Abstract
An automated version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT) was administered to undergraduates, along with a parallel from. The latency-errors correlation (−0.61) was higher than that reported for most studies in children and weakly supports the view that the correlation increases with age. Repeated exposure resulted in improved performance, which was faster, more accurate, and more efficient, but there was no effect on impulsiveness. Reliability and internal consistency of both forms were acceptably high and the forms were comparable. Use of the univariate measures (impulsiveness-reflectiveness and efficiency-inefficiency) is superior to other scoring methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, W. V. Strategy differences between reflective and impulsive children.Child Development, 1972,43, 1076–1080.
Ault, R., Mitchell, C., and Hartmann, D. P. Some methodological problems in reflection-impulsivity research.Child Development, 1976,47, 227–231.
Bentler, P. M., and McClain, J. A multitrait-multimethod analysis of reflection-impulsivity.Child Development, 1976,47, 218–226.
Block, J., Block, J. H., and Harrington, D. M. Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity.Developmental Psychology, 1974,10, 611–632.
Bush, E. S., and Dweck, C. S. Reflections on conceptual tempo: Relationship between cognitive style and performance as a function of task characteristics.Developmental Psychology, 1975,11, 567–574.
Cronbach, L. J., Schöneman, P., and McKie, D. Alpha coefficients for stratified-parallel tests.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1965,25, 291–312.
Denney, N. W., and List, J. A. Adult age differences in performance on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Human Development, 1979,22, 137–144.
Egeland, B., and Weinberg, R. A. The Matching Familiar Figures Test: A look at its psychometric credibility.Child Development, 1976,47, 483–491.
Feldt, L. S. The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 357–370.
Glow, P. H., and Glow, R. A. Hyperkinetic impulse disorder: A developmental defect of motivation.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1979,10, 159–231.
Glow, R. A., Lange, R. V., Glow, P. H., and Barnett, J. A. Cognitive and self-reported impulsiveness: Comparison of Kagan's MFFT and Eysenck's EPQ impulsiveness measures. Unpublished manuscript. Adelaide: Department of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, 1979.
Haskins, R., and McKinney, J. D. Relative effects of response tempo and accuracy on problem solving and academic achievement.Child Development, 1976,47, 690–696.
Hind, R. M. H. Significance levels for test reliability (KR20). Collected papers of the National Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth, Western Australia, November 1978.
Kagan, J. Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children.Child Development, 1965a,36, 609–628.
Kagan, J. Impulsive and reflective children: Significance of conceptual tempo. In J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.),Learning and the educational process. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965b.
Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., and Phillips, W. Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.Psychological Monographs, 1964,78, Whole No. 578.
Kagan, J., Pearson, L., and Welch, L. Modifiability of an impulsive tempo.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 359–365.
Kendall, P. C., and Finch, A. J. A cognitive-behavioural treatment for impulsivity: A group comparison study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978,46, 110–118.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1968.
Mann, L. Effects of a commitment warning on children's decision behaviour.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971,17, 74–80.
Mann, L. Differences between reflective and impulsive children in tempo and quality of decision making.Child Development, 1973,44, 274–279.
McNemar, Q.Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1962.
Meichenbaum, D. H., and Goodman, J. Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self control.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,77, 115–126.
Messer, S. B. The effect of anxiety over intellectual performance on reflection-impulsivity in children.Child Development, 1970,41, 723–735.
Messer, S. B. Reflection-impulsivity: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1976,83, 1026–1052.
Nadleman, L.The Matching Familiar Figures Test and conceptual tempo controversy, Report 68. Ann Arbor: Developmental Psychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, July 1975.
Salkind, N. J., and Nelson, C. F. A note on the developmental nature of reflection-impulsivity.Developmental Psychology, 1980,3, 237–238.
Salkind, N. J., and Wright, J. C. The development of reflection-impulsivity and cognitive efficiency: An integrated model.Human Development, 1977,20, 377–387.
Stein, N., and Prindavale, P. S. Discrimination learning and stimulus generalization by impulsive and reflective children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976,21, 25–39.
Toner, I., Holstein, R. B., and Hetherington, E. N. Reflection-impulsivity and self control in preschool children.Child Development, 1977,48, 239–245.
Watkins, J. M., Lee, H. B., and Erlich, O. Toward a dependable measure of reflection-impulsivity: An application of generalizability theory.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1980,3, 1–16.
Weiner, A. S., and Adams, W. V. The effect of failure and frustration on reflective and impulsive children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,17, 353–359.
Welford, A. T. Serial reaction time, continuity of task, single channel effects and age. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance, Vol. VI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
Welford, A. T. Perception, memory and motor performance in relation to age. In Conference Proceedings,Le vieillissement: un defi a la science et a la politique sociale, Institut de la Vie, Vichy, France, 1977. London: Pergamon Press, 1980.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. London: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
Wright, J. C., and Vlietstra, A. G. Reflection-impulsivity and information-processing from three to nine years of age. In M. J. Fine (Ed.),Principals and techniques of intervention with hyperactive children. Springfield, Ill.: Charles Thomas, 1977. Pp. 196–243.
Yando, R. M., and Kagan, J. The effect of teacher tempo on the child.Child Development, 1968,39, 27–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by a grant from the Nuffield Foundation, England.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glow, P.H., Lange, R.V., Glow, R.A. et al. The measurement of cognitive impulsiveness: Psychometric properties of two automated adult versions of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 3, 281–295 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350832
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350832