Abstract
The formation and microstructure of nodular defects in thin films of sputtered Ti and evaporated MgF2 are studied and modelled. Unintentional nodular defects in Ti occurred from growth onto uncleaned substrates whereas nodule growth in MgF2 was initiated by seeding the substrate with polystyrene spheres. Nodules grew in a characteristic shape consisting of a cone with a domed top, and with the nodule separated from the bulk of the film by a low density boundary. Simulation of nodule growth by a ballistic deposition model in two and three dimensions confirmed this nodular shape, but also predicted that a low density region extends into the nodule from the boundary. Further predictions of the minimum seed size required to initiate nodule growth lead to suggestions for a technique for film adatom mobility measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. W. PATTEN,Thin Solid Films 63 (1979) 121.
T. SPALVINS, ibid.64 (1979) 143.
K. H. GUENTHER,Appl. Opt. 20 (1981) 1034.
J. A. THORNTON,A. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7 (1977) 239.
B. LIAO, D. J. SMITH and B. McINTYRE, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Boulder Damage Symposium, Boulder, 1985, edited by H. E. Bennett (National Bureau of Standards Publication no. 746, 1988) p. 305.
K. H. GUENTHER, in Proceedings of Optical Thin Films II, San Diego, 1986 (SPIE vol. 678, 1986) p. 2.
D. J. SMITH, in Proceedings of Modelling of Optical Thin Films, San Diego, 1987 (SPIE vol. 821, 1987) p. 120.
T. SMY, K. L. WESTRA and M. J. BRETT,IEEE Trans. Elec. Devices 37 (1990) 591.
M. J. BRETT,J. Mater. Sci. 24 (1989) 623.
R. N. TAIT, T. SMY and M. J. BRETT,Thin Solid Films 187 (1990) 375.
Idem., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8 (1990) 1593
R. RAMANLAL and L. M. SANDER,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1828.
H. J. LEAMY, G. H. GILMER and A. G. DIRKS,Curr. Topics. Mater. Sci. 6 (1980) 309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brett, M.J., Tait, R.N., Dew, S.K. et al. Nodular defect growth in thin films. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 3, 64–70 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00701096
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00701096