Skip to main content
Log in

Fusion Specific Features in ITER Accident Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fusion specific features like inherent plasma shutdown, low decay heat densities, cryogenic temperatures, and limited source terms were considered during the safety design process of ITER. Uncertainties in plasma disruptions motivates a robust design to cope with multiple failures of in-vessel cooling piping. A vacuum vessel pressure suppression system mitigates pressure transients and effectively captures mobilized radioactivity. In case of pump trips or ex-vessel coolant losses in the divertor the plasma needs to be actively terminated in a few seconds. Failure to do so might damage the divertor but radiological consequences will be minor due to the intact first confinement barrier. Tritium plant inventories are protected by several layers of confinement. Uncontrolled release of magnet energy will be prevented by design. Postulated damage from magnets to confinement barriers causes fluid ingress (air, water, helium) into the cryostat. The cold environment limits pressurization. Most tritium and dust is captured by condensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. Piet, L. Di Pace, G. Federici et al. (1996). Source Term and Mobilization Assessment in NSSR-1. IAEA 6th Technical Committee Meeting on Developments in Fusion Safety, Naka, Japan, October.

  2. N. A. Uckan, S. Putvinski, J. Wesley et al. (submitted). ITER physics-safety interface: Models and assessment. Fusion Technol.

  3. T. Honda, H.-W. Bartels, N. A. Uckan, Y. Seki, and T. Okazaki (submitted). Development of time dependent safety analysis code for plasma anomaly events in fusion reactors. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.

  4. T. Honda, H.-W. Bartels, N. A. Uckan, T. Okazaki, and Y. Seki (submitted). Safety analysis and in-vessel components transient during plasma abnormal events in fusion reactors. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.

  5. B. J. Merrill and S. C. Jardin (1991). Coolant ingress induced plasma disruption calculations for ITER. Fusion Technol. 19, 1278-1283.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Iseli, H.-W. Bartels, and A. Poucet (1996). Decay Heat Removal by Natural Circulation of Vacuum Vessel Coolant for ITER. IAEA 6th Technical Committee Meeting on Developments in Fusion Safety, Naka, Japan, October.

  7. H.-W. Bartels, E. Cheng, M. J. Gaeta et al. (1996). Decay heat removal in the ITER outline design. Fus. Eng. Design, 31, 203-219.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Gay (1996). Analysis of the IDR Divertor Response to LOFA and LOCA Transients. DI/SEPS/96-00370, Technicatome, Ets D'Aix Provence, France, March.

  9. Y. Shimomura, R. Aymar, H.-W. Bartels et al. (1996). Safety Characteristics for ITER. IAEA-CN-64/F3, 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Montreal, Canada, October.

  10. M. J. Gaeta, B. J. Merrill, H.-W. Bartels et al. (submitted). Short term hydrogen production issues for ITER. Fusion Technol.

  11. D. A. Petti et al. (1996). Safety analysis results for ITER in-vessel loss of coolant events. IAEA 6th Technical Committee Meeting on Developments in Fusion Safety, Naka, Japan, October.

  12. B. J. Merrill, L. C. Cadwallader, and D. A. Petti (1996). Safety analysis results for cryostat ingress accidents in ITER. IAEA 6th Technical Committee Meeting on Developments in Fusion Safety, Naka, Japan, October.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartels, HW., Gordon, C.W., Piet, S.J. et al. Fusion Specific Features in ITER Accident Analysis. Journal of Fusion Energy 16, 3–10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022548526123

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022548526123

Navigation