Skip to main content
Log in

Defining Sources of Coffee Plant Odor Attractive toCeratitis Capitata Flies

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated attraction of released mature laboratory-cultured Mediterranean fruit flies to different sources of coffee plant odor placed in potted nonfruiting guava trees in outdoor field cages. Volatiles from crushed medium or dark red fruit ofCoffea arabica cv. arabica plants were significantly more attractive than volatiles from cut leaves or stems of such plants, volatiles from less-ripe crushedC. arabica fruit, and volatiles from crushed red fruit ofC. racemosa,C. canephora, orC. dewevari. Volatiles fromC. arabica cv. arabica crushed red fruit were equally attractive as volatiles from crushed red fruit ofC. congensis orC. arabica cv. mundo, cv. bourbon, cv. kents or cv. catura. Volatiles from as little as 2 g of crushed redC. arabica fruit (= 1 fruit) were as attractive as volatiles from 32 g of such fruit, demonstrating sensitivity of the bioassay approach used to a small amount of source material. Odor ofC. arabica red fruit refrigerated for 1–10 days after picking was significantly more attractive than odor of fresh-picked fruit, while odor of a 24-hr water extract of intact redC. arabica fruit was significantly more attractive than odor of 24-hr extracts of such fruit with methanol, methylene chloride, or hexane or 1- or 6-hr extracts with water. Extraction studies suggested that at least some of the volatiles of red coffee fruit attractive to medflies may be polar water-soluble molecules. In our final test, volatiles from crushed redC. arabica fruit trapped on Super Q and eluted with methylene chloride proved just as attractive as volatiles emanating directly from crushed fruit of the same type. Together, our findings define optimal source material and effective handling procedures of source material for future identification of volatile components of coffee fruit attractive to medflies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • GUTIERREZ-MARTINEZ, A., andONDARZA, R. N. 1996. Kairomone effect of extracts fromCoffea canephora onHypothenemus hampei.Environ. Entomol. 25:96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • JANG, E. B., andLIGHT, D. M. 1996. Olfactory semiochemicals of tephritids, pp. 73–90,in B. A. McPheron and G. J. Steck (eds.). Fruit Fly Pests. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIGHT, D. M., andJANG, E. B. 1996. Plant volatiles evoke and modulate tephritid behavior, pp. 123–133,in B. A. McPheron and G. L. Steck (eds.). Fruit Fly Pests. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIQUIDO, N. J.,SHINODA, L. A., andCUNNINGHAM, R. T. 1991. Host plants of the Mediterranean fruit fly: An annotated world review.Misc. Public. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77:1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYONS, J. M. 1973. Chilling injury in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:445–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLAR, J. 1995. An overview of attractants for the Mediterranean fruit fly, pp. 123–143,in J. G. Morse, R. L. Metcalf, J. R. Carey, and R. V. Dowell (eds.). The Medfly in California: Defining Critical Research. College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIGG, H. N.,MALLORY, L. L.,SIMPSON, S. E.,CALLAHAM, S. B.,TOTH, J. P.,FRASER, S.,KLIM, M.,NAGY, S.,NATION, J. L., andATTAWAY, J. A. 1994. Caribbean fruit fly,Anastrepha suspensa (Loew), attraction to host fruit and host kairomones.J. Chem. Ecol. 20:727–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAPAJ, D. R.,AVERILL, A. L.,PROKOPY, R. J., andWONG, T. T. Y. 1992. Host marking pheromone and use of previously established oviposition sites by the Mediterrean fruit fly.J. Insect Behav. 5:583–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROKOPY, R. J., andVARGAS, R. I. 1996. Attraction ofCeratitis capitata flies to odor of coffee fruit.J. Chem. Ecol. 22:807–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBACKER, D. C.,WARFIELD, W. C., andFLATH, R. A. 1992. A four-component attractant for the Mexican fruit fly,Anastrepha ludens, from host fruit.J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1239–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCARPATI, M. L.,SCALZO, R. L.,VITA, G., andGAMBARCORTA, A. 1996. Chemotropic behavior of female olive fly (Bactrocera olea Gmel.) onOlea europaea L.J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • VARGAS, R. I.,WALSH, W. A., andNISHIDA, T. 1995. Colonization of newly planted coffee fields: Dominance of Mediterranean fruit fly over oriental fruit fly.J. Econ. Entomol. 88:620–627.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prokopy, R.J., Phillips, T.W., Vargas, R.I. et al. Defining Sources of Coffee Plant Odor Attractive toCeratitis Capitata Flies. J Chem Ecol 23, 1577–1587 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006423.53109.15

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006423.53109.15

Navigation