Abstract
Purpose
This study examined sperm motion parameters as measured by computerized automated semen analysis before and after a Percoll wash and determined if differences in any parameter were correlated with fertility subsequent to intrauterine insemination (IUI).
Results
Total motile sperm decreased following the washing procedure from 79.0 ± 9.0 to 37.2 ± 7.6 million sperm. Motility increased from a mean of 43.4% to 61.7% (P<0.001). Other motility parameters also changed significantly (P<0.001) as follows: curvilinear velocity (VCL), 43.4 to 61.7 μm/s; straight-line velocity (VSL), 21.3 to 26.7 μm/s; linearity 53.1 to 45.2%; lateral head displacement (ALH), 2.97 to 3.94 μm. Similar changes occurred following a swim-up preparation, although changes in mean motility, VCL, and ALH were significantly greater when compared to Percoll. The postwash changes were not accounted for merely by time lapse in preparation since reanalyzed untreated controls did not show the same changes in motion parameters. Prewash linearity in those specimens which resulted in pregnancies was greater than in those which did not (P=0.28). No other significant differences in pre-or post-Percoll washed sperm motion parameters were found between pregnant vs nonfertile cycles.
Conclusion
Following Percoll wash all CASA-generated motility parameters were significantly altered, but there was little association between these parameters and pregnancy achieved in IUI cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis RO, Katz DF: Computer-aided sperm analysis: technology at a crossroads. Fertil Steril 1993;59(5):953–955
Sigman M: Assisted reproductive techniques and male infertility. Male Infertil 1994;21(3):505–515
Brandeis VT, Manuel MT: Clinical assisted reproduction: effects of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10(6):409–416
Menkveld R, Swanson RJ, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF: Comparison of a discontinuous Percoll gradient method versus a swim-up method: effects on sperm morphology and other semen parameters. Andrologia 1990;22(2):152–158
Englert Y, Van den Bergh M, Rodesch C, Bertrand E, Biramane J, Legreve A: Comparative auto-controlled study between swim-up and Percoll preparation of fresh semen samples for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1992;7(3):399–402
Van der Zwalmen P, Bertin-Segal G, Geerts L, Debauche C, Schoysman R: Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures. Hum Reprod 1991;6(4):581–588
Morales P, Vantman D, Barros C, Vigil P: Human spermatozoa selected by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 1991;6(3):401–404
Ng FL, Liu DY, Baker HW: Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples. Hum Reprod 1992;7(2):261–266
Burkman LJ: Experimental approaches to evaluation and enhancement of sperm functin. In In Vitro Fertilization-Norfolk, HW Jones Jr, GS Jones, GD Hodgen, Z Rosenwaks (eds). Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1986, pp 201–214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swanson, M.L., Collins, J.M., Freiman, S.F. et al. Effect of Percoll wash on sperm motion parameters and subsequent fertility in intrauterine insemination cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 12, 48–54 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214129
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214129