Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of bumetanide response in the dog: Effect of probenecid

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous bumetanide (0.250 mg/kg), alone (treatment I) and after probenecid pretreatment (treatment II), were studied in four mongrel dogs. Lactated Ringer's solution was administered by vein throughout both treatments at a flow rate of 2 ml/min to avoid fluid and electrolyte depletion. Bumetanide and probenecid concentrations were analyzed by HPLC, sodium by flame photometry, and creatinine by colorimetry. Although the probenecid markedly reduced the plasma and renal clearances of bumetanide, as well as the fraction excreted unchanged in the urine, there was no significant difference between treatments I and II in the 4-hr natriuretic and diuretic responses. However, analysis of the dose-response curves between treatments I and II showed that sodium, excretion was better correlated with bumetanide urinary excretion rate than with plasma concentration. The reasons for a poor correlation between treatments during the early time periods are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. H. Frey. Pharmacology of bumetanide.Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. 51:14–18 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. U. B. Olsen. The pharmacology of bumetanide: a review.Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. Suppl III:3–29 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Cohen. Pharmacology of bumetanide.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 21:537–542 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bourke, M. J. A. Asbury, S. O'Sullivan, and P. B. B. Gatenby. The sites of action of bumetanide in man.Eur. J. Pharmacol. 23:283–289 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Jayakumar and J. B. Puschett. Study of the sites and mechanisms of action of bumetanide in man.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 201:251–258 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Imai. Effect of bumetanide and furosemide on the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop of rabbits and rats perfused in vitro.Eur. J. Pharmacol. 41: 409–416 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. G. Karlander, R. Henning, and O. Lundvall. Renal effects of bumetanide, a new saluretic agent.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 6:220–223 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. E. H. Østergaard, M. P. Magnussen, C. K. Nielsen, E. Eilertsen, and H. H. Frey. Pharmacological properties of 3-n-butylamino-4-phenoxy-5-sulfamylbenzoic acid (bumetanide), a new potent diuretic.Arzneim.-Forsch. 22:66–72 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. R. Cohen, E. Hinsch, R. Vergona, J. Ryan, S. J. Kolis, and M. A. Schwartz. A comparative diuretic and tissue distribution study of bumetanide and furosemide in the dog.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 197:697–702 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P. A. Friedman and F. Roch-Ramel. Hemodynamic and natriuretic effects of bumetanide and furosemide in the cat.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 203:82–91 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S. D. Holland and H. E. Williamson. Probenecid inhibition of bumetanide-induced natriuresis in the dog.Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 161:299–302 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A. F. Lant. Effects of bumetanide on cation and anion transport.Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. 51:35–42 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. C. Brater and P. Chennavasin. Effect of probenecid on response to bumetanide in man.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 21:311–315 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D. E. Smith. High-performance liquid Chromatographic assay for bumetanide in plasma and urine.J. Pharm. Sci. 71:520–523 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. G. Wagner. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from intravenous data by uniform methods and some of their uses.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:161–182 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Yamaoka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 6:165–175 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. G. Wagner.Fundamentals of Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Drug Intelligence Publications, Hamilton, Ill., 1975, pp. 38, 83, 349.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Z. Benet. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of furosemide in man: a reviewJ. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:1–27 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Chennavasin, R. Seiwell, D. C. Brater, and W. M. M. Liang. Pharmacodynamic analysis of the furosemide-probenecid interaction in man.Kidney Int. 16:187–195 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D. E. Smith and L. Z. Benet. Relationship between urinary excretion rate, steady-state plasma levels and diuretic response of furosemide in the rat.Pharmacology 19:301–306 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D. E. Smith, W. L. Gee, D. C. Brater, E. T. Lin, and L. Z. Benet. Preliminary evaluation of furosemide-probenecid interaction in humans.J. Pharm. Sci. 69:571–575 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. T. P. Green and B. L. Mirkin. Resistance of proteinuric rats to furosemide: urinary drug protein binding as determinant of drug effect.Life Sci. 26:623–630 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. N. H. G. Holford and L. B. Sheiner. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.Clin. Pharmacokin. 6:429–453 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. P. Green and B. L. Mirkin. Furosemide disposition in normal and proteinuric rats: urinary drug-protein binding as a determinant of drug excretion.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 218:122–127 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.E., Lau, H.S.H. Determinants of bumetanide response in the dog: Effect of probenecid. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 11, 31–46 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061766

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061766

Key words

Navigation