Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating seed quantity and quality in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) cones from natural stands

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantity and quality of seeds were studied in 886 shortleaf pine cones collected from 48 trees in each of two 15-ha natural stands in western Arkansas, USA. The number of seeds per cone ranged from 0 to 102, and averaged 34.6 and 38.0 in the two stands. Between 30 and 50 percent of the seeds were sound. Overall mean values for total number and total sound seeds compare with previous work. However, the wide variation between individual trees in a stand needs to be considered when evaluating cone abundance and estimating potential seed yields. For the stands observed in this study, a sample of 65 to 85 cones would be needed to estimate the number of sound seeds per cone (within ±3 seeds) with 95 percent probability. Sampling 1 or 2 cones from each of about 3 trees per ha would provide a reliable estimate of sound seed contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, J. B. 1992. Natural regeneration of shortleaf pine, pp. 102–112. In: Proc. Shortleaf Pine Regeneration Workshop. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-90.

  • Barnett, J. P. 1971. Flotation in ethanol reduces storability of southern pine seeds. For. Sci. 17: 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramlett, D. L. and Hutchinson, J. G. 1964. Estimating sound seed per cone in shortleaf pine. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SE-18. 2 pp.

  • Bramlett, D. L., Belcher, E. W. Jr., DeBarr, G. L., Hertel, G. D., Karrfalt, R. P., Lantz, C. W., Miller, T., Ware, K. D. and Yates, H. O. III. 1977. Cone analysis of southern pines – a guidebook. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-13. 28 pp.

  • Coulson, R. N. and Franklin, R. T. 1968. Frequency of occurrence of cone-and seed-destroying insects on shortleaf pine in the Georgia Piedmont. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 1026–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, R. N. and Franklin, R. T. 1970. Populations of Dioryctria spp. (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) in relation to cone destruction. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 5: 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatzinger, C. W., Hertel, G. D., Merkel, E. P., Pepper, W. D. and Cameron, R. D. 1980. Identification and sequential occurrence of mortality factors affecting seed yields of southern pine seed orchards. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-216. 41 pp.

  • Huffman, G. R. 1988. Use of the inventory-monitoring system for shortleaf and eastern white pine cone and seed crops at the Beech Creek Seed Orchard. Tree Planters'Notes 39: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, S. L. and Jenkinson, J. L. 1974. PinusL. Pine, pp. 598–638. In: Seeds of Woody Plants in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Hand. 450.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLemore, B. F. 1962. Predicting yields of southern pine cones. J. For. 60: 639–641. Read, R. A. 1953. Forecasting shortleaf pine seed crops. USDA For. Serv. South. For. Notes No. 85: 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. 1028 pp.

  • Seidel, K.W. 1970. Estimating cone yield of shortleaf pine. Tree Planters' Notes 21(3): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, M. G. and Wittwer, R. F. 1995. Forecasting loblolly and shortleaf pine seed crops. In: Proc. Eighth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conf. 1994 Nov. 1–3, 1994; Auburn, AL. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-1.

  • Shelton, M. G. and Wittwer, R. F. 1996. Seed production in natural shortleaf pine stands in the Ouachita and Ozark Mountains. South. J. Appl. For. 20(2): 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J., Jett, J. B. and Zobel, B. 1979. The management of southern pine seed orchards to increase seed production, pp. 145–162. In: Bonner, F. (Ed) Proc. Flowering and Seed Development In Trees: A Symposium. Mississippi State Univ., May 15–18, 1978.

  • Stein, C. 1945. A two-sample test for a linear hypothesis whose power is independent of the variance. Ann. Math. Stat. 16: 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New York. 481 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword, M. A. and Barnett, J. P. 1992. Research needs for improving shortleaf pine regeneration, pp. 187–190. In: Proc. Shortleaf Pine RegenerationWorkshop. USDAFor. Serv.Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-90.

  • VanHaverbeke, D. F. and Barber, J. C. 1964. Seed crop estimation in a loblolly pine seed production area. Ga. For. Res. Council Res. Pap. 21. 5 p.

  • Yocom, H. A. 1971. Releasing shortleaf pines increases cone and seed production. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SO-125. 2 p.

  • Yocom, H. A. and Lawson, E. R. 1977. Tree percentage from naturally regenerated shortleaf pine. South. J. Appl. For. 1: 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WITTWER, R., TAUER, C., HUEBSCHMANN, M. et al. Estimating seed quantity and quality in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) cones from natural stands. New Forests 14, 45–53 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006528302718

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006528302718

Navigation