Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of point and interval estimates in population pharmacokinetics using Nonmem analysis

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a simulation study of the estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters, including fixed and random effects, the estimates and confidence intervals produced by NONMEM were evaluated. Data were simulated according to a monoexponential model with a wide range of design and statistical parameters, under both steady state (SS) and nonSS conditions. Within the range of values for population parameters commonly encountered in research and clinical settings, NONMEM produced parameter estimates for CL, V, σCL,and σe which exhibit relatively small biases. As the range of variability increases, these biases became larger and more variable. An important exception was bias in the estimate for σv which was large even when the underlying variability was small. NONMEM standard error estimates are appropriate as estimates of standard deviation when the underlying variability is small. Except in the case of CL,standard error estimates tend to deteriorate as underlying variability increases. An examination of confidence interval coverage indicates that caution should be exercised when the usual 95% confidence intervals are used for hypothesis testing. Finally, simulationbased corrections of point and interval estimates are possible but corrections must be performed on a casebycase basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. L. Steimer, A. Mallet, and F. Mentre. Estimating interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.Variability in Drug Therapy: Description, Estimation and Control, In M., Rowland, L. B. Sheiner, and J.-L. Steimer (eds.), Raven Press, New York, 1985, pp. 65–111.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. L. Beal and L. B. Sheiner. The NONMEM system.Am. Statist. 34:118–119 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and V. V. Marathe. Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:445–479 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. H. Grasela, L. B. Sheiner, B. Rambeck, H. E. Boenigk, A. Dunlop, P. W. Mullen, J. Wadsworth, A. Richens, T. Ishazaki, K. Chiba, H. Miura, K. Minagawa, P. G. Blain, J. C. Mucklow, C. T. Bacon, and M. Rawlins. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of phenytoin from routinely collected patient data.Clin. Pharmacokin. 8:355–364 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. H. Grasela and L. B. Sheiner. Population pharmacokinetics of procainamide from routine clinical data.Clin. Pharmacokin. 9:545–554 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Vozeh, G. Katz, V. Steiner, and F. Follath. Population pharmacokinetic parameters in patients treated with oral mexilitene.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 23:445–451 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Vozeh, M. Wenk, and F. Follath. Experience with NONMEM: Analysis of serum concentration data in patients treated with tnexilitene and lidocaine.Drug Metab. Rev. 15:305–315 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. W. Kelman, A. H. Thompson, B. Whiting, S. M. Bryson, D. A. Streedman, G. E. Mawer, and L. A. Samba-Donga. Estimation of gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution in neonates and young children.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18:685–692 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D. R. Mungall, T. M. Ludden, S. Marshall, D. W. Hawkins, R. L. Talbert, and M. H. Crawford. Population pharmacokinetics of racemic warfarin in aduit patients.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 13:213–227 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. H. Grasela and S. M. Donn. Neonatal population pharmacokinetics of phenobarbitol derived from routine clinical data.Dev. Pharmacol. Ther. 8:374–383 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. P. O. Maitre, S. Vozeh, J. Heykants, D. A. Thompson, and D. R. Stanski. Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: The average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.Anesthesiology 66:3–12 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T. H. Grasela, E. J. Antal, L. Ereshefsky, B. G. Wells, R. L. Evans, and R. B. Smith. An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part II. Detection of a drug-drug interaction.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 42:443–441 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. L. Beal and L. B. Sheiner. Estimating population kinetics.CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 8:195–222 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. I. Michaelis-Menten model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 8:553–571 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 9:635–651 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 11:303–319 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. L. Lehmann,Nonparametrics, Statistical Methods Based on Ranks, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1975, pp. 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SAS User's Guide: Basics, Version 5 Edition, SAS institute, Inc., Cary NO, 1985, p. 1187.

  19. E. S. Moore, R. G. Faix, R. C. Banagale, and T. H. Grasela. The population pharmacokinetics of theophylline in neonates and young infants.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 17:47–66 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E. J. Antal, T. H., Grasela and R. B. Smith. An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part III. Prospective data collection versus retrospective data assembly.Clin. Pharmac. Ther. 46:552–559 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. B. Smith, P. D. Kroboth, J. T. Vanderlugt, J. P. Phillips, and R. P. Juhl. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alprazolam after oral and iv administration.Psychopharmacology 84:452–456 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Ciraulo, J. G. Barnhill, H. G. Boxenbaum, D. J. Greenblatt, and R. B. Smith. Pharmacokinetic and clinical effects of alprazolam following single and multiple oral doses. in patients with panic disorder.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 26:292–298 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. S. L. Beal, L. B. Sheiner.NONMEM User's Guides, Pan VI, NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco, 1989, pp. 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. A note on confidence intervals with extended least square parameter estimates.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 15:93–98 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. C. R. Rao.Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, Wiley, New York, 1965, pp.347–352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partial support received from Upjohn Co., NIH-BRSG SO RR 07066, and the Burroughs Wellcome Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, D.B., Walawander, C.A., Tung, Y. et al. An evaluation of point and interval estimates in population pharmacokinetics using Nonmem analysis. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19, 87–112 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062194

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062194

Key words

Navigation