Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational Exposure: The Role of Circuit Chemistry and Tube Coatings in Reducing the ORE of Advanced Water Cooled Fusion Plants and the Potential Effects of Magnetic Fields

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On a conservative calculation for a nonoptimized design, the Safety and Environmental Assessment of Fusion Power (SEAFP) water cooled design (Model 2) was found to have an Occupational Radiological Exposure (ORE) which would be too high by today's standards. This paper describes the investigations which have been undertaken to reduce the expected ORE to acceptable levels. In addition, an investigation on allowable exposure to magnetic fields was carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. Reader et al., Safety and Environmental Assessment of Fusion Power (SEAFP), Report of the SEAFP Project, EURFUBRU XII-217/95, 1995.

  2. J. Mustoe, S. M. Ali, L. Di Pace, C. B. A. Forty, B.-C. Friedrich, and S. Sandri, Operator Protection for a Future Commercial Fusion Plant, Paper presented at 19th SOFT, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 16–20, 1996.

  3. S. M. Ali and V. Grabon, The Reduction of Operator Dose by Reducing the Corrosion Rates of Materials in the SEAFP-PM2 Blanket Coolant Circuit, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/R-3.1(96), 1996.

  4. C. B. A. Forty, Corrosion Product Activation and Model Comparison, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/R-3.4(96), 1996.

  5. L. Di Pace and S. Sandri, Activated Corrosion Product Assessment for the Water Cooled SEAFP Model 2. SEAL Project Report, SEAL/3.3/2(96) and ENEA ERG-FUS/TECN S+E TR14/96, 1996.

  6. P. Beslu, G. Frejaville, and A. Lalet, A Computer Code PAC-TOLE to Predict Activation and Transport of Corrosion Products in a PWR, Procs. of 1st Conference on Water Chemistry of Nuclear Reactor Systems, London (BNES), 1978, pp. 195–201.

  7. S. M. Ali, Input data for CORA-NNC Calculations, EFET/NNC Report, EFET/TR/N056 Issue V02, 1995.

  8. L. Di Pace and S. Sandri, Activated Corrosion Product Assessment and Related ORE Evaluation Methodology, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/3.3/1(96) and ENEA ERG-FUS/TECN S+E TR2/96, 1996.

  9. S. M. Ali, An Assessment of the Blanket Coolant Chemistries in SEAFP-APM by the CORA-NNC Code to Reduce Operational Radiation Exposure, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/R-3.1 (96) and EFET/TR/N067, 1996.

  10. S. Sandri, ITER EDA, Radiation Personnel Safety at PHTS, ENEA Laboratory Report, ENEA ERG-FUS/TECN S+E 13/95, 1995.

  11. B.-C. Friedrich, Reduction of Operator Dose Using Tube Coatings, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/R-3.2(96), 1996.

  12. J. McMurtrie, W. Trow, and H. M. Thompson, Framework for the Control of Stray Magnetic Fields, SEAL Project Report, SEAL/R-3.5(96), 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mustoe, J., Ali, S.M., Di Pace, L. et al. Occupational Exposure: The Role of Circuit Chemistry and Tube Coatings in Reducing the ORE of Advanced Water Cooled Fusion Plants and the Potential Effects of Magnetic Fields. Journal of Fusion Energy 16, 291–298 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021863824995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021863824995

Navigation