Skip to main content
Log in

Nutrient and nutritional evaluation of sinasin prepared in two ways

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two types of sinasin, a rice-based fermented kanuri flat bread, were prepared and evaluated for their nutrient content and nutritional qualities. The preparation of the sinasin entailed using ‘traditional’ and ‘developed’ methods. The nutritional qualities of the products were evaluated in Wistar-strain albino rats using the Food Efficiency Ratio (FER), and Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) methods. There was a higher protein content (11.11 percent) in the traditional sinasin than in the developed sinasin (9.93 percent). However, a one-way analysis of variance indicated no significant difference in FER, but a significantly different mean PER (p<0.01) of 1.3 and 1.5 for the traditional and developed sinasin respectively. The two methods of preparation of the sinasin, their nutrient composition and nutritional qualities are described in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addy EO, Eteshola E (1984) Nutritive value of a mixture of tigernut tubers (Cyperus esculentus L.) and baobab seeds (Adansonia digitata L.). J Sc Food Agric 35: 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1984) Official Methods of Analysis, Sidney William (ed), 14th edition, Arlington, Virginia 22209.

  3. Brennan JG, Butters JB, Cowell ND, Lilly AEV (1976) Food engineering operations. 2nd edition. London: Applied Science Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davies AT, Austic RE (1982) Threonine imbalance and threonine requirement of chicken. J Nutr 112: 2170–2176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eka OU, Aliu EB (1974) Nutrient status of diets of patients in Ahmadu Bello university teaching hospital, Zaria. W Afr J Biol Appl Chem 17: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Food and Agriculture Organization (1968) Food composition table for use in Africa. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Godowoli FA (1986) Development and presentation of Nigerian dishes with reference to Borno state. HND Project, Department of Food Science and Catering Studies, Ramat Polytechnic, Maiduguri.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kure RJ (1990) Nutrient composition and nutritional status of traditionally prepared sinasin and sinasin prepared by a ‘developed’ method. B.Sc. Project, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mead R, Curnow RN (1983) Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nnanyelugo D (1984) Assessment of school milk consumption — its relationship to physical growth of urban and rural primary school children. Nig J Nutr Sc 5(2): 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oyeleke OA (1988) The effect of kanwa on the nutrient contents of okra vegetable and bean legume. Nig J Nutr Sc 9(2): 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  12. RMRDC (1992) Raw materials research and development council: investment profile for Nigeria. Vol 1. P.M.B. 12873, Lagos, Nigeria.

  13. Shettima AY (1989) A study of the traditional processing of ndaleyi: a sorghum-based fermented kanuri food product. B.Sc. Project, Department of Food Sc and Technology, University of Maiduguri.

  14. Toyomizu M, Yukio Akiba, Masaaki Horiguchi, Tatsuro Matsumoto (1982) Multiple regression and response surface analyses of the effects of dietary protein, fat and carbohydrate on the body protein and fat gains in growing chicks. J Nutr 112: 886–896.

    Google Scholar 

  15. West BB, Wood L, Hagger V, Shugart G (1977) Food service in institutions, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chibuzo, E.C., Godowoli, F.A. & Kure, R.J. Nutrient and nutritional evaluation of sinasin prepared in two ways. Plant Food Hum Nutr 49, 139–145 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091971

Key words

Navigation