Abstract
Possible respondents in a 1974 survey of University of Kentucky doctoral graduates were sent either computer-prepared or offset-printed questionnaires, personalized and identical in content. No difference was found in the overall response rates to the two types of instruments. But when the responses were categorized by the academic major of each recipient according to the theories of Holland (1973) and Biglan (1973a, 1973b), differential response rates appeared. Moreover, interactions of questionnaire type and grouping category were also evident. Response rates were projected using the best type of questionnaire for each grouping category in which a significant interaction occurred. Neither grouping theory was found to be superior to the other in projected response rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. J. Appl. Psychol. 57:195–203.
Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. J. Appl. Psychol. 57:204–213.
Erdos, P. L. (1970). “Professional Mail Surveys.” New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guenther, J., and Paden, J. (1971). The effectiveness of personalized computer follow-up letters in securing questionnaire returns from “reluctant” subjects. Ed. Technol. Pub.
Holland, J. (1973). “Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Nie, N. H., Bent, D. H., and Hill, C. H. (1970). “Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.” New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rossmann, J. E., and Astin, A. W. (1974). Cost-effectiveness of differential techniques for mail questionnaires. Res. Higher Ed. 2:273–279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hesseldenz, J.S., Smith, B.G. Computer-prepared questionnaires and grouping theories: Considerations for mail surveys in academic settings. Res High Educ 6, 85–94 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992017
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992017