Abstract
We consider exactly and strongly consistent voting functions where the alternative set is the set of real numbers and each person's preference ordering is determined by a utility function ¦x−x*¦ wherex * is his most preferred alternative. We prove that a voting function which is continuous, anonymous, weakly Pareto, and strongly and exactly consistent must coincide with a class of generalized medians studied byMoulin [1978]. Thus, such a function is actually strategyproof. The continuity assumption can be weakened a little, but we give an example of a noncontinuous function which is strongly and exactly consistent, anonymous, and weakly Pareto, but is not strategyproof.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dutta, B., andP.K. Pattanaik: On Nicely Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 163–170.
Moulin, H.: Strategy-Proofness and Single-Peakedness. U.E.R. Mathematiques de la Decision, University of Paris, July 1978.
Peleg, B.: Consistent Voting Systems. Econometrica46, 1978, 153–161.
Pattanaik, P.K.: Strategy and Group Choice. New York 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, K.H., Roush, F.W. Properties of consistent voting systems. Int J Game Theory 10, 45–52 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01770070
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01770070