Skip to main content
Log in

Burrowing behavior in wild house mice: Variation within and between populations

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Burrowing behavior was assessed on 120 lab-reared house mice (Mus domesticus) derived from five geographic populations representing a north-south cline along the east coast of the United States. Mice were placed individually into Plexiglas containers filled with sand and peat moss, and their burrows were excavated 24 h later. Seven measures were taken and reduced by principal-components analysis to two factors for further analysis. Marked differences existed within, but not between populations, and members of full-sib families built qualitatively and quantitatively similar burrows. The lack of a geographic cline and the apparent high heritability of burrowing behavior do not lend support to its use as a major thermoregulatory adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, N., and Boice, R. (1981). Mouse (Mus) burrows: Effects of age, strain, and domestication.Anim. Learn. Behav. 9:140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J. (1968). The ecology of an island population of the house mouse.J. Anim. Ecol. 37:445–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J., Bonner, W. N., and Peters, J. (1979). Natural selection in house mice from South Georgia (South Atlantic Ocean).J. Zool. Soc. London. 189:385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1977). Burrows of wild and albino rats: Effects of domestication, outdoor raising, age, experience, and maternal state.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91:649–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivar. Behav. Res. 1:245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catell, R. B. (1978).The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, B. C., Adams, N., Boice, R., and Abbott, M. E. (1983). Genetic influences on digging behaviors in mice (Mus musculus) in laboratory and seminatural settings.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 97:249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadem, B. H., Kraus, D. B., and Sheffet, R. H. (1986. Nest-building in gray short-tailed opossums: Temperature effects and sex differences.Physiol. Behav. 36:667–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1981).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed., Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannelly, K., and Lore, R. (1977). Observations of the subterranean activity of domesticated and wild rats (Rattus norvegicus): A descriptive study.Psychol. Rec. 2:315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, T. H., and Brown, G. J. (1975). An experimental analysis of seed hoarding and burrowing behavior in two species of Costa Rican heteromyid rodents.J. Mammal. 56:301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, E. F. (1927). A study of the nest building activity of the albino rat.J. Exp. Zool. 57:117–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A., Maas, D., and Weisman, R. G. (1964). Geographic variation in nest size among species ofPeromyscus.Evolution 18:230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lore, R., and Flannelly, K. (1978). Habitat selection and burrow construction by wildRattus norvegicus in a landfill.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92:888–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C. B. (1974). Environmental modification of nest-building in the White-footed Mouse,Peromyscus leucopus.Anim. Behav. 22:405–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C. B. (1986). Genetic basis of cold adaptation in laboratory and wild mice. In Heller, H. C., Wang, L. C. H., and Musacchia, X. J. (eds.),Living in the Cold: Physiological and Biochemical Adaptations, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C. B., and Possidente, B. P. (1978). Relationship of maternal nesting to thermoregulatory nesting in house mice (Mus musculus) at warm and cold temperatures.Anim. Behav. 26:1136–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muul, I. (1968). Behavioral and physiological influences on the distribution of the flying squirrel,Glaucomys volans.Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Mich. 134:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulchalski, W., Bulova, S. J., Lynch, C. B., and Lynch, G. R. (1988). Photoperiod, temperature and melatonin effects on thermoregulatory behavior in Djungarian hamsters.Physiol. Behav. 42:173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (1967). Some evolutionary implications of behaviour.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9:419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shump, K. A. (1978). Ecological importance of nest construction in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus).Am. Midl. Nat. 89:503–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. G., Williams, M. H., Owens, R. D., Geiger, V. B., and Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). Digging behavior in 12 taxa of muroid rodents.Anim. Learn. Behav. 9:173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. L. (1970). Experiments on nest-building behaviour inPeromyscus (Rodentia: Cricetinae).Anim. Behav. 18:613–615.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BSR 8214739 to C.B.L.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouchard, P.R., Lynch, C.B. Burrowing behavior in wild house mice: Variation within and between populations. Behav Genet 19, 447–456 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066170

Key Words

Navigation