Abstract
Previous research (Hall, Scholnick, & Hughes, 1987) suggested that cognitive word meanings denote six increasingly abstract and complex cognitive processes. In this paper, we further investigated two interrelated aspects of this framework. A set of 36 conversations with children aged 4:5 to 5 provided the data. In Study 1, issues related to the optimal ordering of levels were examined by comparing the original sequence with a restructured model. In Study 2, the hypothesis that, in addition toknow, other polysemous cognitive internal state words would be hierarchically organized was tested. The findings lent support to the restructured model, but rejected the hypothesis that polysemous words within the domain were characterized by equivalent,hhierarchically organized levels. We conclude by proposing that cognitive internal state words were related by complementarity of levels rather than equivalence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbeduto, L., & Rosenberg, S. (1985). Children's knowledge of the presuppositions of know and other cognitive verbs.Journal of Child Language, 12, 621–641.
Anglin, J. M. (1985). The child's expressible knowledge of word concepts: What preschoolers can say about the meanings of some nouns and verbs. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.),Children's language (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind.Developmental Psychology, 18, 906–921.
Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.),Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, W. S., Frank, R. E., & Ellison, C. (1991).Pretend as a Pivot in Children's Early Mental State Language. Unpublished manuscript.
Hall, W. S., & Nagy, W. E. (1986). Theoretical issues in the investigation of words of internal report. In I. Gopnik & M. Gopnik (Eds.),From models to modules: Studies in cognitive Science from the McGill workshops. (pp. 25–65). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Hall, W. S., & Nagy, W. E. (1987). The semantic-pragmatic distinction in the investigation of mental state words: The role of the situation.Discourse Processes, 10, 169–180.
Hall, W. S., Nagy, W. E., & Linn, R. (1984).Spoken words: Effects of situation and social group on oral word usage and frequency. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hall, W. S., Nagy, W. E., & Nottenberg, G. (1981).Situational variation in the use of internal state words (Tech. Rep. No. 212). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Hall, W. S., & Plude, D. (1991).The Development of knowledge of the internal state lexicon. Unpublished manuscript.
Hall, W. S., Scholnick, E. K., & Hughes, A. T. (1987). Contextual constraints on usage of cognitive words.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 289–310.
Hughes, A. T. (1985).Comprehension and production of cognitive words. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Johnson, C. N. (1982). Acquisition of mental verbs and the concept of mind. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.),Language development: Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, C. N., & Maratsos, M. (1977). Early comprehension of mental verbs: Think and know.Child Development, 48, 1743–1747.
Johnson, C. N., & Wellman, H. M. (1980). Children's developing understanding of mental verbs: Remember, know, and guess.Child Development, 51, 1095–1102.
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
Macnamera, J., Baker, E., & Olson, C. L. (1976). Four-year-olds understanding ofpretend, forget, andknow: Evidence for propositional operations.Child Development, 47, 62–70.
Miscione, J. L., Marvin, R. S., O'Brien, R. G., & Greenberg, M. T. (1978). A developmental study of preschool children's understanding of the words “know” and “guess.”Child Development, 49, 1107–1113.
Moore, C., Bryant, D., & Furrow, D. (1989). Mental terms and the development of certainty.Child Development, 60, 167–171.
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1986). Children's acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In. W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.),Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational issues. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Scholnick, E. K. (1987). The language of mind: Statements about mental states.Discourse Processes, 10, 181–192.
Scholnick, E. K., & Hall, W. S. (in press). The language of thinking: Metacognitive and conditional words. In J. P. Byrnes & S. A. Gelman (Eds.),Perspectives on language and cognition: Interrelations in development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state.Cognition, 14, 301–321.
Wellman, H. M. (1985). The child's theory of mind: The development of conceptions of cognition. In S. Yussen (Ed.),The growth of reflection in children. Orlando: Academic Press.
Wellman, H. M. (1988). First steps in the child's theorizing about the mind. In J. Astington, P. Harris, & D. Olson (Eds.),Developing theories of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, H. M., & Estes, D. (1987). Children's early use of mental verbs and what they mean.Discourse Processes, 10, 141–156.
Wellman, H. M., & Johnson, C. N. (1979). Understanding of mental processes: A Developmental study of “remember” and “forget.”Child Development, 50, 79–88.
Wing, C. S., & Scholnick, E. K. (1986). Understanding the language of reasoning: Cognitive, linguistic and developmental influences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 383–401.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research on which this paper is based was supported by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York to William S. Hall. Data analysis was supported by the Computer Science Center at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frank, R.E., Hall, W.S. Polysemy and the acquisition of the cognitive internal state lexicon. J Psycholinguist Res 20, 283–304 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074282
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074282