Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of soil moisture stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The objective was to find the optimum range of water contents for inducing better growth, physiological efficiency and yield potential of barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L. var. K18). A pot culture experiment was conducted in the Division of Crop Physiology and Biochemistry Kanpur-2. The plants were subjected to various soil moisture stresses,i.e., 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 0.60 and 0.75 atm tension throughout the crop growth period measured by irrometers.

Plants maintained at 0.45 soil moisture tension required 19.07 litre of water and had the best water use efficiency (1765 mg dm/litre of water) which favourably influenced the leaf water balance (85.9%), plant growth as measured by plant height (85.4 cm) and tiller production (35.6) per hill, photosynthetic efficiency (2.185 mg CO2/g dm/h), grain number (722) and grain yield (33.7 g) per hill while plants irrigated at a tension greater than 0.45 SMT did not develop as well. However, protein and gluten percentage increased gradually with the subsequent increase in soil moisture tension. On the other hand respiration rate (2.090 mg CO2/g dm/hr) and leaf area (4375 cm2) were recorded to be the highest at 0.60 and 0.30 atm SMT respectively.

Thus it is suggested that for reaping high harvest of barley crop, the physiological need of water (19.07 litre) in total of plant life should be made available through scheduled irrigation based on maintenance of plant at 0.45 SMT from seeding to maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adams, F. et al. 1942 Calif. Agric. Stn. Bull.668, 3–93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asana, R. D. and Saini, A. D. 1958 Physiol. Plant.31, 266–278.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aspinall, D. et al. 1964 Aust. J. Agric. Res.15, 729–745.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beaumont, J. H. et al. 1927 Plant Physiol.2, 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergman, H. F. 1959 Bot. Rev.25, 427–485.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, W. J. R. and Lee, J. W. 1967 Experimentia23, 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dastur, R. H. and Desai, B. L. 1933 Ann. Bot.47, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denmead, O. T. and Shaw, R. H. 1970 Agron. J.52, 272–274.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagan, R. M. et al. 1957 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.21, 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendrickson, A. H. and Veihmeyer, F. J. 1945 Plant Physiol.20, 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Humphries, C. E. 1956 Modern Methods of Plant analysis 468–502. Peach, K. and Tracy, M. V. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iljin, W. S. 1957 Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.8, 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi, M. S. and Dastane, N. G. 1966. Indian J. Agron.11, 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lerman, R. I. 1956 Poli Akad. Nauk. SSSR108, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lazrov, R. 1965 Bulgaria Rast Nauk.2 (c). 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer, B. S. and Anderson, D. B. 1947 Laboratory plant Physiology, D. Van Norstand Co., Inc. New York, 2nd p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petinov, N. S. and Malysheva, K. M. 1961 Fixiol. Rastenii7, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piper, C. S. 1947 Soil and Plant Analysis, Univ. Adelaide 83 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, N.C., Mehrotra, O.N. & Mathur, R.K. Studies of soil moisture stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Soil 52, 581–584 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277954

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277954

Key words

Navigation