Skip to main content
Log in

Identifiable pharmacokinetic models: The role of extra inputs and measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single input, single output experiments can result in nonunique solutions for the rate constants of a linear compartmental model used to describe the pharmacokinetics. Where a finite number of solutions exists, a priori knowledge has to be used to distinguish between the solutions. Where there is an infinite number of solutions, assumptions have to be made about the values of some rate constants in order to obtain a unique solution for the others. This paper considers such experiments and determines whether either the addition of an extra input (simultaneously with the first input) or the taking of an extra measurement would result in a unique solution. It is found that perturbing a second input can be useful, but only if the perturbation is of different shape from the first input. Measurements of drug in urine and metabolite in plasma are generally not helpful in resolving identifiability of the drug dynamic model. If a radioactive tracer is used, though, the second measurement (for example, by externally scanning the radioactivity of the liver) can prove useful, but only if the gain of the measuring device is known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Bellman and K. J. Åström. On structural identifiability.Math. Biosci. 7:329–339 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Glover and J. C. Willems. Parametrization of linear dynamical systems: canonical forms and identifiability.IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-19:640–645 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. F. Brown and K. R. Godfrey. Problems of determinacy in compartmental modelling with application to bilirubin kinetics.Math. Biosci. 40:205–224 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. d'A. Heck, K. Maloney, and M. Anbar. Long-term urinary excretion of methaqualone in a human subject.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 6:111–122 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Jacquez.Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. B. Waide, J. E. Krebs, S. P. Clarkson, and E. M. Setzler. A linear systems analysis of the calcium cycle in a forested watershed ecosystem.Prog. Theor. Biol. 3:261–345 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Wei.Catalysis and Reactors, Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., Monograph Series 6, Vol. 65, 1969.

  8. M. Espana and I. M. Landau. Reduced-order bilinear models for distillation columns.Automatica 14:345–355 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. F. Brown and J. P. Norton. Identifiability of large compartmental models. In2nd IFAC Symp. Large-Scale Systems, Toulouse, June 1980.

  10. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.Pharmacokinetics, Vol. 1 ofDrugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences, J. Swarbrick (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Wagner.Fundamentals of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Drug Intelligence Publications, Hamilton, Ill., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. J. Cutler. On the definition of the compartment concept in pharmacokinetics.J. Theor. Biol. 73:329–345 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Rowland, L. Z. Benet, and S. Riegelman. Two-compartment model for a drug and its metabolite: application to acetylsalicylic acid pharmacokinetics.J. Pharm. Sci. 59:364–367 (1970).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D. M. Foster, R. L. Aamodt, R. I. Henkin, and M. Berman. Zinc metabolism in humans: a kinetic model.Am. J. Physiol. 237:R340-R349 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Riegelman, M. Rowland, and L. Z. Benet. Use of isotopes in bioavailability testing.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 1:83–87 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. F. Brown, E. R. Carson, L. Finkelstein, K. R. Godfrey, and R. P. Jones. Adequacy of measurements in compartmental modelling of metabolic systems.Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 17:216–222 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R. F. Brown. The identifiability of nonlinear compartmental models. InFifth IFAC Symp. Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Darmstadt, September 1979, Paper M11.5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work described in this paper was supported by Grant No. GR/A 14827 from the U.K. Science Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey, K.R., Jones, R.P. & Brown, R.F. Identifiable pharmacokinetic models: The role of extra inputs and measurements. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 8, 633–648 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01060058

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01060058

Key words

Navigation