Skip to main content
Log in

Gene expression in Brassica campestris showing a hypersensitive response to the incompatible pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians, a pathogen of lettuce, elicits a hypersensitive response within 12 hours of inoculation into Brassica leaves, characterized by tissue collapse, loss of membrane integrity, vein blockage and melanin production. In contrast, the compatible pathogen, X. c. pv. campestris, has no visible effects on leaves for 48 hours, after which inoculated areas show chlorosis which eventually spreads, followed by rotting.

mRNA was prepared from leaves inoculated with suspensions of both pathovars or with sterile medium up to 24 hours following inoculation. In vitro translation of total and poly A+ RNA in rabbit reticulocyte lysate in the presence of 35S methionine followed by separation of the polypeptide products by 2D-PAGE, allowed comparison of the effects of these treatments on plant gene expression. Major changes in gene expression were observed as a consequence of the inoculation technique. In addition, after inoculation with X. c. vitians, up to fifteen additional major polypeptides appeared or greatly increased by four hours. Some of these had disappeared by nine hours and several more had appeared. No major polypeptides disappeared or decreased greatly in intensity following inoculation with X. c. vitians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell AA: Biochemical mechanisms of disease resistance. Ann Rev Pl Physiol 32: 21–81 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolwell GP, Robbins MP, Dixon RA: Metabolic changes in elicitor treated bean cells: Enzymatic responses associated with rapid changes in cell wall components. Eur J Biochem 148: 571–578 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burland TG, Gull K, Schedl T, Boston RS, Dove WF: Cell type-dependent expression of tubulins in Physarum. J Cell Biol 97: 1852–1859 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chamberlain JP: Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal Biochem 98: 132–135 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chua N-H, Bennoun P: Thylakoid membrane polypeptides of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: wild-type and mutant strains deficient in photosystem II reaction centre. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72: 2175–2179 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook DR, Robeson DJ: Active resistance of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) to Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae and protection against the causal agent of black rot X. campestris pv. campestris, by co-inoculation. Physiol Pl Path 28: 41–52 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cornellissen BJC, Hooft van Huijsduijnen RAM, Bol JF: A tobacco mosaic virus-induced tobacco protein is homologous to the sweet-tasting protein thaumatin. Nature 321: 531–532 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Covey SN, Grierson D: Subcellular distribution and properties of poly(a)-containing RNA from cultured plant cells. Eur J Biochem 63: 599–606 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cramer CL, Bell JN, Ryder TB, Bailey JA, Schuch W, Bolwell GP, Robbins MP, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ: Co-ordinated synthesis of phytoalexin biosynthesis enzymes in biologically-stressed cells of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). EMBO J 4: 285–289 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daniels MJ, Barber CE, Turner PC, Sawczyc MK, Byrde RJW, Fielding AH: Cloning of genes involved in pathogenicity of Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris using the broad host range cosmid pLAFR1. EMBO J 3: 3323–3328 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniels MJ, Collinge DB, Dow JM, Osborn AE, Roberts IN: Molecular biology of the interaction of Xanthomonas campestris with plants. Plant Physiol Biochem (in press).

