Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of consistent voting systems

  • Papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider exactly and strongly consistent voting functions where the alternative set is the set of real numbers and each person's preference ordering is determined by a utility function ¦x−x*¦ wherex * is his most preferred alternative. We prove that a voting function which is continuous, anonymous, weakly Pareto, and strongly and exactly consistent must coincide with a class of generalized medians studied byMoulin [1978]. Thus, such a function is actually strategyproof. The continuity assumption can be weakened a little, but we give an example of a noncontinuous function which is strongly and exactly consistent, anonymous, and weakly Pareto, but is not strategyproof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dutta, B., andP.K. Pattanaik: On Nicely Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H.: Strategy-Proofness and Single-Peakedness. U.E.R. Mathematiques de la Decision, University of Paris, July 1978.

  • Peleg, B.: Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K.: Strategy and Group Choice. New York 1978.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., Roush, F.W. Properties of consistent voting systems. Int J Game Theory 10, 45–52 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01770070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01770070

Keywords

Navigation