Skip to main content
Log in

Biological recovery of two previously acidified, metal-contaminated lakes near Sudbury Ontario, Canada

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies are reported on two small lakes at Sudbury, Ontario located close to a nickel-copper smelter which closed in 1972. At that stage, Baby Lake had a pH of 4.0–4.2 while the adjacent Alice Lake had a pH 5.9–6.3. Both lakes were almost entirely devoid of algae and had neither Zooplankton nor fish. Soon after the closure of the smelter, with its large airborne volume of sulphur dioxide and of copper and nickel containing particulates, the chemistry of the lakes began to change. By 1985, Baby Lake had changed from pH 4.0 to 6.8 and is now at pH 7.2. The pH of Alice Lake increased from a low of 5.9 in the early 1970s to 6.9–7.4 in the mid 1980s and is now at 7.3. Copper and nickel concentrations also decreased in both lakes during this period. The first biota found in the lakes in the post-smelter stage in the early 1980s were benthic red chironomids, planktonic rotifers, and a limited number of phytoplankton species, of which Rhizosolenia was the most common. By the 1990s, 13 phytoplankton species were present in each lake, with a substantial Zooplankton fauna (14 species) of rotifers, copepods, and cladocerans. There are now numerous insect larvae in the sediment and some small fish in both lakes. The biological recovery, which followed substantial reductions in acidity and in soluble nickel and copper concentrations in the waters, is a slower process than chemical recovery and is initially characterized by the dominance of a few species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brydges, T. 1985. pers. comm., Atmospheric Environment Serivce, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deniseger, J., A., Austin, M., Roch, and M.J.R., Clark: 1986. Environmental & Experimental Botany 26 (3), 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, B. and T. C., Hutchinson: 1980, Canadian Journal of Botany 58, 2123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havas, M. and G.E., Likens. 1985. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T.C. and M., Havas: 1986, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 28, 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T.C. and P.M., Stokes: 1975, Metal Toxicity and Algal Bioassays, Water Quality Parameters, American Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 320–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T.C. and L.M., Whitby: 1974, Environmental Conservation 1, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W., J.M., Gunn, and N.D., Yan: 1992, Environmental Pollution 78, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac, H.J., W., Keller, T.C., Hutchinson, and N.D., Yan: 1986, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 31, 791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P.M. and T.C., Hutchinson, and K., Krauter: 1973, Canadian Journal of Botany 51, 2155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitby, L.M. and T.C., Hutchinson: 1974, Environmental Conservation 1, 421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfine, D.G. and M. Havas: 1995, Water, Air and Soil Pollution (this volume).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Havas, M., Woodfine, D.G., Lutz, P. et al. Biological recovery of two previously acidified, metal-contaminated lakes near Sudbury Ontario, Canada. Water Air Soil Pollut 85, 791–796 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476926

Key words

Navigation