, Conservation Technical Handbook 1. National Rivers Authority, Bristol.

  • Odeh, M. & C. Orvis, 1998. Downstream fish passage design considerations and development at hydroelectric projects in the Northeast, USA. In: M. Jungwirth, S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford: 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz, P., S. Schmutz & O. Moog, 1998. The effect of managed hydropower peaking on the physical habitat, benthos and fish fauna in the River Bregenzerach in Austria. Fisheries Management and Ecology 5: 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechlaner, R., 1986. Driftfallen und Hindernisse für die Aufwärtswanderung von wirbellosen Tieren in rhithralen Fließgewässern. Wasser und Abwasser 30: 431–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E. D., 1995. Habitat indices in water ressource quality assessments. In W.S. Davis & T.P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers Boca Raton London Tokyo: 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. J., P. Fox, M. Everard, N. T. H. Holmes & F. H. Dawson, 1997. River habitat Survey: A new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality. In P. J. Boon & D. J. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable: 215–234.

  • Schiemer, F., 1988. Gefährdete Cypriniden-Indikatoren für die ökologische Intaktheit von Flußsystemen. In Natur und Landschaft 63(9): 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F., 1995. Struktur und Dynamik als Voraussetzung für eine gesunde Au. In Perspektiven 6/7: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F. & H. Waidbacher, 1992a. Strategies of conservation of a Danubian fish fauna. In P.J. Boon, P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management: 363–382.

  • Schiemer, F. & M. Zalewski, 1992b. The importance of riparian ecotones for diversity and productivity of riverine fish communities. In Neth. J. Zool. 42: 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiders, A., E. Verhaert, G.D. Blust, C. Wils, L. Bervoets & R.F. Verheyen, 1993. Towards an ecological assessment of watercourses. In M. Munawar (ed.), Ecosystem Approach to Water Management. J. aqua. Health 2: 29–38.

  • Sedell, J. R., G. H. Revees & K. M. Burnett, 1994. Development and evaluation of aquatic conservation strategies. J. Forestry 92 (4): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sempeski, P. & P. Gaudin, 1995. Habitat selection by grayling (Thymallus thymallus)II. Preliminary results on larval and juvenile daytime habitats. J. Fish Biol. 47: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A. & J. V. Ward, 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. J. N. Am. Soc. 12(1): 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, R. J. & H. A. Regier, 1990. Ecological basis for an understanding of ecosystem integrity in the Great Lakes Basin. In Proc. Workshop on an Ecosystem Approach to the Integrity of the Great Lakes in Turbulent Times, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Ann Arbor, Mich., Pub. 90–4: 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tockner, K., F. Schiemer & J. V. Ward, 1998. Conservation by restoration: the management concept for ariver-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 8: 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River Continuum Concept. In Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waidbacher, H. & G. Haidvogl, 1998. Fish migration and fish passage facilities in the Danube: past and present. In: M. Jungwirth, S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. 1989. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., & J. A. Stanford, 1983. The intermediate-disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. In: T.D. Fontaine & S.M. Bartell (eds), Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Michigan, 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: Extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., K. Tockner & F. Schiemer, in press. Biodiversity of floodplain river Ecosystems: Ecotones and Connectivity. Regulated Rivers.

  • Zauner, G., 1993. Fischökologische Studie Untere Thaya. Universität f. Bodenkultur, Abt. Hydrobiologie, Fischereiwirtschaft und Aquakultur, i. A. d. Wasserstraßendirektion, 182 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna, Department of Hydrobiology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Max-Emanuelstr., A-1180, Vienna, Austria

    S. Muhar & M. Jungwirth

Authors
  1. S. Muhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Jungwirth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muhar, S., Jungwirth, M. Habitat integrity of running waters — assessment criteria and their biological relevance. Hydrobiologia 386, 195–202 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003588631679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003588631679

Search

Navigation