  12. Davies JW: Translation of plant virus ribonucleic acids in extracts from eukaryotic cells. In: Hall TC, Davies JW (eds) Nucleic Acid in Plants, Vol. 2, pp 111–149. Florida: CRC Press (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dennis ES, Gerlach WL, Pryor AJ, Bennetzen JL, Inglis A, Llewellyn D, Sachs MM, Ferl RJ, Peacock WJ: Molecular analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase (adhI) gene of maize. Nucl Acids Res 12: 3983–4000 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dixon RA, Dey PM, Lamb CJ: Phytoalexins: enzymology and molecular biology. Adv Enz 55: 1–135 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dye DW, Lelliot RA: Genus Xanthomonas. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th edn., pp 243–249. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams and Watkins (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Esquerré-Tugayé M-T, Mazau D, Pelissier B, Roby D, Toppan A: Elicitors and ethylene trigger defense responses in plants. In: Fuchs Y, Chalutz E (eds) Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects, pp 217–218. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freeling M, Birchler JA: Mutants and variants of the alcohol dehydrogenase-1 gene in maize. In: Setlow JK, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic Engineering 3, pp 223–263. New York and London: Plenum Press (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fristensky B, Riggleman RC, Wagoner W, Hadwiger LA: Gene expression in susceptible and disease resistant interaction of peas induced with Fusarium solani pathogens and chitosan. Physiol Plant Pathol 27: 15–28 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hadwiger LA, Wagoner W: Electrophoretic patterns of pea and Fusarium proteins synthesized in vitro or in vivo which characterise the compatible and incompatible interactions. Physiol Plant Pathol 23: 153–162 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hahlbrock K, Chappell J, Huhn DN: Rapid induction of mRNAs involved in defense reactions in plants. Ann Proc Phytochem Soc Eur 23: 171–182 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hooft van Huijsduijnen RAM, van Loon LC, Bol JF: cDNA cloning of six mRNAs induced by TMV infection of tobacco and a characterisation of their translation products. EMBO J 5: 2057–2061 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson RJ, Hunt T: Preparation and use of nucleasetreated rabbit reticulocyte lysates for the translation of eukaryotic messenger RNA. Meth Enz 96: 50–74 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jen G, Thach RE: Inhibition of host translation in encephalomyocarditis virus-infected L cells: a novel mechanism. J Virol 43: 250–261 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keen NT, Ersek T, Long M, Bruegger B, Holliday M: Inhibition of the hypersensitive reaction of soybean leaves to incompatible Pseudomonas spp. by blasticidin S, streptomycin or elevated temperature. Physiol Plant Pathol 18: 325–337 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keen NT, Staskawicz BJ: Gene cloning as an approach to understanding specificity in plant-pathogen systems. In: Dugger WM, Bartnicki-Garcia S (eds) Structure, Function and Biosynthesis of Plant Cell Walls, pp 344–358. Proc 7th Symposium of Botany, University of California at Riverside (1984).

  26. Klement Z: Hypersensitivity. In: Mount MS, Lacy GH (eds) Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes, Vol. 2, pp 149–177. New York and London: Academic Press (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuan T-L, Minsavage GV, Schaad NW: Aerial dispersal of Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris from naturally infected Brassica campestris. Plant Disease 70: 409–413 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Manners JM, Davidson AD, Scott KJ: Patterns of post-infectional protein synthesis in barley carrying different genes for resistance to the powdery mildew fungus. Plant Molec Biol 4: 275–283 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martin CR, Northcote DH: Qualitative and quantitative changes in mRNA of castor beans during the initial stages of germination. Planta 151: 189–197 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mauch F, Hadwiger LA, Boller T: Ethylene: symptom, not signal for the induction of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in pea pods by pathogens and elicitors. Plant Physiol 76: 607–611 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. O'Farrell PH: High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 250: 4007–4021 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Osbourn AE, Barber CE, Daniels MJ: Identification of plant-induced genes of the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pathovar campestris using a promoter-probe plasmid. EMBO J 6: 23–28 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riggleman RC, Fristensky B, Hadwiger LA: The disease resistance response in pea is associated with increased levels of specific mRNAs. Plant Molec Biol 4: 81–86 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts IN, Dow JM, Lum K-Y, Scofield G, Barber CE, Daniels MJ: (manuscript submitted).

  36. Shirras AD, Northcote DH: Molecular cloning and characterisation of cDNAs complementary to mRNAs from wounded potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber tissue. Planta 162: 353–360 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Slusarenko AJ, Longland A: Changes in gene activity during expression of the hypersensitive response in Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Red Mexican to an avirulent race 1 isolate of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Phys Molec Plant Pathol 29: 79–94 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Turner PJ, Barber CE, Daniels MJ: Behaviour of the transposons Tn5 and Tn7 in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Mol Gen Genet 195: 101–107 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turner PJ, Barber CE, Daniels MJ: Evidence for clustered pathogenicity genes in Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris. Molec Gen Genet 199: 338–343 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van Loon LC: Pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol 4: 111–116 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wagoner W, Loscke DC, Hadwiger LA: Two dimensional electrophoretic analysis of in vivo and in vitro synthesis of proteins in peas inoculated with compatible and incompatible Fusarium solani. Physiol Plant Pathol 20: 99–107 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weber K, Osborn M: The reliability of molecular weight determination by dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem 244: 4406–4412 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Williams PH: Black rot: a continuing threat to world crucifers. Plant Disease 64: 736–742 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collinge, D.B., Milligan, D.E., Dow, J.M. et al. Gene expression in Brassica campestris showing a hypersensitive response to the incompatible pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians . Plant Mol Biol 8, 405–414 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015818

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015818

Key words

Navigation